Qualitative observations in university physics laboratories : an example from classical mechanics
Dunnett, K. LU and Magnusson, M. H. LU
(2025)
In European Journal of Physics
46(4).
- Abstract
One of the key skills of any scientist is noticing what’s going on. Both in the experiment one’s performing and in one’s data: is there something interesting, reason to doubt one’s data or suspect that one’s theoretical description is insufficient? Many experiments developed for undergraduate teaching still focus on quantitative evaluation. Here we take a different approach where careful observation identifies the interesting qualitative behaviour of a ball dropped with a water bottle balanced on top of it, but where numerical agreement with a simple theoretical model is impossible. Thus ‘success’ occurs when students are satisfied with their efforts and the development of their experimental process. Laboratory note keeping can also be... (More)
One of the key skills of any scientist is noticing what’s going on. Both in the experiment one’s performing and in one’s data: is there something interesting, reason to doubt one’s data or suspect that one’s theoretical description is insufficient? Many experiments developed for undergraduate teaching still focus on quantitative evaluation. Here we take a different approach where careful observation identifies the interesting qualitative behaviour of a ball dropped with a water bottle balanced on top of it, but where numerical agreement with a simple theoretical model is impossible. Thus ‘success’ occurs when students are satisfied with their efforts and the development of their experimental process. Laboratory note keeping can also be introduced in a meaningful, non-formulaic way since students are making independent observations and method changes. We describe pedagogical and didactic considerations for implementing this experiment and others like it as part of an introduction to practical work in physics, including variations and extensions, and give examples of experimental outcomes. We suggest that considering qualitative behaviour may be a fruitful strategy for identifying experiments that are both amenable to student autonomy and embedding skills such as laboratory note keeping in a flexible and genuine way.
(Less)
- author
- Dunnett, K.
LU
and Magnusson, M. H.
LU
- organization
- publishing date
- 2025-07-31
- type
- Contribution to journal
- publication status
- published
- subject
- keywords
- laboratories, mechanics, notebooks, observation
- in
- European Journal of Physics
- volume
- 46
- issue
- 4
- article number
- 045005
- publisher
- IOP Publishing
- external identifiers
-
- scopus:105011372936
- ISSN
- 0143-0807
- DOI
- 10.1088/1361-6404/adec27
- language
- English
- LU publication?
- yes
- additional info
- Publisher Copyright: © 2025 The Author(s). Published on behalf of the European Physical Society by IOP Publishing Ltd.
- id
- 0acb57e8-213a-4ccf-ac9e-e2062ddc961e
- date added to LUP
- 2025-12-04 13:12:24
- date last changed
- 2025-12-04 13:13:12
@article{0acb57e8-213a-4ccf-ac9e-e2062ddc961e,
abstract = {{<p>One of the key skills of any scientist is noticing what’s going on. Both in the experiment one’s performing and in one’s data: is there something interesting, reason to doubt one’s data or suspect that one’s theoretical description is insufficient? Many experiments developed for undergraduate teaching still focus on quantitative evaluation. Here we take a different approach where careful observation identifies the interesting qualitative behaviour of a ball dropped with a water bottle balanced on top of it, but where numerical agreement with a simple theoretical model is impossible. Thus ‘success’ occurs when students are satisfied with their efforts and the development of their experimental process. Laboratory note keeping can also be introduced in a meaningful, non-formulaic way since students are making independent observations and method changes. We describe pedagogical and didactic considerations for implementing this experiment and others like it as part of an introduction to practical work in physics, including variations and extensions, and give examples of experimental outcomes. We suggest that considering qualitative behaviour may be a fruitful strategy for identifying experiments that are both amenable to student autonomy and embedding skills such as laboratory note keeping in a flexible and genuine way.</p>}},
author = {{Dunnett, K. and Magnusson, M. H.}},
issn = {{0143-0807}},
keywords = {{laboratories; mechanics; notebooks; observation}},
language = {{eng}},
month = {{07}},
number = {{4}},
publisher = {{IOP Publishing}},
series = {{European Journal of Physics}},
title = {{Qualitative observations in university physics laboratories : an example from classical mechanics}},
url = {{http://dx.doi.org/10.1088/1361-6404/adec27}},
doi = {{10.1088/1361-6404/adec27}},
volume = {{46}},
year = {{2025}},
}