Advanced

Treating Kuhn’s Gap with Critical Contextualism. Review of William Rehg (2009). Cogent Science in Context. The Science Wars, Argumentation Theory and Habermas, Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.

Zenker, Frank LU (2009) In Cogency - Journal of Reasoning and Argumentation 1(1). p.149-182
Please use this url to cite or link to this publication:
author
organization
publishing date
type
Contribution to journal
publication status
published
subject
in
Cogency - Journal of Reasoning and Argumentation
volume
1
issue
1
pages
149 - 182
publisher
Department of Psychology, Lund University
ISSN
0718-8285
language
English
LU publication?
yes
id
acab2a92-1044-4b2c-a0db-7e245658d1da (old id 1494742)
date added to LUP
2009-10-22 09:09:32
date last changed
2016-09-30 05:47:46
@article{acab2a92-1044-4b2c-a0db-7e245658d1da,
  author       = {Zenker, Frank},
  issn         = {0718-8285},
  language     = {eng},
  number       = {1},
  pages        = {149--182},
  publisher    = {Department of Psychology, Lund University},
  series       = {Cogency - Journal of Reasoning and Argumentation},
  title        = {Treating Kuhn’s Gap with Critical Contextualism. Review of William Rehg (2009). Cogent Science in Context. The Science Wars, Argumentation Theory and Habermas, Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.},
  volume       = {1},
  year         = {2009},
}