Skip to main content

Lund University Publications

LUND UNIVERSITY LIBRARIES

How proven is a 'proven intervention'? Ethics of placebo controls in light of conditional approval programs

Hug, Kristina LU orcid (2023) In Regenerative Medicine 18(7). p.561-572
Abstract

This article discusses the difficulties of establishing whether there exists a proven therapeutic intervention when regenerative experimental treatments are made accessible to patients under conditional approval programs (outside clinical trials). Conditional approvals are often made on the basis of less robust efficacy evidence than otherwise required for the registration of new treatments. Lower quality of evidence affects the ethical justification of using a placebo-control design. The absence of a proven intervention is important in evaluating whether it is ethically justifiable to use such a design in a clinical trial and is present in major ethical guidelines. The main argument in this paper is that conditionally approved... (More)

This article discusses the difficulties of establishing whether there exists a proven therapeutic intervention when regenerative experimental treatments are made accessible to patients under conditional approval programs (outside clinical trials). Conditional approvals are often made on the basis of less robust efficacy evidence than otherwise required for the registration of new treatments. Lower quality of evidence affects the ethical justification of using a placebo-control design. The absence of a proven intervention is important in evaluating whether it is ethically justifiable to use such a design in a clinical trial and is present in major ethical guidelines. The main argument in this paper is that conditionally approved therapies, if referred to as 'proven interventions', would make placebo-control design ethically unjustifiable. Conducting rigorous clinical trials after conditional approvals is crucial to establish the efficacy of therapeutic approaches under such approvals. Hindrances to running such trials and generating further efficacy evidence are brought to attention.

(Less)
Please use this url to cite or link to this publication:
author
organization
publishing date
type
Contribution to journal
publication status
published
subject
keywords
accelerated access, conditional approval, efficacy, ethics, randomized placebo-controlled trials, research
in
Regenerative Medicine
volume
18
issue
7
pages
12 pages
publisher
Future Medicine Ltd.
external identifiers
  • pmid:37340909
  • scopus:85164063946
ISSN
1746-0751
DOI
10.2217/rme-2022-0021
language
English
LU publication?
yes
id
055293fb-c66e-4e43-919d-2d69167d3ef0
date added to LUP
2023-09-15 11:43:43
date last changed
2024-04-20 03:26:07
@article{055293fb-c66e-4e43-919d-2d69167d3ef0,
  abstract     = {{<p>This article discusses the difficulties of establishing whether there exists a proven therapeutic intervention when regenerative experimental treatments are made accessible to patients under conditional approval programs (outside clinical trials). Conditional approvals are often made on the basis of less robust efficacy evidence than otherwise required for the registration of new treatments. Lower quality of evidence affects the ethical justification of using a placebo-control design. The absence of a proven intervention is important in evaluating whether it is ethically justifiable to use such a design in a clinical trial and is present in major ethical guidelines. The main argument in this paper is that conditionally approved therapies, if referred to as 'proven interventions', would make placebo-control design ethically unjustifiable. Conducting rigorous clinical trials after conditional approvals is crucial to establish the efficacy of therapeutic approaches under such approvals. Hindrances to running such trials and generating further efficacy evidence are brought to attention.</p>}},
  author       = {{Hug, Kristina}},
  issn         = {{1746-0751}},
  keywords     = {{accelerated access; conditional approval; efficacy; ethics; randomized placebo-controlled trials; research}},
  language     = {{eng}},
  number       = {{7}},
  pages        = {{561--572}},
  publisher    = {{Future Medicine Ltd.}},
  series       = {{Regenerative Medicine}},
  title        = {{How proven is a 'proven intervention'? Ethics of placebo controls in light of conditional approval programs}},
  url          = {{http://dx.doi.org/10.2217/rme-2022-0021}},
  doi          = {{10.2217/rme-2022-0021}},
  volume       = {{18}},
  year         = {{2023}},
}