Variation in models for simple dynamic structure–soil–structure interaction problems
(2017) 10th International Conference on Structural Dynamics, EURODYN 2017 In Procedia Engineering 199. p.2306-2311- Abstract
- To account for dynamic cross-coupling of structures via the soil, a computational model must be accurate enough to provide the correct overall behaviour of the scattered wave field. However, simplicity is also important when a model should be used for design purposes, especially in the early design stages and feasibility studies. The paper addresses the accuracy of simple models in which an array of structures is simplified into blocks placed on the ground surface or embedded within the soil. Comparisons are made between models that account or do not account, in a proper manner, for the inertia and embedment of the structures. Especially, the limitations of simplified models are discussed regarding their capability to quantify the... (More)
- To account for dynamic cross-coupling of structures via the soil, a computational model must be accurate enough to provide the correct overall behaviour of the scattered wave field. However, simplicity is also important when a model should be used for design purposes, especially in the early design stages and feasibility studies. The paper addresses the accuracy of simple models in which an array of structures is simplified into blocks placed on the ground surface or embedded within the soil. Comparisons are made between models that account or do not account, in a proper manner, for the inertia and embedment of the structures. Especially, the limitations of simplified models are discussed regarding their capability to quantify the insertion loss accurately. (Less)
Please use this url to cite or link to this publication:
https://lup.lub.lu.se/record/1b2e9c85-1882-4d95-bdce-88037a1e0f8b
- author
- Andersen, Lars Vabbersgaard
; Peplow, Andrew
LU
; Bucinskas, Paulius ; Persson, Peter LU and Persson, K. LU
- organization
- publishing date
- 2017-09-01
- type
- Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceeding
- publication status
- published
- subject
- keywords
- Ground vibration, insertion loss, SSI, Green’s function, embedded structures
- host publication
- Procedia Engineering
- series title
- Procedia Engineering
- volume
- 199
- pages
- 2306 - 2311
- conference name
- 10th International Conference on Structural Dynamics, EURODYN 2017
- conference location
- Rome, Italy
- conference dates
- 2017-09-10 - 2017-09-13
- external identifiers
-
- scopus:85029910726
- ISSN
- 1877-7058
- DOI
- 10.1016/j.proeng.2017.09.190
- language
- English
- LU publication?
- yes
- id
- 1b2e9c85-1882-4d95-bdce-88037a1e0f8b
- date added to LUP
- 2017-09-28 17:08:55
- date last changed
- 2022-04-25 02:58:56
@inproceedings{1b2e9c85-1882-4d95-bdce-88037a1e0f8b, abstract = {{To account for dynamic cross-coupling of structures via the soil, a computational model must be accurate enough to provide the correct overall behaviour of the scattered wave field. However, simplicity is also important when a model should be used for design purposes, especially in the early design stages and feasibility studies. The paper addresses the accuracy of simple models in which an array of structures is simplified into blocks placed on the ground surface or embedded within the soil. Comparisons are made between models that account or do not account, in a proper manner, for the inertia and embedment of the structures. Especially, the limitations of simplified models are discussed regarding their capability to quantify the insertion loss accurately.}}, author = {{Andersen, Lars Vabbersgaard and Peplow, Andrew and Bucinskas, Paulius and Persson, Peter and Persson, K.}}, booktitle = {{Procedia Engineering}}, issn = {{1877-7058}}, keywords = {{Ground vibration; insertion loss; SSI; Green’s function; embedded structures}}, language = {{eng}}, month = {{09}}, pages = {{2306--2311}}, series = {{Procedia Engineering}}, title = {{Variation in models for simple dynamic structure–soil–structure interaction problems}}, url = {{http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.proeng.2017.09.190}}, doi = {{10.1016/j.proeng.2017.09.190}}, volume = {{199}}, year = {{2017}}, }