Skip to main content

Lund University Publications

LUND UNIVERSITY LIBRARIES

Validation of Plasma Amyloid-β 42/40 for Detecting Alzheimer Disease Amyloid Plaques

Li, Yan ; Schindler, Suzanne E. ; Bollinger, James G. ; Ovod, Vitaliy ; Mawuenyega, Kwasi G. ; Weiner, Michael W. ; Shaw, Leslie M. ; Masters, Colin L. ; Fowler, Christopher J. and Trojanowski, John Q. , et al. (2022) In Neurology 98(7). p.688-699
Abstract

Background and Objectives To determine the diagnostic accuracy of a plasma Aβ42/Aβ40 assay in classifying amyloid PET status across global research studies using samples collected by multiple centers that utilize different blood collection and processing protocols.MethodsPlasma samples (n = 465) were obtained from 3 large Alzheimer disease (AD) research cohorts in the United States (n = 182), Australia (n = 183), and Sweden (n = 100). Plasma Aβ42/Aβ40 was measured by a high precision immunoprecipitation mass spectrometry (IPMS) assay and compared to the reference standards of amyloid PET and CSF Aβ42/Aβ40.ResultsIn the combined cohort of 465 participants, plasma Aβ42/Aβ40 had good concordance with amyloid PET status (receiver operating... (More)

Background and Objectives To determine the diagnostic accuracy of a plasma Aβ42/Aβ40 assay in classifying amyloid PET status across global research studies using samples collected by multiple centers that utilize different blood collection and processing protocols.MethodsPlasma samples (n = 465) were obtained from 3 large Alzheimer disease (AD) research cohorts in the United States (n = 182), Australia (n = 183), and Sweden (n = 100). Plasma Aβ42/Aβ40 was measured by a high precision immunoprecipitation mass spectrometry (IPMS) assay and compared to the reference standards of amyloid PET and CSF Aβ42/Aβ40.ResultsIn the combined cohort of 465 participants, plasma Aβ42/Aβ40 had good concordance with amyloid PET status (receiver operating characteristic area under the curve [AUC] 0.84, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.80-0.87); concordance improved with the inclusion of APOE ϵ4 carrier status (AUC 0.88, 95% CI 0.85-0.91). The AUC of plasma Aβ42/Aβ40 with CSF amyloid status was 0.85 (95% CI 0.78-0.91) and improved to 0.93 (95% CI 0.89-0.97) with APOE ϵ4 status. These findings were consistent across the 3 cohorts, despite differences in protocols. The assay performed similarly in both cognitively unimpaired and impaired individuals.DiscussionPlasma Aβ42/Aβ40 is a robust measure for detecting amyloid plaques and can be utilized to aid in the diagnosis of AD, identify those at risk for future dementia due to AD, and improve the diversity of populations enrolled in AD research and clinical trials.Classification of EvidenceThis study provides Class II evidence that plasma Aβ42/Aβ40, as measured by a high precision IPMS assay, accurately diagnoses brain amyloidosis in both cognitively unimpaired and impaired research participants.

(Less)
Please use this url to cite or link to this publication:
author
; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; and , et al. (More)
; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; and (Less)
organization
publishing date
type
Contribution to journal
publication status
published
subject
in
Neurology
volume
98
issue
7
pages
688 - 699
publisher
Lippincott Williams & Wilkins
external identifiers
  • scopus:85124634004
  • pmid:34906975
ISSN
0028-3878
DOI
10.1212/WNL.0000000000013211
language
English
LU publication?
yes
id
04fb2f0c-3081-45f5-a601-58e763a75688
date added to LUP
2022-04-12 15:37:28
date last changed
2024-04-21 20:13:46
@article{04fb2f0c-3081-45f5-a601-58e763a75688,
  abstract     = {{<p>Background and Objectives To determine the diagnostic accuracy of a plasma Aβ42/Aβ40 assay in classifying amyloid PET status across global research studies using samples collected by multiple centers that utilize different blood collection and processing protocols.MethodsPlasma samples (n = 465) were obtained from 3 large Alzheimer disease (AD) research cohorts in the United States (n = 182), Australia (n = 183), and Sweden (n = 100). Plasma Aβ42/Aβ40 was measured by a high precision immunoprecipitation mass spectrometry (IPMS) assay and compared to the reference standards of amyloid PET and CSF Aβ42/Aβ40.ResultsIn the combined cohort of 465 participants, plasma Aβ42/Aβ40 had good concordance with amyloid PET status (receiver operating characteristic area under the curve [AUC] 0.84, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.80-0.87); concordance improved with the inclusion of APOE ϵ4 carrier status (AUC 0.88, 95% CI 0.85-0.91). The AUC of plasma Aβ42/Aβ40 with CSF amyloid status was 0.85 (95% CI 0.78-0.91) and improved to 0.93 (95% CI 0.89-0.97) with APOE ϵ4 status. These findings were consistent across the 3 cohorts, despite differences in protocols. The assay performed similarly in both cognitively unimpaired and impaired individuals.DiscussionPlasma Aβ42/Aβ40 is a robust measure for detecting amyloid plaques and can be utilized to aid in the diagnosis of AD, identify those at risk for future dementia due to AD, and improve the diversity of populations enrolled in AD research and clinical trials.Classification of EvidenceThis study provides Class II evidence that plasma Aβ42/Aβ40, as measured by a high precision IPMS assay, accurately diagnoses brain amyloidosis in both cognitively unimpaired and impaired research participants.</p>}},
  author       = {{Li, Yan and Schindler, Suzanne E. and Bollinger, James G. and Ovod, Vitaliy and Mawuenyega, Kwasi G. and Weiner, Michael W. and Shaw, Leslie M. and Masters, Colin L. and Fowler, Christopher J. and Trojanowski, John Q. and Korecka, Magdalena and Martins, Ralph N. and Janelidze, Shorena and Hansson, Oskar and Bateman, Randall J.}},
  issn         = {{0028-3878}},
  language     = {{eng}},
  number       = {{7}},
  pages        = {{688--699}},
  publisher    = {{Lippincott Williams & Wilkins}},
  series       = {{Neurology}},
  title        = {{Validation of Plasma Amyloid-β 42/40 for Detecting Alzheimer Disease Amyloid Plaques}},
  url          = {{http://dx.doi.org/10.1212/WNL.0000000000013211}},
  doi          = {{10.1212/WNL.0000000000013211}},
  volume       = {{98}},
  year         = {{2022}},
}