Assessing the consistency of shedder status under various experimental conditions
(2024) In Forensic Science International: Genetics 69.- Abstract
Shedder status is defined as the propensity of an individual to leave DNA behind on touched items or surfaces and has been suggested as one of the major factors influencing DNA transfer. However, little is known about whether shedder status is a constant property of an individual across multiple measurements or when the environmental conditions are changed. We have assessed DNA depositions of six males on 20 occasions to acquire a reference data set and to classify the participants into high, intermediate, or low shedders. This data set was also used to investigate how the probability of a correct shedder status classification changed when the number of DNA deposition measurements increased. Individual sweat rates were measured with a... (More)
Shedder status is defined as the propensity of an individual to leave DNA behind on touched items or surfaces and has been suggested as one of the major factors influencing DNA transfer. However, little is known about whether shedder status is a constant property of an individual across multiple measurements or when the environmental conditions are changed. We have assessed DNA depositions of six males on 20 occasions to acquire a reference data set and to classify the participants into high, intermediate, or low shedders. This data set was also used to investigate how the probability of a correct shedder status classification changed when the number of DNA deposition measurements increased. Individual sweat rates were measured with a VapoMeter and data regarding hygiene routines were collected through a questionnaire on each sampling occasion. Next, we investigated how changes in the experimental conditions such as seasonal variation, hygiene routines, the temperature of the touched object, and repeated handling of an object influenced the DNA shedding. Additionally, we assessed DNA collected from the face and from T-shirts worn by the six participants to explore whether shedder status may be associated with the relative amount of DNA obtained from other body parts. Our results indicate that shedder status is a stable property across different seasons and different temperatures of handled objects. The relative DNA amounts obtained from repeatedly handled tubes, worn T-shirts, and from faces reflected the shedder status of the participants. We suggest that an individual's shedder status is highly influenced by the DNA levels on other body parts than hands, accumulating on the palms by frequently touching e.g., the face or previously handled items harboring self-DNA. Assessing physiological differences between the participants revealed that there were no associations between DNA shedding and individual sweat rates.
(Less)
- author
- Jansson, Linda LU ; Siti, Chiara LU ; Hedell, Ronny ; Forsberg, Christina ; Ansell, Ricky and Hedman, Johannes LU
- organization
- publishing date
- 2024-03
- type
- Contribution to journal
- publication status
- published
- subject
- keywords
- DNA deposition, DNA transfer, Forensic DNA Analysis, Shedder classification, Shedder status, Sweat
- in
- Forensic Science International: Genetics
- volume
- 69
- article number
- 103002
- publisher
- Elsevier
- external identifiers
-
- pmid:38176092
- scopus:85182409356
- ISSN
- 1872-4973
- DOI
- 10.1016/j.fsigen.2023.103002
- language
- English
- LU publication?
- yes
- id
- 16653c54-a1b9-46b2-a559-6e9fd079d7ad
- date added to LUP
- 2024-02-22 10:41:38
- date last changed
- 2024-04-23 16:12:42
@article{16653c54-a1b9-46b2-a559-6e9fd079d7ad,
abstract = {{<p>Shedder status is defined as the propensity of an individual to leave DNA behind on touched items or surfaces and has been suggested as one of the major factors influencing DNA transfer. However, little is known about whether shedder status is a constant property of an individual across multiple measurements or when the environmental conditions are changed. We have assessed DNA depositions of six males on 20 occasions to acquire a reference data set and to classify the participants into high, intermediate, or low shedders. This data set was also used to investigate how the probability of a correct shedder status classification changed when the number of DNA deposition measurements increased. Individual sweat rates were measured with a VapoMeter and data regarding hygiene routines were collected through a questionnaire on each sampling occasion. Next, we investigated how changes in the experimental conditions such as seasonal variation, hygiene routines, the temperature of the touched object, and repeated handling of an object influenced the DNA shedding. Additionally, we assessed DNA collected from the face and from T-shirts worn by the six participants to explore whether shedder status may be associated with the relative amount of DNA obtained from other body parts. Our results indicate that shedder status is a stable property across different seasons and different temperatures of handled objects. The relative DNA amounts obtained from repeatedly handled tubes, worn T-shirts, and from faces reflected the shedder status of the participants. We suggest that an individual's shedder status is highly influenced by the DNA levels on other body parts than hands, accumulating on the palms by frequently touching e.g., the face or previously handled items harboring self-DNA. Assessing physiological differences between the participants revealed that there were no associations between DNA shedding and individual sweat rates.</p>}},
author = {{Jansson, Linda and Siti, Chiara and Hedell, Ronny and Forsberg, Christina and Ansell, Ricky and Hedman, Johannes}},
issn = {{1872-4973}},
keywords = {{DNA deposition; DNA transfer; Forensic DNA Analysis; Shedder classification; Shedder status; Sweat}},
language = {{eng}},
publisher = {{Elsevier}},
series = {{Forensic Science International: Genetics}},
title = {{Assessing the consistency of shedder status under various experimental conditions}},
url = {{http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.fsigen.2023.103002}},
doi = {{10.1016/j.fsigen.2023.103002}},
volume = {{69}},
year = {{2024}},
}