Advanced

Analytical Framework: Assessing Coherence, Management, Legitimacy and Effectiveness in an Institutional Nexus

Zelli, Fariborz LU ; Bäckstrand, Karin ; Nasiritousi, Naghmeh ; Pattberg, Philipp H. ; Sanderink, Lisa ; Skovgaard, Jakob LU ; van Asselt, Harro and Widerberg, Oscar (2020)
Abstract
This chapter establishes four evaluative themes that will be employed across this volume to analyze the institutional complexity of policy fields in the climate-energy nexus: coherence, management, legitimacy, and effectiveness. Coherence among institutions is conceptualized along four dimensions: convergence on an overarching core norm for the policy field, balanced coverage and distribution of memberships (private, public, hybrid), balanced coverage and distribution of governance functions (standards and commitments, operational activities, information and networking, financing), and mechanisms underlying cross-institutional relations (cognitive, normative, behavioural). Management will be examined according to types of managing agents,... (More)
This chapter establishes four evaluative themes that will be employed across this volume to analyze the institutional complexity of policy fields in the climate-energy nexus: coherence, management, legitimacy, and effectiveness. Coherence among institutions is conceptualized along four dimensions: convergence on an overarching core norm for the policy field, balanced coverage and distribution of memberships (private, public, hybrid), balanced coverage and distribution of governance functions (standards and commitments, operational activities, information and networking, financing), and mechanisms underlying cross-institutional relations (cognitive, normative, behavioural). Management will be examined according to types of managing agents, political levels (from domestic to global), and the consequences of management efforts in enhancing coherence. Legitimacy will be assessed along nine dimensions, among them expertise, transparency, accountability, or procedural and distributive fairness. Effectiveness, finally, will be examined in terms of normative and legal output produced by the institutions, their behaviour-changing outcome, and their ultimate problem-solving impact. Altogether, the four themes and their dimensions make up a novel framework for an in-depth analysis of a governance nexus. They help us examine a variety of important questions in a comparative research design, combining a high level of ambition with feasibility and novelty. (Less)
Please use this url to cite or link to this publication:
author
organization
publishing date
type
Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceeding
publication status
in press
subject
host publication
Governing the Climate-Energy Nexus : Challenges to Coherence, Legitimacy and Effectiveness - Challenges to Coherence, Legitimacy and Effectiveness
publisher
Cambridge University Press
ISBN
9781108676397
language
English
LU publication?
yes
id
1d75bcc1-f450-4552-ad88-6214dc03009c
date added to LUP
2020-03-28 20:30:23
date last changed
2020-03-30 10:31:01
@inbook{1d75bcc1-f450-4552-ad88-6214dc03009c,
  abstract     = {This chapter establishes four evaluative themes that will be employed across this volume to analyze the institutional complexity of policy fields in the climate-energy nexus: coherence, management, legitimacy, and effectiveness. Coherence among institutions is conceptualized along four dimensions: convergence on an overarching core norm for the policy field, balanced coverage and distribution of memberships (private, public, hybrid), balanced coverage and distribution of governance functions (standards and commitments, operational activities, information and networking, financing), and mechanisms underlying cross-institutional relations (cognitive, normative, behavioural). Management will be examined according to types of managing agents, political levels (from domestic to global), and the consequences of management efforts in enhancing coherence. Legitimacy will be assessed along nine dimensions, among them expertise, transparency, accountability, or procedural and distributive fairness. Effectiveness, finally, will be examined in terms of normative and legal output produced by the institutions, their behaviour-changing outcome, and their ultimate problem-solving impact. Altogether, the four themes and their dimensions make up a novel framework for an in-depth analysis of a governance nexus. They help us examine a variety of important questions in a comparative research design, combining a high level of ambition with feasibility and novelty. },
  author       = {Zelli, Fariborz and Bäckstrand, Karin and Nasiritousi, Naghmeh and Pattberg, Philipp H. and Sanderink, Lisa and Skovgaard, Jakob and van Asselt, Harro and Widerberg, Oscar},
  booktitle    = {Governing the Climate-Energy Nexus : Challenges to Coherence, Legitimacy and Effectiveness},
  isbn         = {9781108676397},
  language     = {eng},
  publisher    = {Cambridge University Press},
  title        = {Analytical Framework: Assessing Coherence, Management, Legitimacy and Effectiveness in an Institutional Nexus},
  year         = {2020},
}