Why did the Deepwater Horizon oil spill not transform the Mexican Gulf’s oil extraction frontier?
(2025) SGED07 20251Department of Human Geography
- Abstract
- This thesis examines how political and corporate actors discursively framed the risks associated with deepwater drilling, following the Deepwater Horizon oil spill 2010. Despite the scale and severity of the disaster, the deepwater oil production in the Mexican Gulf has increased since 2010. Through a Critical Discourse Analysis, using Corpus Linguistics tools, the US Government and BP’s public press releases are analyzed to provide an understanding of language, and its role in legitimizing extractive practices. The findings identify several discursive mechanisms, including minimization, externalization, technocratization and depoliticization of risk. In a larger context, this contributes to a detachment from material reality, and the... (More)
- This thesis examines how political and corporate actors discursively framed the risks associated with deepwater drilling, following the Deepwater Horizon oil spill 2010. Despite the scale and severity of the disaster, the deepwater oil production in the Mexican Gulf has increased since 2010. Through a Critical Discourse Analysis, using Corpus Linguistics tools, the US Government and BP’s public press releases are analyzed to provide an understanding of language, and its role in legitimizing extractive practices. The findings identify several discursive mechanisms, including minimization, externalization, technocratization and depoliticization of risk. In a larger context, this contributes to a detachment from material reality, and the accumulation of risks in an increasingly deregulated industry. The study concludes that the constitutive effect of the US Government and BP’s discursive mechanisms was a legitimization of deepwater drilling. (Less)
Please use this url to cite or link to this publication:
http://lup.lub.lu.se/student-papers/record/9200970
- author
- Strollo, Siri LU
- supervisor
- organization
- course
- SGED07 20251
- year
- 2025
- type
- M2 - Bachelor Degree
- subject
- language
- English
- id
- 9200970
- date added to LUP
- 2025-06-24 11:16:54
- date last changed
- 2025-06-24 11:16:54
@misc{9200970, abstract = {{This thesis examines how political and corporate actors discursively framed the risks associated with deepwater drilling, following the Deepwater Horizon oil spill 2010. Despite the scale and severity of the disaster, the deepwater oil production in the Mexican Gulf has increased since 2010. Through a Critical Discourse Analysis, using Corpus Linguistics tools, the US Government and BP’s public press releases are analyzed to provide an understanding of language, and its role in legitimizing extractive practices. The findings identify several discursive mechanisms, including minimization, externalization, technocratization and depoliticization of risk. In a larger context, this contributes to a detachment from material reality, and the accumulation of risks in an increasingly deregulated industry. The study concludes that the constitutive effect of the US Government and BP’s discursive mechanisms was a legitimization of deepwater drilling.}}, author = {{Strollo, Siri}}, language = {{eng}}, note = {{Student Paper}}, title = {{Why did the Deepwater Horizon oil spill not transform the Mexican Gulf’s oil extraction frontier?}}, year = {{2025}}, }