Underneath the peace: Shaolin monks’ views on the relationship between Buddhism and science
Lu, Yulin LU
and Joosse, Paul
(2024)
In Religion
55(1).
p.222-242
- Abstract
- This study explores Buddhist monks’ views on the religion-science relationship in contemporary China. Drawing on survey data, interviews with monks, and participant observation within Shaolin Temple – famous for its antiquity and its export of Shaolin Kungfu – we discern and theoretically account for two forms of ‘non-conflict,’ between science and religion, that shape monks’ mental lives. One group holds an ‘independent non-conflict’ perspective, which sees religion and science being at peace chiefly because they are seen as being wholly non-interactive with of one another. Another group holds to ‘collaborative non-conflict’ perspective, which sees religion and science as existing in a mutually corroborative relationship because they... (More)
- This study explores Buddhist monks’ views on the religion-science relationship in contemporary China. Drawing on survey data, interviews with monks, and participant observation within Shaolin Temple – famous for its antiquity and its export of Shaolin Kungfu – we discern and theoretically account for two forms of ‘non-conflict,’ between science and religion, that shape monks’ mental lives. One group holds an ‘independent non-conflict’ perspective, which sees religion and science being at peace chiefly because they are seen as being wholly non-interactive with of one another. Another group holds to ‘collaborative non-conflict’ perspective, which sees religion and science as existing in a mutually corroborative relationship because they tread on the same epistemic and sociocultural territory. Despite this bivalent amiability, we nevertheless encounter three tensions – relating to enchantment/disenchantment, epistemic authority, and technologically-induced secularization – that persist ‘underneath the peace’ between science and religion at Shaolin Temple. (Less)
Please use this url to cite or link to this publication:
https://lup.lub.lu.se/record/1bc287ec-909d-4faf-ae63-9bde14e3e85d
- author
- Lu, Yulin
LU
and Joosse, Paul
- organization
- publishing date
- 2024-11-29
- type
- Contribution to journal
- publication status
- published
- subject
- in
- Religion
- volume
- 55
- issue
- 1
- pages
- 20 pages
- publisher
- Taylor & Francis
- external identifiers
-
- scopus:85210735142
- ISSN
- 0048-721X
- DOI
- 10.1080/0048721X.2024.2418540
- language
- English
- LU publication?
- yes
- id
- 1bc287ec-909d-4faf-ae63-9bde14e3e85d
- date added to LUP
- 2025-01-16 19:23:03
- date last changed
- 2025-04-04 15:06:50
@article{1bc287ec-909d-4faf-ae63-9bde14e3e85d,
abstract = {{This study explores Buddhist monks’ views on the religion-science relationship in contemporary China. Drawing on survey data, interviews with monks, and participant observation within Shaolin Temple – famous for its antiquity and its export of Shaolin Kungfu – we discern and theoretically account for two forms of ‘non-conflict,’ between science and religion, that shape monks’ mental lives. One group holds an ‘independent non-conflict’ perspective, which sees religion and science being at peace chiefly because they are seen as being wholly non-interactive with of one another. Another group holds to ‘collaborative non-conflict’ perspective, which sees religion and science as existing in a mutually corroborative relationship because they tread on the same epistemic and sociocultural territory. Despite this bivalent amiability, we nevertheless encounter three tensions – relating to enchantment/disenchantment, epistemic authority, and technologically-induced secularization – that persist ‘underneath the peace’ between science and religion at Shaolin Temple.}},
author = {{Lu, Yulin and Joosse, Paul}},
issn = {{0048-721X}},
language = {{eng}},
month = {{11}},
number = {{1}},
pages = {{222--242}},
publisher = {{Taylor & Francis}},
series = {{Religion}},
title = {{Underneath the peace: Shaolin monks’ views on the relationship between Buddhism and science}},
url = {{http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/0048721X.2024.2418540}},
doi = {{10.1080/0048721X.2024.2418540}},
volume = {{55}},
year = {{2024}},
}