Advanced

Reference-based search strategies in systematic reviews

Runeson, Per LU and Skoglund, Mats LU (2009) EASE 2009: Evaluation and Assessment in Software Engineering, 2009 In [Host publication title missing]
Abstract
In systematic reviews, the number of articles found by search strings tend to be very large. In order to limit the number of articles to handle manually, we investigate a search strategy based on references between papers. We first identify a “take-off paper” which is the starting point for the search and then we follow the references from that paper. We also investigate “cardinal papers”, i.e. papers that are referenced by many authors, and let the references to those papers guide the selection in the systematic review. We evaluate the search strategies on three published systematic reviews. The results vary greatly between the three studied systematic reviews, from 88% reduction to 92% extension of the original paper set.
Please use this url to cite or link to this publication:
author
organization
publishing date
type
Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceeding
publication status
published
subject
in
[Host publication title missing]
editor
Budgen, David and
publisher
British Computer Society
conference name
EASE 2009: Evaluation and Assessment in Software Engineering, 2009
language
English
LU publication?
yes
id
ee1aa6d2-ce28-4245-a1f9-52dd636d1d83 (old id 1467075)
date added to LUP
2009-08-31 13:52:11
date last changed
2016-04-16 08:43:40
@inproceedings{ee1aa6d2-ce28-4245-a1f9-52dd636d1d83,
  abstract     = {In systematic reviews, the number of articles found by search strings tend to be very large. In order to limit the number of articles to handle manually, we investigate a search strategy based on references between papers. We first identify a “take-off paper” which is the starting point for the search and then we follow the references from that paper. We also investigate “cardinal papers”, i.e. papers that are referenced by many authors, and let the references to those papers guide the selection in the systematic review. We evaluate the search strategies on three published systematic reviews. The results vary greatly between the three studied systematic reviews, from 88% reduction to 92% extension of the original paper set.},
  author       = {Runeson, Per and Skoglund, Mats},
  booktitle    = {[Host publication title missing]},
  editor       = {Budgen, David},
  language     = {eng},
  publisher    = {British Computer Society},
  title        = {Reference-based search strategies in systematic reviews},
  year         = {2009},
}