Eco-evolutionary dynamics further weakens mutualistic interaction and coexistence under population decline
Weinbach, Avril LU
; Loeuille, Nicolas
and Rohr, Rudolf P.
(2022)
In Evolutionary Ecology
36(3).
p.373-387
- Abstract
With current environmental changes, evolution can rescue declining populations, but what happens to their interacting species? Mutualistic interactions can help species sustain each other when their environment worsens. However, mutualism is often costly to maintain, and evolution might counter-select it when not profitable enough. We investigate how the evolution of the investment in a mutualistic interaction by a focal species affects the persistence of the system. Specifically, using eco-evolutionary dynamics, we study the evolution of the focal species investment in the mutualistic interaction of a focal species (e.g. plant attractiveness via flower or nectar production for pollinators or carbon exudate for mycorrhizal fungi), and... (More)
With current environmental changes, evolution can rescue declining populations, but what happens to their interacting species? Mutualistic interactions can help species sustain each other when their environment worsens. However, mutualism is often costly to maintain, and evolution might counter-select it when not profitable enough. We investigate how the evolution of the investment in a mutualistic interaction by a focal species affects the persistence of the system. Specifically, using eco-evolutionary dynamics, we study the evolution of the focal species investment in the mutualistic interaction of a focal species (e.g. plant attractiveness via flower or nectar production for pollinators or carbon exudate for mycorrhizal fungi), and how it is affected by the decline of the partner population with which it is interacting. We assume an allocation trade-off so that investment in the mutualistic interaction reduces the species intrinsic growth rate. First, we investigate how evolution changes species persistence, biomass production, and the intensity of the mutualistic interaction. We show that concave trade-offs allow evolutionary convergence to stable coexistence. We next assume an external disturbance that decreases the partner population by lowering its intrinsic growth rate. Such declines result in the evolution of lower investment of the focal species in the mutualistic interaction, which eventually leads to the extinction of the partner species. With asymmetric mutualism favouring the partner, the evolutionary disappearance of the mutualistic interaction is delayed. Our results suggest that evolution may account for the current collapse of some mutualistic systems like plant-pollinator ones, and that restoration attempts should be enforced early enough to prevent potential negative effects driven by evolution.
(Less)
- author
- Weinbach, Avril
LU
; Loeuille, Nicolas
and Rohr, Rudolf P.
- publishing date
- 2022-06
- type
- Contribution to journal
- publication status
- published
- keywords
- Adaptive dynamics, Alternative stable states, Asymmetrical interactions, Evolutionary murder, Plant attractiveness, Pollinators decline
- in
- Evolutionary Ecology
- volume
- 36
- issue
- 3
- pages
- 15 pages
- publisher
- Springer
- external identifiers
-
- scopus:85127966193
- ISSN
- 0269-7653
- DOI
- 10.1007/s10682-022-10176-7
- language
- English
- LU publication?
- no
- additional info
- Publisher Copyright: © 2022, The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer Nature Switzerland AG.
- id
- 0bd54248-eafc-4c27-88ff-4bf8e35d397a
- date added to LUP
- 2024-07-24 16:22:41
- date last changed
- 2025-03-06 14:09:51
@article{0bd54248-eafc-4c27-88ff-4bf8e35d397a,
abstract = {{<p>With current environmental changes, evolution can rescue declining populations, but what happens to their interacting species? Mutualistic interactions can help species sustain each other when their environment worsens. However, mutualism is often costly to maintain, and evolution might counter-select it when not profitable enough. We investigate how the evolution of the investment in a mutualistic interaction by a focal species affects the persistence of the system. Specifically, using eco-evolutionary dynamics, we study the evolution of the focal species investment in the mutualistic interaction of a focal species (e.g. plant attractiveness via flower or nectar production for pollinators or carbon exudate for mycorrhizal fungi), and how it is affected by the decline of the partner population with which it is interacting. We assume an allocation trade-off so that investment in the mutualistic interaction reduces the species intrinsic growth rate. First, we investigate how evolution changes species persistence, biomass production, and the intensity of the mutualistic interaction. We show that concave trade-offs allow evolutionary convergence to stable coexistence. We next assume an external disturbance that decreases the partner population by lowering its intrinsic growth rate. Such declines result in the evolution of lower investment of the focal species in the mutualistic interaction, which eventually leads to the extinction of the partner species. With asymmetric mutualism favouring the partner, the evolutionary disappearance of the mutualistic interaction is delayed. Our results suggest that evolution may account for the current collapse of some mutualistic systems like plant-pollinator ones, and that restoration attempts should be enforced early enough to prevent potential negative effects driven by evolution.</p>}},
author = {{Weinbach, Avril and Loeuille, Nicolas and Rohr, Rudolf P.}},
issn = {{0269-7653}},
keywords = {{Adaptive dynamics; Alternative stable states; Asymmetrical interactions; Evolutionary murder; Plant attractiveness; Pollinators decline}},
language = {{eng}},
number = {{3}},
pages = {{373--387}},
publisher = {{Springer}},
series = {{Evolutionary Ecology}},
title = {{Eco-evolutionary dynamics further weakens mutualistic interaction and coexistence under population decline}},
url = {{http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10682-022-10176-7}},
doi = {{10.1007/s10682-022-10176-7}},
volume = {{36}},
year = {{2022}},
}