Averaging bias in environmental impact estimates : Evidence from the negative footprint illusion
(2018) In Journal of Environmental Psychology 55. p.48-52- Abstract
In this paper we argue that unsustainable behaviors often stem from a common averaging bias when people estimate the environmental impact of a set of environmentally friendly and less friendly objects or actions. In Experiment 1, we show that people believe that the total carbon footprint of a category of items (a community of buildings in this case) is lower, rather than higher, when environmentally friendly (“green” buildings) items are added to the category, a negative footprint illusion. Experiment 2 showed that the carbon footprint estimate assigned to a category with a mix of environmentally friendly and less friendly objects (“green” and conventional buildings) is the average of its subsets (the “green” buildings and the... (More)
In this paper we argue that unsustainable behaviors often stem from a common averaging bias when people estimate the environmental impact of a set of environmentally friendly and less friendly objects or actions. In Experiment 1, we show that people believe that the total carbon footprint of a category of items (a community of buildings in this case) is lower, rather than higher, when environmentally friendly (“green” buildings) items are added to the category, a negative footprint illusion. Experiment 2 showed that the carbon footprint estimate assigned to a category with a mix of environmentally friendly and less friendly objects (“green” and conventional buildings) is the average of its subsets (the “green” buildings and the conventional buildings, respectively), an averaging bias. A similar averaging process may underpin estimates of the environmental impact of people's own actions, explaining why people believe that environmentally friendly actions can compensate for less friendly actions.
(Less)
- author
- Holmgren, Mattias ; Andersson, Hanna LU and Sörqvist, Patrik
- publishing date
- 2018-02
- type
- Contribution to journal
- publication status
- published
- subject
- keywords
- Averaging bias, Carbon footprint, The negative footprint illusion, “Green” buildings
- in
- Journal of Environmental Psychology
- volume
- 55
- pages
- 5 pages
- publisher
- Elsevier
- external identifiers
-
- scopus:85038968856
- ISSN
- 0272-4944
- DOI
- 10.1016/j.jenvp.2017.12.005
- language
- English
- LU publication?
- no
- additional info
- Publisher Copyright: © 2017 The Authors
- id
- 1b51e3d3-100b-4978-b00b-8a85835a363a
- date added to LUP
- 2023-12-05 17:13:33
- date last changed
- 2023-12-07 11:29:03
@article{1b51e3d3-100b-4978-b00b-8a85835a363a, abstract = {{<p>In this paper we argue that unsustainable behaviors often stem from a common averaging bias when people estimate the environmental impact of a set of environmentally friendly and less friendly objects or actions. In Experiment 1, we show that people believe that the total carbon footprint of a category of items (a community of buildings in this case) is lower, rather than higher, when environmentally friendly (“green” buildings) items are added to the category, a negative footprint illusion. Experiment 2 showed that the carbon footprint estimate assigned to a category with a mix of environmentally friendly and less friendly objects (“green” and conventional buildings) is the average of its subsets (the “green” buildings and the conventional buildings, respectively), an averaging bias. A similar averaging process may underpin estimates of the environmental impact of people's own actions, explaining why people believe that environmentally friendly actions can compensate for less friendly actions.</p>}}, author = {{Holmgren, Mattias and Andersson, Hanna and Sörqvist, Patrik}}, issn = {{0272-4944}}, keywords = {{Averaging bias; Carbon footprint; The negative footprint illusion; “Green” buildings}}, language = {{eng}}, pages = {{48--52}}, publisher = {{Elsevier}}, series = {{Journal of Environmental Psychology}}, title = {{Averaging bias in environmental impact estimates : Evidence from the negative footprint illusion}}, url = {{http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvp.2017.12.005}}, doi = {{10.1016/j.jenvp.2017.12.005}}, volume = {{55}}, year = {{2018}}, }