Advanced

Endurance Per Se in B-time

Hansson Wahlberg, Tobias LU (2009) In Metaphysica 10(2). p.175-183
Abstract
Three arguments for the conclusion that objects cannot endure in B-time even if they remain intrinsically unchanged are examined: Carter and Hestevold’s enduring-objects-as-universals argument (American Philosophical Quarterly 31(4):269–283, 1994) and Barker and Dowe’s paradox 1 and paradox 2 (Analysis 63(2):106–114, 2003, Analysis 65(1):69–74, 2005). All three are shown to fail.
Please use this url to cite or link to this publication:
author
organization
publishing date
type
Contribution to journal
publication status
published
subject
keywords
B-time - Endurance - Mereology - Paradox - Persistence - Universals
in
Metaphysica
volume
10
issue
2
pages
175 - 183
publisher
Springer
ISSN
1437-2053
DOI
10.1007/s12133-009-0049-z
language
English
LU publication?
yes
id
003cba96-4049-461d-a2c2-6c239ed7fa36 (old id 1503762)
date added to LUP
2016-04-04 11:20:36
date last changed
2018-11-21 21:04:12
@article{003cba96-4049-461d-a2c2-6c239ed7fa36,
  abstract     = {Three arguments for the conclusion that objects cannot endure in B-time even if they remain intrinsically unchanged are examined: Carter and Hestevold’s enduring-objects-as-universals argument (American Philosophical Quarterly 31(4):269–283, 1994) and Barker and Dowe’s paradox 1 and paradox 2 (Analysis 63(2):106–114, 2003, Analysis 65(1):69–74, 2005). All three are shown to fail.},
  author       = {Hansson Wahlberg, Tobias},
  issn         = {1437-2053},
  language     = {eng},
  number       = {2},
  pages        = {175--183},
  publisher    = {Springer},
  series       = {Metaphysica},
  title        = {Endurance Per Se in B-time},
  url          = {https://lup.lub.lu.se/search/ws/files/5751378/4393987.pdf},
  doi          = {10.1007/s12133-009-0049-z},
  volume       = {10},
  year         = {2009},
}