Advanced

Mobile vs. fixed meniscal bearing in total knee replacement A randomised radiostereometric study.

Hansson, Ulrik LU ; Toksvig-Larsen, Sören LU ; Jorn, Lars Peter and Ryd, Leif LU (2005) In Knee 12(6). p.414-418
Abstract
52 knees scheduled for a total knee arthroplasty were randomised to either a fixed or a mobile polyethylene bearing. The design was identical in all parts. The knee systems used were the Rotaglide Total Knee System (RTK) (R) and the Nuffield Total Knee System (NTK) (R), both from the same manufacturer (Corin Medical Ltd., UK). All knees implanted were uncemented. The patients were followed for 2 years clinically and with radiostereometric analyses to assess migration over time and inducible displacement of the tibial component. Separate analysis of the mobility of the tibial insert in the knees with a mobile bearing was also made. The migration measured with RSA between the I st and 2nd year expressed as maximum total point motion (MTPM)... (More)
52 knees scheduled for a total knee arthroplasty were randomised to either a fixed or a mobile polyethylene bearing. The design was identical in all parts. The knee systems used were the Rotaglide Total Knee System (RTK) (R) and the Nuffield Total Knee System (NTK) (R), both from the same manufacturer (Corin Medical Ltd., UK). All knees implanted were uncemented. The patients were followed for 2 years clinically and with radiostereometric analyses to assess migration over time and inducible displacement of the tibial component. Separate analysis of the mobility of the tibial insert in the knees with a mobile bearing was also made. The migration measured with RSA between the I st and 2nd year expressed as maximum total point motion (MTPM) might predict the risk of loosening of the implant. (Less)
Please use this url to cite or link to this publication:
author
organization
publishing date
type
Contribution to journal
publication status
published
subject
keywords
inducible, uncemented, mobile bearing, knee, arthroplasty, displacement, fixation
in
Knee
volume
12
issue
6
pages
414 - 418
publisher
Elsevier
external identifiers
  • wos:000233481000004
  • pmid:16125941
  • scopus:27744523609
ISSN
1873-5800
DOI
10.1016/j.knee.2004.12.002
language
English
LU publication?
yes
id
79c7c3ae-0a5d-4419-8068-8cebe55b3868 (old id 144035)
alternative location
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/query.fcgi?cmd=Retrieve&db=PubMed&list_uids=16125941&dopt=Abstract
date added to LUP
2007-07-12 11:37:04
date last changed
2017-11-19 03:30:49
@article{79c7c3ae-0a5d-4419-8068-8cebe55b3868,
  abstract     = {52 knees scheduled for a total knee arthroplasty were randomised to either a fixed or a mobile polyethylene bearing. The design was identical in all parts. The knee systems used were the Rotaglide Total Knee System (RTK) (R) and the Nuffield Total Knee System (NTK) (R), both from the same manufacturer (Corin Medical Ltd., UK). All knees implanted were uncemented. The patients were followed for 2 years clinically and with radiostereometric analyses to assess migration over time and inducible displacement of the tibial component. Separate analysis of the mobility of the tibial insert in the knees with a mobile bearing was also made. The migration measured with RSA between the I st and 2nd year expressed as maximum total point motion (MTPM) might predict the risk of loosening of the implant.},
  author       = {Hansson, Ulrik and Toksvig-Larsen, Sören and Jorn, Lars Peter and Ryd, Leif},
  issn         = {1873-5800},
  keyword      = {inducible,uncemented,mobile bearing,knee,arthroplasty,displacement,fixation},
  language     = {eng},
  number       = {6},
  pages        = {414--418},
  publisher    = {Elsevier},
  series       = {Knee},
  title        = {Mobile vs. fixed meniscal bearing in total knee replacement A randomised radiostereometric study.},
  url          = {http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.knee.2004.12.002},
  volume       = {12},
  year         = {2005},
}