Skip to main content

Lund University Publications

LUND UNIVERSITY LIBRARIES

Preferences for TB treatment and support delivery models among people living with TB in Eastern Cape, South Africa : a discrete choice experiment

Strauss, Michael ; George, Gavin LU ; Lansdell, Emma ; Fiphaza, Kuhle ; Medina-Marino, Andrew and Daniels, Joseph (2025) In Journal of the International AIDS Society 28(S3).
Abstract

Introduction: South Africa has one of the highest incidence rates of notified tuberculosis (TB) in the world. Achieving TB control requires strengthening treatment and support services. The implementation of differentiated delivery models can be used to improve service quality and enhance retention in care. This study aimed to identify treatment and support delivery preferences among people on TB treatment, specifically examining gender differences, to inform the development of differentiated care models for improving engagement and retention in TB treatment services. Methods: A binary, unlabelled, fractional factorial design discrete choice experiment (DCE) was used to investigate preferences for TB treatment adherence support and... (More)

Introduction: South Africa has one of the highest incidence rates of notified tuberculosis (TB) in the world. Achieving TB control requires strengthening treatment and support services. The implementation of differentiated delivery models can be used to improve service quality and enhance retention in care. This study aimed to identify treatment and support delivery preferences among people on TB treatment, specifically examining gender differences, to inform the development of differentiated care models for improving engagement and retention in TB treatment services. Methods: A binary, unlabelled, fractional factorial design discrete choice experiment (DCE) was used to investigate preferences for TB treatment adherence support and service delivery. Attributes included who provides the support, how and where support is delivered, medication collection location and frequency of clinic visits. The DCE was administered to individuals who were currently on or recently completed TB treatment, and to those at-risk for being lost-to-care. Data from 284 individuals for the DCE were collected from March to August 2022. Mixed effects logistic regression models were used as primary analysis tools. Latent class analysis (LCA) was used to explore heterogeneity in preference structures. Results: Compared to standard clinic-based treatment collection, participants preferred collecting their treatment from a mobile community-based location (ß = 0.231; 95% CI: 0.08–0.39), clinic-based fast-tracked pick-ups (ß = 0.539; 95% CI: 0.38–0.70) or home delivery (ß = 0.563; 95% CI: 0.37–0.75). Participants also significantly preferred support offered monthly compared to once-off (ß = 0.167; 95% CI: 0.01–0.32). Furthermore, participants preferred face-to-face support over group (ß = –0.142; 95% CI: –0.27 to –0.02) or phone-based (ß = –0.222; 95% CI: –0.36 to –0.09) support models. LCA revealed three classes with statistically similar preference structures; Class 1 (62%) preferred community-based treatment delivery and support services; Class 2 (28%) preferred clinic-based support and treatment delivery services; and Class 3 (10%), preferred self-selected peer navigator or nurse delivered, and group models of support and prioritised the location of medication pickups, with a preference for any model other than standard clinic collection. Conclusions: Though preference structures did not differ by gender, respondents revealed strong preferences for differentiated service delivery models. Future TB treatment and support interventions must include both clinic- and community-based models of care and support to ensure that those living with TB are provided the greatest access to TB treatment and support services.

(Less)
Please use this url to cite or link to this publication:
author
; ; ; ; and
organization
publishing date
type
Contribution to journal
publication status
published
subject
keywords
adherence, Africa, discrete choice experiment, preferences, public health, tuberculosis
in
Journal of the International AIDS Society
volume
28
issue
S3
article number
e26506
publisher
International AIDS Society
external identifiers
  • pmid:40622363
  • scopus:105009938441
ISSN
1758-2652
DOI
10.1002/jia2.26506
language
English
LU publication?
yes
additional info
Publisher Copyright: © 2025 The Author(s). Journal of the International AIDS Society published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd on behalf of the International AIDS Society.
id
1f18e99f-e08f-45ba-a474-11ef80518741
date added to LUP
2025-12-15 13:25:06
date last changed
2026-01-12 16:28:20
@article{1f18e99f-e08f-45ba-a474-11ef80518741,
  abstract     = {{<p>Introduction: South Africa has one of the highest incidence rates of notified tuberculosis (TB) in the world. Achieving TB control requires strengthening treatment and support services. The implementation of differentiated delivery models can be used to improve service quality and enhance retention in care. This study aimed to identify treatment and support delivery preferences among people on TB treatment, specifically examining gender differences, to inform the development of differentiated care models for improving engagement and retention in TB treatment services. Methods: A binary, unlabelled, fractional factorial design discrete choice experiment (DCE) was used to investigate preferences for TB treatment adherence support and service delivery. Attributes included who provides the support, how and where support is delivered, medication collection location and frequency of clinic visits. The DCE was administered to individuals who were currently on or recently completed TB treatment, and to those at-risk for being lost-to-care. Data from 284 individuals for the DCE were collected from March to August 2022. Mixed effects logistic regression models were used as primary analysis tools. Latent class analysis (LCA) was used to explore heterogeneity in preference structures. Results: Compared to standard clinic-based treatment collection, participants preferred collecting their treatment from a mobile community-based location (ß = 0.231; 95% CI: 0.08–0.39), clinic-based fast-tracked pick-ups (ß = 0.539; 95% CI: 0.38–0.70) or home delivery (ß = 0.563; 95% CI: 0.37–0.75). Participants also significantly preferred support offered monthly compared to once-off (ß = 0.167; 95% CI: 0.01–0.32). Furthermore, participants preferred face-to-face support over group (ß = –0.142; 95% CI: –0.27 to –0.02) or phone-based (ß = –0.222; 95% CI: –0.36 to –0.09) support models. LCA revealed three classes with statistically similar preference structures; Class 1 (62%) preferred community-based treatment delivery and support services; Class 2 (28%) preferred clinic-based support and treatment delivery services; and Class 3 (10%), preferred self-selected peer navigator or nurse delivered, and group models of support and prioritised the location of medication pickups, with a preference for any model other than standard clinic collection. Conclusions: Though preference structures did not differ by gender, respondents revealed strong preferences for differentiated service delivery models. Future TB treatment and support interventions must include both clinic- and community-based models of care and support to ensure that those living with TB are provided the greatest access to TB treatment and support services.</p>}},
  author       = {{Strauss, Michael and George, Gavin and Lansdell, Emma and Fiphaza, Kuhle and Medina-Marino, Andrew and Daniels, Joseph}},
  issn         = {{1758-2652}},
  keywords     = {{adherence; Africa; discrete choice experiment; preferences; public health; tuberculosis}},
  language     = {{eng}},
  number       = {{S3}},
  publisher    = {{International AIDS Society}},
  series       = {{Journal of the International AIDS Society}},
  title        = {{Preferences for TB treatment and support delivery models among people living with TB in Eastern Cape, South Africa : a discrete choice experiment}},
  url          = {{http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/jia2.26506}},
  doi          = {{10.1002/jia2.26506}},
  volume       = {{28}},
  year         = {{2025}},
}