Assessment of dependence in daily activities combined with a self-rating of difficulty.
(2009) In Journal of rehabilitation medicine : official journal of the UEMS European Board of Physical and Rehabilitation Medicine 41(3). p.150-156- Abstract
- OBJECTIVE: To study the information gained by extending a well-established instrument of dependence/independence in activities of daily living with a self-rating of difficulty, and to illustrate the relevance and usefulness of this combined approach with cross-national data. DESIGN AND SUBJECTS: Cross-sectional survey study data collected with 1918 very old persons in 5 European countries. METHODS: The "ADL staircase assessment" of dependence/independence, extended with a self-rating of difficulty, was administered at home visits. Data distribution in the 5 national samples and analyses with or without use of the self-rating data were carried out. RESULTS: High proportions of the subjects were independent in most of the activities... (More)
- OBJECTIVE: To study the information gained by extending a well-established instrument of dependence/independence in activities of daily living with a self-rating of difficulty, and to illustrate the relevance and usefulness of this combined approach with cross-national data. DESIGN AND SUBJECTS: Cross-sectional survey study data collected with 1918 very old persons in 5 European countries. METHODS: The "ADL staircase assessment" of dependence/independence, extended with a self-rating of difficulty, was administered at home visits. Data distribution in the 5 national samples and analyses with or without use of the self-rating data were carried out. RESULTS: High proportions of the subjects were independent in most of the activities assessed, while substantial proportions reported difficulties. Considerable differences were identified among the national samples. In personal activities of daily living, those assessed as independent varied from 87% to 100%, while the proportion of those who rated themselves as "independent without difficulty" ranged from 53% to 98%. In instrumental activities, 33-91% were assessed as independent, while the proportions of "independent without difficulty" ranged from 24% to 77%. Analysis results differed as to whether or not self-ratings of difficulty were used. CONCLUSION: The combined approach to data collection gave a diversified, information-rich picture. The assessment used is easy to administer and can be used in practice contexts in different countries. (Less)
Please use this url to cite or link to this publication:
https://lup.lub.lu.se/record/1302393
- author
- Iwarsson, Susanne LU ; Horstmann, Vibeke LU and Sonn, Ulla
- organization
- publishing date
- 2009
- type
- Contribution to journal
- publication status
- published
- subject
- in
- Journal of rehabilitation medicine : official journal of the UEMS European Board of Physical and Rehabilitation Medicine
- volume
- 41
- issue
- 3
- pages
- 150 - 156
- publisher
- Taylor & Francis
- external identifiers
-
- wos:000264017100007
- pmid:19229447
- scopus:60749123580
- pmid:19229447
- ISSN
- 1651-2081
- DOI
- 10.2340/16501977-0298
- project
- Home, Health and Disability along the Process of Ageing
- language
- English
- LU publication?
- yes
- additional info
- The information about affiliations in this record was updated in December 2015. The record was previously connected to the following departments: Division of Occupational Therapy (Closed 2012) (013025000)
- id
- bf6a0221-847d-413d-933c-10c41803adda (old id 1302393)
- alternative location
- http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/19229447?dopt=Abstract
- date added to LUP
- 2016-04-04 09:32:49
- date last changed
- 2022-01-29 18:21:48
@article{bf6a0221-847d-413d-933c-10c41803adda, abstract = {{OBJECTIVE: To study the information gained by extending a well-established instrument of dependence/independence in activities of daily living with a self-rating of difficulty, and to illustrate the relevance and usefulness of this combined approach with cross-national data. DESIGN AND SUBJECTS: Cross-sectional survey study data collected with 1918 very old persons in 5 European countries. METHODS: The "ADL staircase assessment" of dependence/independence, extended with a self-rating of difficulty, was administered at home visits. Data distribution in the 5 national samples and analyses with or without use of the self-rating data were carried out. RESULTS: High proportions of the subjects were independent in most of the activities assessed, while substantial proportions reported difficulties. Considerable differences were identified among the national samples. In personal activities of daily living, those assessed as independent varied from 87% to 100%, while the proportion of those who rated themselves as "independent without difficulty" ranged from 53% to 98%. In instrumental activities, 33-91% were assessed as independent, while the proportions of "independent without difficulty" ranged from 24% to 77%. Analysis results differed as to whether or not self-ratings of difficulty were used. CONCLUSION: The combined approach to data collection gave a diversified, information-rich picture. The assessment used is easy to administer and can be used in practice contexts in different countries.}}, author = {{Iwarsson, Susanne and Horstmann, Vibeke and Sonn, Ulla}}, issn = {{1651-2081}}, language = {{eng}}, number = {{3}}, pages = {{150--156}}, publisher = {{Taylor & Francis}}, series = {{Journal of rehabilitation medicine : official journal of the UEMS European Board of Physical and Rehabilitation Medicine}}, title = {{Assessment of dependence in daily activities combined with a self-rating of difficulty.}}, url = {{http://dx.doi.org/10.2340/16501977-0298}}, doi = {{10.2340/16501977-0298}}, volume = {{41}}, year = {{2009}}, }