Humanising the Nonhuman : An Ecocritical Toolbox for Anthropomorphic Agency
(2024) In Ecozon@ 15(2). p.173-188- Abstract
- Ecocriticism tends to acknowledge anthropomorphisms as a possible tool to create empathy for nonhumans, but in doing so mostly labels said tool as too sentimental for serious environmental literature. This paper aims to establish a categorisation of anthropomorphisms in media that allows a more diverse and detailed analysis of humanised nonhumans. It seeks to overcome the prevailing idea that anthropomorphic descriptions are limited to nonhuman animals and therefore extends the term to the humanisation of anything that is not human. Following the school of thought suggested by new materialism and material ecocriticism, nonhumans are regarded as having agency and anthropomorphising them allows humans to empathise with nonhumans. The... (More)
- Ecocriticism tends to acknowledge anthropomorphisms as a possible tool to create empathy for nonhumans, but in doing so mostly labels said tool as too sentimental for serious environmental literature. This paper aims to establish a categorisation of anthropomorphisms in media that allows a more diverse and detailed analysis of humanised nonhumans. It seeks to overcome the prevailing idea that anthropomorphic descriptions are limited to nonhuman animals and therefore extends the term to the humanisation of anything that is not human. Following the school of thought suggested by new materialism and material ecocriticism, nonhumans are regarded as having agency and anthropomorphising them allows humans to empathise with nonhumans. The categorisation of anthropomorphism proposed here is divided into each three markers and modes. The markers signify which part of the human can be observed in the anthropomorphised subject, while the modes define how this is realised. This article exemplifies the concept of markers and modes through anthropomorphic trees in literature, but as it is not a static concept, it allows for overlaps between categories and dynamic adaptations for other cases of anthropomorphised subjects. The three markers are Physicality, Sentience, and Language and may appear also in combinations. The modes are Projection, Manifestation, and Hybridity. As anthropomorphisms strongly intersect with theories of nonhuman agency, this, too, will be discussed in the final section of this article. (Less)
Please use this url to cite or link to this publication:
https://lup.lub.lu.se/record/01020ab5-9f50-40e4-b145-80762670b544
- author
- Kautz, Alissa LU
- publishing date
- 2024-10-30
- type
- Contribution to journal
- publication status
- published
- subject
- keywords
- anthropomorphism, material ecocriticism, nonhuman agency, trees
- in
- Ecozon@
- volume
- 15
- issue
- 2
- pages
- 16 pages
- DOI
- 10.37536/ECOZONA.2024.15.2.4813
- language
- English
- LU publication?
- no
- id
- 01020ab5-9f50-40e4-b145-80762670b544
- date added to LUP
- 2025-03-06 12:18:17
- date last changed
- 2025-03-20 09:58:04
@article{01020ab5-9f50-40e4-b145-80762670b544,
abstract = {{Ecocriticism tends to acknowledge anthropomorphisms as a possible tool to create empathy for nonhumans, but in doing so mostly labels said tool as too sentimental for serious environmental literature. This paper aims to establish a categorisation of anthropomorphisms in media that allows a more diverse and detailed analysis of humanised nonhumans. It seeks to overcome the prevailing idea that anthropomorphic descriptions are limited to nonhuman animals and therefore extends the term to the humanisation of anything that is not human. Following the school of thought suggested by new materialism and material ecocriticism, nonhumans are regarded as having agency and anthropomorphising them allows humans to empathise with nonhumans. The categorisation of anthropomorphism proposed here is divided into each three markers and modes. The markers signify which part of the human can be observed in the anthropomorphised subject, while the modes define how this is realised. This article exemplifies the concept of markers and modes through anthropomorphic trees in literature, but as it is not a static concept, it allows for overlaps between categories and dynamic adaptations for other cases of anthropomorphised subjects. The three markers are Physicality, Sentience, and Language and may appear also in combinations. The modes are Projection, Manifestation, and Hybridity. As anthropomorphisms strongly intersect with theories of nonhuman agency, this, too, will be discussed in the final section of this article.}},
author = {{Kautz, Alissa}},
keywords = {{anthropomorphism; material ecocriticism; nonhuman agency; trees}},
language = {{eng}},
month = {{10}},
number = {{2}},
pages = {{173--188}},
series = {{Ecozon@}},
title = {{Humanising the Nonhuman : An Ecocritical Toolbox for Anthropomorphic Agency}},
url = {{http://dx.doi.org/10.37536/ECOZONA.2024.15.2.4813}},
doi = {{10.37536/ECOZONA.2024.15.2.4813}},
volume = {{15}},
year = {{2024}},
}