Advanced

House sparrows (Passer domesticus) adjust their social status position to their physiological costs

Lindstrom, K M; Hasselquist, Dennis LU and Wikelski, M (2005) In Hormones and Behavior 48(3). p.311-320
Abstract
For group-living animals, the maintenance of a position in the social hierarchy may be associated with physiological costs such as increased stress and energy expenditure or suppressed immune functions. In this study, we experimentally manipulated the social status of house sparrows so that each bird experienced two social environments in random sequence: being dominant and subordinate. For 14 males, we investigated how corticosterone concentrations, energy expenditure and immune functions were affected by these changes in social status position. We found that the cost of maintaining a social status position differed between individuals and were related to individual body size. Birds with small body size had increased costs in terns of... (More)
For group-living animals, the maintenance of a position in the social hierarchy may be associated with physiological costs such as increased stress and energy expenditure or suppressed immune functions. In this study, we experimentally manipulated the social status of house sparrows so that each bird experienced two social environments in random sequence: being dominant and subordinate. For 14 males, we investigated how corticosterone concentrations, energy expenditure and immune functions were affected by these changes in social status position. We found that the cost of maintaining a social status position differed between individuals and were related to individual body size. Birds with small body size had increased costs in terns of increased stress responses and reduced cell-mediated immune responses while being experimentally kept as dominants, while birds with large body size had increased costs while they were subordinates. We also found that birds with increased energetic and immunological costs as dominants obtained a low status position in the large group, while birds with increased costs as subordinates obtained a high status position in the large group. In summary, we found that the costs associated with the maintenance of social status position differed between individuals and was related to the individuals' body size. Furthermore, in a large group, individuals maintained a social status position that minimized energetic and immunological costs. (c) 2005 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved. (Less)
Please use this url to cite or link to this publication:
author
organization
publishing date
type
Contribution to journal
publication status
published
subject
in
Hormones and Behavior
volume
48
issue
3
pages
311 - 320
publisher
Elsevier
external identifiers
  • wos:000231629500009
  • pmid:15896793
  • scopus:23844492563
ISSN
1095-6867
DOI
10.1016/j.yhbeh.2005.04.002
language
English
LU publication?
yes
id
591013b5-5ed5-496d-ac5f-9a38b44affee (old id 145318)
date added to LUP
2007-06-25 14:53:06
date last changed
2017-08-06 03:33:48
@article{591013b5-5ed5-496d-ac5f-9a38b44affee,
  abstract     = {For group-living animals, the maintenance of a position in the social hierarchy may be associated with physiological costs such as increased stress and energy expenditure or suppressed immune functions. In this study, we experimentally manipulated the social status of house sparrows so that each bird experienced two social environments in random sequence: being dominant and subordinate. For 14 males, we investigated how corticosterone concentrations, energy expenditure and immune functions were affected by these changes in social status position. We found that the cost of maintaining a social status position differed between individuals and were related to individual body size. Birds with small body size had increased costs in terns of increased stress responses and reduced cell-mediated immune responses while being experimentally kept as dominants, while birds with large body size had increased costs while they were subordinates. We also found that birds with increased energetic and immunological costs as dominants obtained a low status position in the large group, while birds with increased costs as subordinates obtained a high status position in the large group. In summary, we found that the costs associated with the maintenance of social status position differed between individuals and was related to the individuals' body size. Furthermore, in a large group, individuals maintained a social status position that minimized energetic and immunological costs. (c) 2005 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.},
  author       = {Lindstrom, K M and Hasselquist, Dennis and Wikelski, M},
  issn         = {1095-6867},
  language     = {eng},
  number       = {3},
  pages        = {311--320},
  publisher    = {Elsevier},
  series       = {Hormones and Behavior},
  title        = {House sparrows (Passer domesticus) adjust their social status position to their physiological costs},
  url          = {http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.yhbeh.2005.04.002},
  volume       = {48},
  year         = {2005},
}