Skip to main content

Lund University Publications

LUND UNIVERSITY LIBRARIES

Coherence and Reliability: The Case of Overlapping Testimonies

Schubert, Stefan LU (2011) In Erkenntnis 74(2). p.263-275
Abstract
Abstract in Undetermined
A measure of coherence is said to be reliability conducive if and only if a higher degree of coherence (as measured) among testimonies implies a higher probability that the witnesses are reliable. Recently, it has been proved that several coherence measures proposed in the literature are reliability conducive in scenarios of equivalent testimonies (Olsson and Schubert 2007; Schubert, to appear). My aim is to investigate which coherence measures turn out to be reliability conducive in the more general scenario where the testimonies do not have to be equivalent. It is shown that four measures are reliability conducive in the present scenario, all of which are ordinally equivalent to the Shogenji measure. I take... (More)
Abstract in Undetermined
A measure of coherence is said to be reliability conducive if and only if a higher degree of coherence (as measured) among testimonies implies a higher probability that the witnesses are reliable. Recently, it has been proved that several coherence measures proposed in the literature are reliability conducive in scenarios of equivalent testimonies (Olsson and Schubert 2007; Schubert, to appear). My aim is to investigate which coherence measures turn out to be reliability conducive in the more general scenario where the testimonies do not have to be equivalent. It is shown that four measures are reliability conducive in the present scenario, all of which are ordinally equivalent to the Shogenji measure. I take that to be an argument for the Shogenji measure being a fruitful explication of coherence. (Less)
Please use this url to cite or link to this publication:
author
organization
publishing date
type
Contribution to journal
publication status
published
subject
in
Erkenntnis
volume
74
issue
2
pages
263 - 275
publisher
Springer
external identifiers
  • wos:000286830900006
  • scopus:79551560182
ISSN
1572-8420
DOI
10.1007/s10670-010-9246-y
language
English
LU publication?
yes
id
1851accc-f178-48b2-9779-e529587accf1 (old id 1642365)
date added to LUP
2016-04-01 10:48:12
date last changed
2021-10-06 01:13:23
@article{1851accc-f178-48b2-9779-e529587accf1,
  abstract     = {Abstract in Undetermined<br/>A measure of coherence is said to be reliability conducive if and only if a higher degree of coherence (as measured) among testimonies implies a higher probability that the witnesses are reliable. Recently, it has been proved that several coherence measures proposed in the literature are reliability conducive in scenarios of equivalent testimonies (Olsson and Schubert 2007; Schubert, to appear). My aim is to investigate which coherence measures turn out to be reliability conducive in the more general scenario where the testimonies do not have to be equivalent. It is shown that four measures are reliability conducive in the present scenario, all of which are ordinally equivalent to the Shogenji measure. I take that to be an argument for the Shogenji measure being a fruitful explication of coherence.},
  author       = {Schubert, Stefan},
  issn         = {1572-8420},
  language     = {eng},
  number       = {2},
  pages        = {263--275},
  publisher    = {Springer},
  series       = {Erkenntnis},
  title        = {Coherence and Reliability: The Case of Overlapping Testimonies},
  url          = {http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10670-010-9246-y},
  doi          = {10.1007/s10670-010-9246-y},
  volume       = {74},
  year         = {2011},
}