A philosophical view on concepts in psychiatry
(2010) In International Journal of Law and Psychiatry 33(2). p.66-72- Abstract
- This essay first outlines a philosophical theory of concepts and then applies it to two areas of relevance to psychiatrists, especially forensic psychiatrists. In the philosophical theory, the respective roles of verbal and non-verbal definitions are illuminated, and the importance of the phenomenon of division of semantic labour is stressed. It is pointed out that vagueness and ambiguity of a term often result when the term is used for several practical purposes at the same time. Such multi-purpose uses of terms may explain both the current problems associated with the Swedish forensic-psychiatric concept of a severe mental disorder and some of the shortcomings of DSM-IV. (C) 2009 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
Please use this url to cite or link to this publication:
https://lup.lub.lu.se/record/1587037
- author
- Malmgren, Helge ; Radovic, Susanna ; Thorén, Henrik LU and Haglund, Bjorn
- organization
- publishing date
- 2010
- type
- Contribution to journal
- publication status
- published
- subject
- keywords
- Operational definitions, psychiatry, Forensic, Diagnostic criteria, Concepts, Conceptual analysis, Severe mental disorder
- in
- International Journal of Law and Psychiatry
- volume
- 33
- issue
- 2
- pages
- 66 - 72
- publisher
- Elsevier
- external identifiers
-
- wos:000276128500002
- scopus:76949094775
- pmid:20061028
- ISSN
- 0160-2527
- DOI
- 10.1016/j.ijlp.2009.12.006
- language
- English
- LU publication?
- yes
- id
- 50075bfb-28e7-42ec-aef8-491644cf337c (old id 1587037)
- date added to LUP
- 2016-04-01 11:06:30
- date last changed
- 2022-04-05 00:11:07
@article{50075bfb-28e7-42ec-aef8-491644cf337c, abstract = {{This essay first outlines a philosophical theory of concepts and then applies it to two areas of relevance to psychiatrists, especially forensic psychiatrists. In the philosophical theory, the respective roles of verbal and non-verbal definitions are illuminated, and the importance of the phenomenon of division of semantic labour is stressed. It is pointed out that vagueness and ambiguity of a term often result when the term is used for several practical purposes at the same time. Such multi-purpose uses of terms may explain both the current problems associated with the Swedish forensic-psychiatric concept of a severe mental disorder and some of the shortcomings of DSM-IV. (C) 2009 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.}}, author = {{Malmgren, Helge and Radovic, Susanna and Thorén, Henrik and Haglund, Bjorn}}, issn = {{0160-2527}}, keywords = {{Operational definitions; psychiatry; Forensic; Diagnostic criteria; Concepts; Conceptual analysis; Severe mental disorder}}, language = {{eng}}, number = {{2}}, pages = {{66--72}}, publisher = {{Elsevier}}, series = {{International Journal of Law and Psychiatry}}, title = {{A philosophical view on concepts in psychiatry}}, url = {{http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ijlp.2009.12.006}}, doi = {{10.1016/j.ijlp.2009.12.006}}, volume = {{33}}, year = {{2010}}, }