Skip to main content

Lund University Publications

LUND UNIVERSITY LIBRARIES

A CONCEPTUAL FRAMEWORK FOR MANAGING RADIATION DOSE TO PATIENTS IN DIAGNOSTIC RADIOLOGY USING REFERENCE DOSE LEVELS

Almén, Anja LU and Båth, Magnus (2016) In Radiation Protection Dosimetry 169(1-4). p.17-23
Abstract

The overall aim of the present work was to develop a conceptual framework for managing radiation dose in diagnostic radiology with the intention to support optimisation. An optimisation process was first derived. The framework for managing radiation dose, based on the derived optimisation process, was then outlined. The outset of the optimisation process is four stages: providing equipment, establishing methodology, performing examinations and ensuring quality. The optimisation process comprises a series of activities and actions at these stages. The current system of diagnostic reference levels is an activity in the last stage, ensuring quality. The system becomes a reactive activity only to a certain extent engaging the core activity... (More)

The overall aim of the present work was to develop a conceptual framework for managing radiation dose in diagnostic radiology with the intention to support optimisation. An optimisation process was first derived. The framework for managing radiation dose, based on the derived optimisation process, was then outlined. The outset of the optimisation process is four stages: providing equipment, establishing methodology, performing examinations and ensuring quality. The optimisation process comprises a series of activities and actions at these stages. The current system of diagnostic reference levels is an activity in the last stage, ensuring quality. The system becomes a reactive activity only to a certain extent engaging the core activity in the radiology department, performing examinations. Three reference dose levels-possible, expected and established-were assigned to the three stages in the optimisation process, excluding ensuring quality. A reasonably achievable dose range is also derived, indicating an acceptable deviation from the established dose level. A reasonable radiation dose for a single patient is within this range. The suggested framework for managing radiation dose should be regarded as one part of the optimisation process. The optimisation process constitutes a variety of complementary activities, where managing radiation dose is only one part. This emphasises the need to take a holistic approach integrating the optimisation process in different clinical activities.

(Less)
Please use this url to cite or link to this publication:
author
and
publishing date
type
Contribution to journal
publication status
published
subject
keywords
Algorithms, Internationality, Models, Organizational, Practice Guidelines as Topic, Radiation Exposure/analysis, Radiation Monitoring/standards, Radiation Protection/standards, Radiography/standards, Radiology/organization & administration, Reference Values
in
Radiation Protection Dosimetry
volume
169
issue
1-4
pages
7 pages
publisher
Oxford University Press
external identifiers
  • scopus:84978943510
  • pmid:26705356
ISSN
1742-3406
DOI
10.1093/rpd/ncv512
language
English
LU publication?
no
id
1aa113ee-bd80-4194-a7aa-7c317bb7dfd6
date added to LUP
2018-06-16 21:15:10
date last changed
2024-03-01 21:00:55
@article{1aa113ee-bd80-4194-a7aa-7c317bb7dfd6,
  abstract     = {{<p>The overall aim of the present work was to develop a conceptual framework for managing radiation dose in diagnostic radiology with the intention to support optimisation. An optimisation process was first derived. The framework for managing radiation dose, based on the derived optimisation process, was then outlined. The outset of the optimisation process is four stages: providing equipment, establishing methodology, performing examinations and ensuring quality. The optimisation process comprises a series of activities and actions at these stages. The current system of diagnostic reference levels is an activity in the last stage, ensuring quality. The system becomes a reactive activity only to a certain extent engaging the core activity in the radiology department, performing examinations. Three reference dose levels-possible, expected and established-were assigned to the three stages in the optimisation process, excluding ensuring quality. A reasonably achievable dose range is also derived, indicating an acceptable deviation from the established dose level. A reasonable radiation dose for a single patient is within this range. The suggested framework for managing radiation dose should be regarded as one part of the optimisation process. The optimisation process constitutes a variety of complementary activities, where managing radiation dose is only one part. This emphasises the need to take a holistic approach integrating the optimisation process in different clinical activities. </p>}},
  author       = {{Almén, Anja and Båth, Magnus}},
  issn         = {{1742-3406}},
  keywords     = {{Algorithms; Internationality; Models, Organizational; Practice Guidelines as Topic; Radiation Exposure/analysis; Radiation Monitoring/standards; Radiation Protection/standards; Radiography/standards; Radiology/organization & administration; Reference Values}},
  language     = {{eng}},
  number       = {{1-4}},
  pages        = {{17--23}},
  publisher    = {{Oxford University Press}},
  series       = {{Radiation Protection Dosimetry}},
  title        = {{A CONCEPTUAL FRAMEWORK FOR MANAGING RADIATION DOSE TO PATIENTS IN DIAGNOSTIC RADIOLOGY USING REFERENCE DOSE LEVELS}},
  url          = {{http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/rpd/ncv512}},
  doi          = {{10.1093/rpd/ncv512}},
  volume       = {{169}},
  year         = {{2016}},
}