Skip to main content

Lund University Publications

LUND UNIVERSITY LIBRARIES

Postoperative pain treatment after spinal fusion surgery : A systematic review with meta-analyses and trial sequential analyses

Geisler, Anja LU orcid ; Zachodnik, Josephine LU ; Køppen, Kasper ; Chakari, Rehan and Bech-Azeddine, Rachid (2022) In Pain Reports 7(3). p.1005-1005
Abstract

Patients undergoing spinal surgery are at high risk of acute and persistent postoperative pain. Therefore, adequate pain relief is crucial. This systematic review aimed to provide answers about best-proven postoperative analgesic treatment for patients undergoing lumbar 1- or 2-level fusions for degenerative spine diseases. We performed a search in PubMed, Embase, and The Cochrane Library for randomized controlled trials. The primary outcome was opioid consumption after 24 hours postoperatively. We performed meta-analyses, trial sequential analyses, and Grading of Recommendations assessment to accommodate systematic errors. Forty-four randomized controlled trials were included with 2983 participants. Five subgroups emerged: nonsteroidal... (More)

Patients undergoing spinal surgery are at high risk of acute and persistent postoperative pain. Therefore, adequate pain relief is crucial. This systematic review aimed to provide answers about best-proven postoperative analgesic treatment for patients undergoing lumbar 1- or 2-level fusions for degenerative spine diseases. We performed a search in PubMed, Embase, and The Cochrane Library for randomized controlled trials. The primary outcome was opioid consumption after 24 hours postoperatively. We performed meta-analyses, trial sequential analyses, and Grading of Recommendations assessment to accommodate systematic errors. Forty-four randomized controlled trials were included with 2983 participants. Five subgroups emerged: nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs), epidural, ketamine, local infiltration analgesia, and intrathecal morphine. The results showed a significant reduction in opioid consumption for treatment with NSAID (P < 0.0008) and epidural (P < 0.0006) (predefined minimal clinical relevance of 10 mg). Concerning secondary outcomes, significant reductions in pain scores were detected after 6 hours at rest (NSAID [P < 0.0001] and intrathecal morphine [P < 0.0001]), 6 hours during mobilization (intrathecal morphine [P = 0.003]), 24 hours at rest (epidural [P < 0.00001] and ketamine [P < 0.00001]), and 24 hours during mobilization (intrathecal morphine [P = 0.03]). The effect of wound infiltration was nonsignificant. The quality of evidence was low to very low for most trials. The results from this systematic review showed that some analgesic interventions have the capability to reduce opioid consumption compared with control groups. However, because of the high risk of bias and low evidence, it was impossible to recommend a "gold standard" for the analgesic treatment after 1- or 2-level spinal fusion surgery.

(Less)
Please use this url to cite or link to this publication:
author
; ; ; and
organization
publishing date
type
Contribution to journal
publication status
published
subject
keywords
Analgesics, Pain, Pain treatment, Spinal fusion
in
Pain Reports
volume
7
issue
3
pages
1005 - 1005
publisher
Lippincott Williams & Wilkins
external identifiers
  • scopus:85132678964
  • pmid:35505790
ISSN
2471-2531
DOI
10.1097/PR9.0000000000001005
language
English
LU publication?
yes
id
086e4428-79fa-40e2-9035-e380213c691f
date added to LUP
2022-09-13 11:24:24
date last changed
2024-06-13 19:19:43
@article{086e4428-79fa-40e2-9035-e380213c691f,
  abstract     = {{<p>Patients undergoing spinal surgery are at high risk of acute and persistent postoperative pain. Therefore, adequate pain relief is crucial. This systematic review aimed to provide answers about best-proven postoperative analgesic treatment for patients undergoing lumbar 1- or 2-level fusions for degenerative spine diseases. We performed a search in PubMed, Embase, and The Cochrane Library for randomized controlled trials. The primary outcome was opioid consumption after 24 hours postoperatively. We performed meta-analyses, trial sequential analyses, and Grading of Recommendations assessment to accommodate systematic errors. Forty-four randomized controlled trials were included with 2983 participants. Five subgroups emerged: nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs), epidural, ketamine, local infiltration analgesia, and intrathecal morphine. The results showed a significant reduction in opioid consumption for treatment with NSAID (P &lt; 0.0008) and epidural (P &lt; 0.0006) (predefined minimal clinical relevance of 10 mg). Concerning secondary outcomes, significant reductions in pain scores were detected after 6 hours at rest (NSAID [P &lt; 0.0001] and intrathecal morphine [P &lt; 0.0001]), 6 hours during mobilization (intrathecal morphine [P = 0.003]), 24 hours at rest (epidural [P &lt; 0.00001] and ketamine [P &lt; 0.00001]), and 24 hours during mobilization (intrathecal morphine [P = 0.03]). The effect of wound infiltration was nonsignificant. The quality of evidence was low to very low for most trials. The results from this systematic review showed that some analgesic interventions have the capability to reduce opioid consumption compared with control groups. However, because of the high risk of bias and low evidence, it was impossible to recommend a "gold standard" for the analgesic treatment after 1- or 2-level spinal fusion surgery.</p>}},
  author       = {{Geisler, Anja and Zachodnik, Josephine and Køppen, Kasper and Chakari, Rehan and Bech-Azeddine, Rachid}},
  issn         = {{2471-2531}},
  keywords     = {{Analgesics; Pain; Pain treatment; Spinal fusion}},
  language     = {{eng}},
  month        = {{05}},
  number       = {{3}},
  pages        = {{1005--1005}},
  publisher    = {{Lippincott Williams & Wilkins}},
  series       = {{Pain Reports}},
  title        = {{Postoperative pain treatment after spinal fusion surgery : A systematic review with meta-analyses and trial sequential analyses}},
  url          = {{http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/PR9.0000000000001005}},
  doi          = {{10.1097/PR9.0000000000001005}},
  volume       = {{7}},
  year         = {{2022}},
}