Pia Sundgren
71 – 80 of 222
- show: 10
- |
- sort: year (new to old)
Close
Embed this list
<iframe src=" "
width=" "
height=" "
allowtransparency="true"
frameborder="0">
</iframe>
- 2017
-
Mark
The shaken baby syndrome report was not the result of a conspiracy. Response to Dr. Narang et al.
(
- Contribution to journal › Debate/Note/Editorial
-
Mark
The scientific evidence regarding retinal haemorrhages. Response to Hellgren et al. and Levin
(
- Contribution to journal › Debate/Note/Editorial
-
Mark
Authors' overarching reply to all the responses received to the systematic literature review on shaken baby syndrome
(
- Contribution to journal › Debate/Note/Editorial
-
Mark
Insufficient evidence for 'shaken baby syndrome' - a systematic review
(
- Contribution to journal › Scientific review
-
Mark
The effect of white matter hyperintensities on statistical analysis of diffusion tensor imaging in cognitively healthy elderly and prodromal Alzheimer’s disease
(
- Contribution to journal › Article
-
Mark
Detailed anatomy at 7T
2017) p.69-80(
- Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceeding › Book chapter
-
Mark
Differentiation of Brain Metastases due to Primary Malignancy and Glioblastomas using Dynamic Susceptibility Contrast-Enhanced MR at 3T
2017) 40th ESNR Annual Meeting(
- Contribution to conference › Abstract
-
Mark
The effects of uterine artery embolization with a new degradable microsphere in an experimental study
(
- Contribution to journal › Article
-
Mark
Is accepting circular reasoning in shaken baby studies bad science or misconduct?
(
- Contribution to journal › Article
-
Mark
Shaken baby syndrome and the risk of losing scientific scrutiny
(
- Contribution to journal › Article