Skip to main content

Lund University Publications

LUND UNIVERSITY LIBRARIES

Incidence of distal radius fracture in a general population in southern Sweden in 2016 compared with 2001

Ali, M. LU orcid ; Eiriksdottir, A. ; Murtadha, M. ; Åkesson, A. and Atroshi, I. LU (2020) In Osteoporosis International 31(4). p.715-720
Abstract

Summary: In this population-based study, we compared the incidence of distal radius fracture in 2016 with that in the same region’s adult general population in 2001 using radiographs to identify fracture cases. We showed that the incidence decreased by 24% in 2016 compared with 2001 indicating an important development. Introduction: We conducted an epidemiological study on residents of northeastern Skåne in southern Sweden (population 182,000) to determine the overall incidence of distal radius fracture and the incidence according to age, sex, and fracture characteristics in the region’s adult population during 2016, and to study the change in incidence in the same general population between 2001 and 2016 using wrist radiographs to... (More)

Summary: In this population-based study, we compared the incidence of distal radius fracture in 2016 with that in the same region’s adult general population in 2001 using radiographs to identify fracture cases. We showed that the incidence decreased by 24% in 2016 compared with 2001 indicating an important development. Introduction: We conducted an epidemiological study on residents of northeastern Skåne in southern Sweden (population 182,000) to determine the overall incidence of distal radius fracture and the incidence according to age, sex, and fracture characteristics in the region’s adult population during 2016, and to study the change in incidence in the same general population between 2001 and 2016 using wrist radiographs to identify fracture cases. Methods: Two orthopedic surgeons examined all wrist radiographs performed at the only two emergency hospitals in the study region to identify individuals, above 18 years of age, who sustained fracture of the distal radius during 2016. We used Poisson regression analysis adjusting for age, sex, and at-risk population to compare the incidence in 2016 with the incidence in 2001, previously estimated using similar methodology. Results: The overall incidence in 2016 was 22 (95% CI 20–25) per 10,000; the incidence in women was 34 (95% CI 30–39) and in men was 10 (95% CI 8–12) per 10,000. The overall incidence in 2016 was 0.76 (95% CI 0.70–0.82) of the incidence in 2001 (p < 0.0001). The incidence in the 3 age groups 19–49, 50–79, and ≥ 80 years was 0.91 (95% CI, 0.69–1.20), 0.67 (95% CI, 0.55–0.82), and 0.49 (95% CI, 0.25–0.97) of the incidence in 2001, respectively. Conclusion: In a general population in Sweden, a statistically significant and clinically important decrease in the incidence of distal radius fracture occurred between 2001 and 2016, driven by lower incidence in individuals 50 years or older.

(Less)
Please use this url to cite or link to this publication:
author
; ; ; and
organization
publishing date
type
Contribution to journal
publication status
published
subject
keywords
Fracture incidence assessment, Fracture prevention, General population studies, Osteoporosis, Radiology
in
Osteoporosis International
volume
31
issue
4
pages
6 pages
publisher
Springer
external identifiers
  • scopus:85077865618
  • pmid:31930451
ISSN
0937-941X
DOI
10.1007/s00198-020-05282-7
language
English
LU publication?
yes
id
0bd508d1-303b-452e-ac53-668f3f9a8fdb
date added to LUP
2021-01-11 23:06:20
date last changed
2024-04-17 23:57:36
@article{0bd508d1-303b-452e-ac53-668f3f9a8fdb,
  abstract     = {{<p>Summary: In this population-based study, we compared the incidence of distal radius fracture in 2016 with that in the same region’s adult general population in 2001 using radiographs to identify fracture cases. We showed that the incidence decreased by 24% in 2016 compared with 2001 indicating an important development. Introduction: We conducted an epidemiological study on residents of northeastern Skåne in southern Sweden (population 182,000) to determine the overall incidence of distal radius fracture and the incidence according to age, sex, and fracture characteristics in the region’s adult population during 2016, and to study the change in incidence in the same general population between 2001 and 2016 using wrist radiographs to identify fracture cases. Methods: Two orthopedic surgeons examined all wrist radiographs performed at the only two emergency hospitals in the study region to identify individuals, above 18 years of age, who sustained fracture of the distal radius during 2016. We used Poisson regression analysis adjusting for age, sex, and at-risk population to compare the incidence in 2016 with the incidence in 2001, previously estimated using similar methodology. Results: The overall incidence in 2016 was 22 (95% CI 20–25) per 10,000; the incidence in women was 34 (95% CI 30–39) and in men was 10 (95% CI 8–12) per 10,000. The overall incidence in 2016 was 0.76 (95% CI 0.70–0.82) of the incidence in 2001 (p &lt; 0.0001). The incidence in the 3 age groups 19–49, 50–79, and ≥ 80 years was 0.91 (95% CI, 0.69–1.20), 0.67 (95% CI, 0.55–0.82), and 0.49 (95% CI, 0.25–0.97) of the incidence in 2001, respectively. Conclusion: In a general population in Sweden, a statistically significant and clinically important decrease in the incidence of distal radius fracture occurred between 2001 and 2016, driven by lower incidence in individuals 50 years or older.</p>}},
  author       = {{Ali, M. and Eiriksdottir, A. and Murtadha, M. and Åkesson, A. and Atroshi, I.}},
  issn         = {{0937-941X}},
  keywords     = {{Fracture incidence assessment; Fracture prevention; General population studies; Osteoporosis; Radiology}},
  language     = {{eng}},
  month        = {{04}},
  number       = {{4}},
  pages        = {{715--720}},
  publisher    = {{Springer}},
  series       = {{Osteoporosis International}},
  title        = {{Incidence of distal radius fracture in a general population in southern Sweden in 2016 compared with 2001}},
  url          = {{http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00198-020-05282-7}},
  doi          = {{10.1007/s00198-020-05282-7}},
  volume       = {{31}},
  year         = {{2020}},
}