Mobile vs. fixed meniscal bearing in total knee replacement A randomised radiostereometric study.
(2005) In Knee 12(6). p.414-418- Abstract
- 52 knees scheduled for a total knee arthroplasty were randomised to either a fixed or a mobile polyethylene bearing. The design was identical in all parts. The knee systems used were the Rotaglide Total Knee System (RTK) (R) and the Nuffield Total Knee System (NTK) (R), both from the same manufacturer (Corin Medical Ltd., UK). All knees implanted were uncemented. The patients were followed for 2 years clinically and with radiostereometric analyses to assess migration over time and inducible displacement of the tibial component. Separate analysis of the mobility of the tibial insert in the knees with a mobile bearing was also made. The migration measured with RSA between the I st and 2nd year expressed as maximum total point motion (MTPM)... (More)
- 52 knees scheduled for a total knee arthroplasty were randomised to either a fixed or a mobile polyethylene bearing. The design was identical in all parts. The knee systems used were the Rotaglide Total Knee System (RTK) (R) and the Nuffield Total Knee System (NTK) (R), both from the same manufacturer (Corin Medical Ltd., UK). All knees implanted were uncemented. The patients were followed for 2 years clinically and with radiostereometric analyses to assess migration over time and inducible displacement of the tibial component. Separate analysis of the mobility of the tibial insert in the knees with a mobile bearing was also made. The migration measured with RSA between the I st and 2nd year expressed as maximum total point motion (MTPM) might predict the risk of loosening of the implant. (Less)
Please use this url to cite or link to this publication:
https://lup.lub.lu.se/record/144035
- author
- Hansson, Ulrik LU ; Toksvig-Larsen, Sören LU ; Jorn, Lars Peter and Ryd, Leif LU
- organization
- publishing date
- 2005
- type
- Contribution to journal
- publication status
- published
- subject
- keywords
- inducible, uncemented, mobile bearing, knee, arthroplasty, displacement, fixation
- in
- Knee
- volume
- 12
- issue
- 6
- pages
- 414 - 418
- publisher
- Elsevier
- external identifiers
-
- wos:000233481000004
- pmid:16125941
- scopus:27744523609
- ISSN
- 1873-5800
- DOI
- 10.1016/j.knee.2004.12.002
- language
- English
- LU publication?
- yes
- id
- 79c7c3ae-0a5d-4419-8068-8cebe55b3868 (old id 144035)
- alternative location
- http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/query.fcgi?cmd=Retrieve&db=PubMed&list_uids=16125941&dopt=Abstract
- date added to LUP
- 2016-04-01 11:58:08
- date last changed
- 2022-01-26 20:55:01
@article{79c7c3ae-0a5d-4419-8068-8cebe55b3868,
abstract = {{52 knees scheduled for a total knee arthroplasty were randomised to either a fixed or a mobile polyethylene bearing. The design was identical in all parts. The knee systems used were the Rotaglide Total Knee System (RTK) (R) and the Nuffield Total Knee System (NTK) (R), both from the same manufacturer (Corin Medical Ltd., UK). All knees implanted were uncemented. The patients were followed for 2 years clinically and with radiostereometric analyses to assess migration over time and inducible displacement of the tibial component. Separate analysis of the mobility of the tibial insert in the knees with a mobile bearing was also made. The migration measured with RSA between the I st and 2nd year expressed as maximum total point motion (MTPM) might predict the risk of loosening of the implant.}},
author = {{Hansson, Ulrik and Toksvig-Larsen, Sören and Jorn, Lars Peter and Ryd, Leif}},
issn = {{1873-5800}},
keywords = {{inducible; uncemented; mobile bearing; knee; arthroplasty; displacement; fixation}},
language = {{eng}},
number = {{6}},
pages = {{414--418}},
publisher = {{Elsevier}},
series = {{Knee}},
title = {{Mobile vs. fixed meniscal bearing in total knee replacement A randomised radiostereometric study.}},
url = {{http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.knee.2004.12.002}},
doi = {{10.1016/j.knee.2004.12.002}},
volume = {{12}},
year = {{2005}},
}