Skip to main content

Lund University Publications

LUND UNIVERSITY LIBRARIES

Adherence trajectories of oral lipid-lowering therapy in patients with myocardial infarction and its estimated impact on low-density lipoprotein levels

Hagström, Emil ; Ortsäter, Gustaf ; Almlöf, Emil ; Vasilevska, Marija ; Leósdóttir, Margrét LU ; Wettermark, Björn ; Banefelt, Jonas and Larsen, Anders Peter (2025) In Clinical Research in Cardiology
Abstract

Background: Low adherence to lipid-lowering therapy (LLT) after myocardial infarction (MI) is associated with increased risk of recurrent cardiovascular events and death. However, little is known about long-term adherence patterns following treatment interruptions. The aim of this study was to describe adherence trajectories in MI patients following a LLT treatment gap, and model the impact of different adherence trajectories on estimated low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) levels. Methods: We conducted a retrospective cohort study of 22,124 first-time MI patients in Sweden who dispensed statins and/or ezetimibe within 90 days of their MI. Patients with a treatment gap > 90 days within three years post-MI were identified, and... (More)

Background: Low adherence to lipid-lowering therapy (LLT) after myocardial infarction (MI) is associated with increased risk of recurrent cardiovascular events and death. However, little is known about long-term adherence patterns following treatment interruptions. The aim of this study was to describe adherence trajectories in MI patients following a LLT treatment gap, and model the impact of different adherence trajectories on estimated low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) levels. Methods: We conducted a retrospective cohort study of 22,124 first-time MI patients in Sweden who dispensed statins and/or ezetimibe within 90 days of their MI. Patients with a treatment gap > 90 days within three years post-MI were identified, and adherence trajectories were evaluated over a five-year period following the treatment gap using group-based trajectory modelling. Associations between adherence trajectories and patient characteristics were analyzed, and the impact on estimated LDL-C levels was simulated based on trajectory-specific adherence. Results: Patients were categorized in six different adherence trajectories — constant adherent (34%), constant non-adherent (26%), rapidly (7%) and slowly (6%) increasing and rapidly (9%) and slowly (19%) decreasing adherence. Patients with a constant adherent trajectory were more often managed in primary care (compared to hospital care). Lower age and male sex were also associated with a constant adherent trajectory. The average LDL-C level in patients with a constant adherence trajectory was estimated to be 1.0 mmol/L lower compared to patients with a constant non-adherence trajectory. Conclusions: Suboptimal adherence following a treatment gap is common and has a clinically significant impact on the degree of LDL-C lowering.

(Less)
Please use this url to cite or link to this publication:
author
; ; ; ; ; ; and
organization
publishing date
type
Contribution to journal
publication status
epub
subject
keywords
Adherence, Group-based trajectory models, Lipid-lowering therapy, Myocardial infarction
in
Clinical Research in Cardiology
publisher
Springer Science and Business Media B.V.
external identifiers
  • pmid:41329241
  • scopus:105023870004
ISSN
1861-0684
DOI
10.1007/s00392-025-02791-5
language
English
LU publication?
yes
id
04691008-571e-4b8b-be12-b39758ed800b
date added to LUP
2025-12-19 13:15:46
date last changed
2025-12-19 13:16:46
@article{04691008-571e-4b8b-be12-b39758ed800b,
  abstract     = {{<p>Background: Low adherence to lipid-lowering therapy (LLT) after myocardial infarction (MI) is associated with increased risk of recurrent cardiovascular events and death. However, little is known about long-term adherence patterns following treatment interruptions. The aim of this study was to describe adherence trajectories in MI patients following a LLT treatment gap, and model the impact of different adherence trajectories on estimated low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) levels. Methods: We conducted a retrospective cohort study of 22,124 first-time MI patients in Sweden who dispensed statins and/or ezetimibe within 90 days of their MI. Patients with a treatment gap &gt; 90 days within three years post-MI were identified, and adherence trajectories were evaluated over a five-year period following the treatment gap using group-based trajectory modelling. Associations between adherence trajectories and patient characteristics were analyzed, and the impact on estimated LDL-C levels was simulated based on trajectory-specific adherence. Results: Patients were categorized in six different adherence trajectories — constant adherent (34%), constant non-adherent (26%), rapidly (7%) and slowly (6%) increasing and rapidly (9%) and slowly (19%) decreasing adherence. Patients with a constant adherent trajectory were more often managed in primary care (compared to hospital care). Lower age and male sex were also associated with a constant adherent trajectory. The average LDL-C level in patients with a constant adherence trajectory was estimated to be 1.0 mmol/L lower compared to patients with a constant non-adherence trajectory. Conclusions: Suboptimal adherence following a treatment gap is common and has a clinically significant impact on the degree of LDL-C lowering.</p>}},
  author       = {{Hagström, Emil and Ortsäter, Gustaf and Almlöf, Emil and Vasilevska, Marija and Leósdóttir, Margrét and Wettermark, Björn and Banefelt, Jonas and Larsen, Anders Peter}},
  issn         = {{1861-0684}},
  keywords     = {{Adherence; Group-based trajectory models; Lipid-lowering therapy; Myocardial infarction}},
  language     = {{eng}},
  publisher    = {{Springer Science and Business Media B.V.}},
  series       = {{Clinical Research in Cardiology}},
  title        = {{Adherence trajectories of oral lipid-lowering therapy in patients with myocardial infarction and its estimated impact on low-density lipoprotein levels}},
  url          = {{http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00392-025-02791-5}},
  doi          = {{10.1007/s00392-025-02791-5}},
  year         = {{2025}},
}