Advanced

A philosophical account of interventions and causal representation in nursing research : a discussion paper

Persson, Johannes LU and Sahlin, Nils-Eric LU (2009) In International Journal of Nursing Studies 46(4). p.547-556
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Representing is about theories and theory formation. Philosophy of science has a long-standing interest in representing. At least since Ian Hacking's modern classic Representing and Intervening (1983) analytical philosophers have struggled to combine that interest with a study of the roles of intervention studies. With few exceptions this focus of philosophy of science has been on physics and other natural sciences. In particular, there have been few attempts to analyse the use of the notion of intervention in other disciplines where intervention studies are important, such as in nursing research. One unintended consequence of this is that the relations between representing and intervening tend to be less understood outside the... (More)
BACKGROUND: Representing is about theories and theory formation. Philosophy of science has a long-standing interest in representing. At least since Ian Hacking's modern classic Representing and Intervening (1983) analytical philosophers have struggled to combine that interest with a study of the roles of intervention studies. With few exceptions this focus of philosophy of science has been on physics and other natural sciences. In particular, there have been few attempts to analyse the use of the notion of intervention in other disciplines where intervention studies are important, such as in nursing research. One unintended consequence of this is that the relations between representing and intervening tend to be less understood outside the natural sciences. OBJECTIVES AND DESIGN: This article highlights a number of possible topics on which nursing science and analytic philosophy of science can fruitfully interact. The basic idea is simple. Building on a characterisation of interventions in terms of (i) what is intervened on and (ii) with respect to what, we suggest that interventions in nursing research typically are a blend of varieties belonging to the three dimensions of agency, epistemology, and ontology. The details of the blend determine the relation of the particular intervention study to traditional representational categories such as inductivism and hypothetico-deductive method, and have a bearing on its explanatory power and other more theory independent features of research as well. The framework we suggest should be relevant for nurse researchers who want to adopt a more general and analytically entrenched perspective on representing and intervening than the methodological boundaries in nursing research typically allow. (Less)
Please use this url to cite or link to this publication:
author
organization
publishing date
type
Contribution to journal
publication status
published
subject
keywords
Intervention, Induction, Hypothetico-deductive method, Explanation, Philosophy of science, Theory
in
International Journal of Nursing Studies
volume
46
issue
4
pages
547 - 556
publisher
Elsevier
external identifiers
  • wos:000265164900013
  • pmid:19166998
  • scopus:62549155723
ISSN
1873-491X
DOI
10.1016/j.ijnurstu.2008.11.008
language
English
LU publication?
yes
id
337142ac-7e94-4b20-b58e-f77aed31024f (old id 1289310)
alternative location
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/19166998?dopt=Abstract
date added to LUP
2009-02-06 13:04:09
date last changed
2017-01-01 04:53:21
@article{337142ac-7e94-4b20-b58e-f77aed31024f,
  abstract     = {BACKGROUND: Representing is about theories and theory formation. Philosophy of science has a long-standing interest in representing. At least since Ian Hacking's modern classic Representing and Intervening (1983) analytical philosophers have struggled to combine that interest with a study of the roles of intervention studies. With few exceptions this focus of philosophy of science has been on physics and other natural sciences. In particular, there have been few attempts to analyse the use of the notion of intervention in other disciplines where intervention studies are important, such as in nursing research. One unintended consequence of this is that the relations between representing and intervening tend to be less understood outside the natural sciences. OBJECTIVES AND DESIGN: This article highlights a number of possible topics on which nursing science and analytic philosophy of science can fruitfully interact. The basic idea is simple. Building on a characterisation of interventions in terms of (i) what is intervened on and (ii) with respect to what, we suggest that interventions in nursing research typically are a blend of varieties belonging to the three dimensions of agency, epistemology, and ontology. The details of the blend determine the relation of the particular intervention study to traditional representational categories such as inductivism and hypothetico-deductive method, and have a bearing on its explanatory power and other more theory independent features of research as well. The framework we suggest should be relevant for nurse researchers who want to adopt a more general and analytically entrenched perspective on representing and intervening than the methodological boundaries in nursing research typically allow.},
  author       = {Persson, Johannes and Sahlin, Nils-Eric},
  issn         = {1873-491X},
  keyword      = {Intervention,Induction,Hypothetico-deductive method,Explanation,Philosophy of science,Theory},
  language     = {eng},
  number       = {4},
  pages        = {547--556},
  publisher    = {Elsevier},
  series       = {International Journal of Nursing Studies},
  title        = {A philosophical account of interventions and causal representation in nursing research : a discussion paper},
  url          = {http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ijnurstu.2008.11.008},
  volume       = {46},
  year         = {2009},
}