Advanced

Cumulative revision rate with the Scan Hip Classic I total hip prosthesis. 1,660 cases followed for 2-12 years

Kesteris, U; Robertsson, Otto LU ; Wingstrand, H and Onnerfalt, R (1998) In Acta Orthopaedica Scandinavica 69(2). p.133-137
Abstract
We analyzed the cumulative revision rate in 1,474 patients (1,660 hips) operated on with a cemented Scan Hip Classic I prosthesis from November 1983 to January 1994 at Lund University Hospital. The revision rate was analyzed for 3 diagnoses--arthrosis, rheumatoid arthritis and complication after a hip fracture--and for 2 head diameters--22 and 32 mm. Until January 1996, 36 hips were revised: 31 because of aseptic loosening, 3 because of dislocation and 2 because of infection. The overall revision rate was 5.6% after 10 years and was similar in arthrosis, rheumatoid arthritis and fracture cases. Due to revisions because of dislocation in the 22 mm group, the total revision rate was lower in the 32 mm group (p = 0.03).
Please use this url to cite or link to this publication:
author
organization
publishing date
type
Contribution to journal
publication status
published
subject
in
Acta Orthopaedica Scandinavica
volume
69
issue
2
pages
133 - 137
publisher
Taylor & Francis
external identifiers
  • pmid:9602769
  • scopus:0031945393
ISSN
0001-6470
DOI
10.3109/17453679809117613
language
English
LU publication?
yes
id
f9231c9a-3de1-438c-a866-c05154f908a5 (old id 1113854)
date added to LUP
2008-07-16 12:31:18
date last changed
2017-01-01 06:44:37
@article{f9231c9a-3de1-438c-a866-c05154f908a5,
  abstract     = {We analyzed the cumulative revision rate in 1,474 patients (1,660 hips) operated on with a cemented Scan Hip Classic I prosthesis from November 1983 to January 1994 at Lund University Hospital. The revision rate was analyzed for 3 diagnoses--arthrosis, rheumatoid arthritis and complication after a hip fracture--and for 2 head diameters--22 and 32 mm. Until January 1996, 36 hips were revised: 31 because of aseptic loosening, 3 because of dislocation and 2 because of infection. The overall revision rate was 5.6% after 10 years and was similar in arthrosis, rheumatoid arthritis and fracture cases. Due to revisions because of dislocation in the 22 mm group, the total revision rate was lower in the 32 mm group (p = 0.03).},
  author       = {Kesteris, U and Robertsson, Otto and Wingstrand, H and Onnerfalt, R},
  issn         = {0001-6470},
  language     = {eng},
  number       = {2},
  pages        = {133--137},
  publisher    = {Taylor & Francis},
  series       = {Acta Orthopaedica Scandinavica},
  title        = {Cumulative revision rate with the Scan Hip Classic I total hip prosthesis. 1,660 cases followed for 2-12 years},
  url          = {http://dx.doi.org/10.3109/17453679809117613},
  volume       = {69},
  year         = {1998},
}