Skip to main content

Lund University Publications

LUND UNIVERSITY LIBRARIES

How Thomas Bartholin the Younger Read His Rudbeck : A Forgotten Debate on Historical Method in Seventeenth-century Scandinavia

Norris, Matthew LU (2025) In Erudition and the Republic of Letters 10(1). p.1-24
Abstract
In 1689 the Danish royal antiquary Thomas Bartholin the Younger (1659–1690) published a celebrated antiquarian work on the attitudes, customs, and rituals of the pagan inhabitants of Scandinavia. It has been deemed significant both for influencing the development of the historical conception of the ‘Viking Age’ in the eighteenth and nineteenth centuries, and for introducing a rigorous source-critical methodology to Scandinavian historiography, inspired by the French Benedictine scholar Jean Mabillon, and foreshadowing the scientific history of the coming centuries. Yet modern assessments of the work have rarely questioned the consistency with which Bartholin applied his principles to solve historical problems, and have never made note of... (More)
In 1689 the Danish royal antiquary Thomas Bartholin the Younger (1659–1690) published a celebrated antiquarian work on the attitudes, customs, and rituals of the pagan inhabitants of Scandinavia. It has been deemed significant both for influencing the development of the historical conception of the ‘Viking Age’ in the eighteenth and nineteenth centuries, and for introducing a rigorous source-critical methodology to Scandinavian historiography, inspired by the French Benedictine scholar Jean Mabillon, and foreshadowing the scientific history of the coming centuries. Yet modern assessments of the work have rarely questioned the consistency with which Bartholin applied his principles to solve historical problems, and have never made note of the fact that he framed his methodological reform as a bitter critique of contemporary Swedish scholarship. Exploring the overlooked debate generated by Bartholin’s book, this article shows that it accentuated an internal friction in late seventeenth-century historiography between opposing views concerning historical evidence. (Less)
Please use this url to cite or link to this publication:
author
organization
publishing date
type
Contribution to journal
publication status
published
subject
in
Erudition and the Republic of Letters
volume
10
issue
1
pages
24 pages
publisher
Brill
external identifiers
  • scopus:105002322070
ISSN
2405-5069
DOI
10.1163/24055069-10010001
language
English
LU publication?
yes
id
159f730c-09ae-4c2c-9dbd-060eff5e54d1
date added to LUP
2024-04-22 14:53:46
date last changed
2025-07-15 04:01:58
@article{159f730c-09ae-4c2c-9dbd-060eff5e54d1,
  abstract     = {{In 1689 the Danish royal antiquary Thomas Bartholin the Younger (1659–1690) published a celebrated antiquarian work on the attitudes, customs, and rituals of the pagan inhabitants of Scandinavia. It has been deemed significant both for influencing the development of the historical conception of the ‘Viking Age’ in the eighteenth and nineteenth centuries, and for introducing a rigorous source-critical methodology to Scandinavian historiography, inspired by the French Benedictine scholar Jean Mabillon, and foreshadowing the scientific history of the coming centuries. Yet modern assessments of the work have rarely questioned the consistency with which Bartholin applied his principles to solve historical problems, and have never made note of the fact that he framed his methodological reform as a bitter critique of contemporary Swedish scholarship. Exploring the overlooked debate generated by Bartholin’s book, this article shows that it accentuated an internal friction in late seventeenth-century historiography between opposing views concerning historical evidence.}},
  author       = {{Norris, Matthew}},
  issn         = {{2405-5069}},
  language     = {{eng}},
  number       = {{1}},
  pages        = {{1--24}},
  publisher    = {{Brill}},
  series       = {{Erudition and the Republic of Letters}},
  title        = {{How Thomas Bartholin the Younger Read His Rudbeck : A Forgotten Debate on Historical Method in Seventeenth-century Scandinavia}},
  url          = {{http://dx.doi.org/10.1163/24055069-10010001}},
  doi          = {{10.1163/24055069-10010001}},
  volume       = {{10}},
  year         = {{2025}},
}