Advanced

Satisfaction with Daily Occupations (SDO): construct validity and test-retest reliability of a screening tool for people with mental disorders

Eklund, Mona LU and Gunnarsson, Birgitta LU (2007) In Australian Occupational Therapy Journal 54(1). p.59-65
Abstract
Background/Aim: In occupational therapy research and in clinical practice there is a need for valid, reliable and easily administered measures. For research and screening purposes, the Satisfaction with Daily Occupations (SDO) instrument was developed. It addresses work, leisure, domestic tasks and self-care and generates a satisfaction and an activity level score. This study investigated its construct validity, internal consistency and test–retest reliability in 55 clients visiting occupational therapists in outpatient mental health care.



Methods: The SDO was administered on two occasions with a 1-week interval, and data on the Canadian Occupational Performance Measure (COPM), psychosocial functioning and self-rated... (More)
Background/Aim: In occupational therapy research and in clinical practice there is a need for valid, reliable and easily administered measures. For research and screening purposes, the Satisfaction with Daily Occupations (SDO) instrument was developed. It addresses work, leisure, domestic tasks and self-care and generates a satisfaction and an activity level score. This study investigated its construct validity, internal consistency and test–retest reliability in 55 clients visiting occupational therapists in outpatient mental health care.



Methods: The SDO was administered on two occasions with a 1-week interval, and data on the Canadian Occupational Performance Measure (COPM), psychosocial functioning and self-rated health were collected on the first of these occasions.



Results: In contrast to what was expected, the relationships between the SDO scores and the COPM scores were low. The strongest relationship between the SDO satisfaction score and any other variable was to psychosocial functioning. These variables shared 23% of the variance. Internal consistency for the satisfaction score was acceptable, alpha = 0.75 on the second occasion, and the test–retest reliability was good; rs = 0.84 for the satisfaction score and rs = 0.92 for the activity level.



Conclusions: The results indicated that the SDO has satisfactory reliability. The instrument targets a specific construct, as compared to the COPM and the measurements of self-rated health and psychosocial functioning. Thus, the SDO and the COPM satisfaction scale seem to assess different phenomena, probably because the SDO has predefined items, not specifically targeting a certain client's problematic occupations, whereas the COPM is based on self-defined problems. The instruments may therefore supplement each other. (Less)
Please use this url to cite or link to this publication:
author
and
organization
publishing date
type
Contribution to journal
publication status
published
subject
keywords
psychiatry, measurement, occupational therapy, mental health
in
Australian Occupational Therapy Journal
volume
54
issue
1
pages
59 - 65
publisher
Australian Association of occupational therapists
external identifiers
  • wos:000253888800009
  • scopus:33947401852
ISSN
1440-1630
DOI
10.1111/j.1440-1630.2006.00586.x
language
English
LU publication?
yes
additional info
The information about affiliations in this record was updated in December 2015. The record was previously connected to the following departments: Division of Occupational Therapy (Closed 2012) (013025000)
id
de988dd0-d0a7-4a78-b071-c84719e4d7a5 (old id 1139910)
date added to LUP
2016-04-01 17:00:51
date last changed
2020-12-15 03:37:31
@article{de988dd0-d0a7-4a78-b071-c84719e4d7a5,
  abstract     = {Background/Aim: In occupational therapy research and in clinical practice there is a need for valid, reliable and easily administered measures. For research and screening purposes, the Satisfaction with Daily Occupations (SDO) instrument was developed. It addresses work, leisure, domestic tasks and self-care and generates a satisfaction and an activity level score. This study investigated its construct validity, internal consistency and test–retest reliability in 55 clients visiting occupational therapists in outpatient mental health care.<br/><br>
<br/><br>
Methods: The SDO was administered on two occasions with a 1-week interval, and data on the Canadian Occupational Performance Measure (COPM), psychosocial functioning and self-rated health were collected on the first of these occasions.<br/><br>
<br/><br>
Results: In contrast to what was expected, the relationships between the SDO scores and the COPM scores were low. The strongest relationship between the SDO satisfaction score and any other variable was to psychosocial functioning. These variables shared 23% of the variance. Internal consistency for the satisfaction score was acceptable, alpha = 0.75 on the second occasion, and the test–retest reliability was good; rs = 0.84 for the satisfaction score and rs = 0.92 for the activity level.<br/><br>
<br/><br>
Conclusions: The results indicated that the SDO has satisfactory reliability. The instrument targets a specific construct, as compared to the COPM and the measurements of self-rated health and psychosocial functioning. Thus, the SDO and the COPM satisfaction scale seem to assess different phenomena, probably because the SDO has predefined items, not specifically targeting a certain client's problematic occupations, whereas the COPM is based on self-defined problems. The instruments may therefore supplement each other.},
  author       = {Eklund, Mona and Gunnarsson, Birgitta},
  issn         = {1440-1630},
  language     = {eng},
  number       = {1},
  pages        = {59--65},
  publisher    = {Australian Association of occupational therapists},
  series       = {Australian Occupational Therapy Journal},
  title        = {Satisfaction with Daily Occupations (SDO): construct validity and test-retest reliability of a screening tool for people with mental disorders},
  url          = {http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1440-1630.2006.00586.x},
  doi          = {10.1111/j.1440-1630.2006.00586.x},
  volume       = {54},
  year         = {2007},
}