Advanced

C. J. L. Almqvists slottskrönika och det indirekta skrivsättet

Persson, Eivor LU (2003) In Critica Litterarum Lundensis 4.
Abstract (Swedish)
Popular Abstract in Swedish

Ämnet för denna tematiska och berättartekniska studie i litteraturvetenskap är C. J. L. Almqvists slottskrönika och det indirekta skrivsättet. Slottskrönikan omfattar romanerna Jaktslottet (1833), Hinden (1833) och Baron Julius K*. Ur Fröken Eleonoras Reseminnen (1835), vilka belyses med hjälp av Almqvists uppsats Om två slags Skrifsätt (1833). Denna infogades senare i Dialog om Sättet att sluta Stycken, som liksom slottskrönikan ingår i Almqvists stora samlingsverk Törnrosens bok. Med ett indirekt skrivsätt behöver författaren inte yttra allt, kanske inte ens det viktigaste. Den medskapande läsaren får då komplettera texten utifrån författarens indikationer i denna. Det är detta skrivsätt med... (More)
Popular Abstract in Swedish

Ämnet för denna tematiska och berättartekniska studie i litteraturvetenskap är C. J. L. Almqvists slottskrönika och det indirekta skrivsättet. Slottskrönikan omfattar romanerna Jaktslottet (1833), Hinden (1833) och Baron Julius K*. Ur Fröken Eleonoras Reseminnen (1835), vilka belyses med hjälp av Almqvists uppsats Om två slags Skrifsätt (1833). Denna infogades senare i Dialog om Sättet att sluta Stycken, som liksom slottskrönikan ingår i Almqvists stora samlingsverk Törnrosens bok. Med ett indirekt skrivsätt behöver författaren inte yttra allt, kanske inte ens det viktigaste. Den medskapande läsaren får då komplettera texten utifrån författarens indikationer i denna. Det är detta skrivsätt med dess gåtor och problem som står i centrum för intresset i denna avhandling. I första och andra kapitlet analyseras några gåtor och därmed sammanhängande motiv i Hinden och Baron Julius K*, den okända bördens motiv respektive spökmotivet, som visar sig vara karaktäristiska även för Almqvists verk i stort. Den i de nämnda romanerna antydda bördsmystifikationen resulterar i två helt olika berättelser, en narrativ tvetydighet, beroende på vem som anses vara Julianus Löwenstjernas fader, Andreas Löwenstjerna eller baron Julius K*. Den gåtfulla slutscenen i Hinden tolkas i ljuset av spökmotivet med dess sammanblandning av levande och döda. Denna och andra scener i slottskrönikan kan ges en naturlig förklaring, men även en övernaturlig sådan är möjlig. I tredje och fjärde kapitlet undersöks självreflexionen i slottskrönikan med dess självbespeglande komposition, tematik och handling. Den till synes utelämnade romanen, som aviseras av tant Eleonora i hennes romanskiss i Hinden, kan vara resten av Hinden och Baron Julius K*. I femte kapitlet utforskas slottskrönikans samspel med verk av bland andra Fredrik Cederborgh, Johann Caspar Lavater, William Shakespeare och Walter Scott, vilket förstärker textens tematiska enhet. (Less)
Abstract
The subject of this thematic and narrative-technical study is the Swedish author Carl Jonas Love Almqvist's (1793-1866) slottskrönika (castle chronicle) and the indirect way of writing. The castle chronicle comprises the novels Jaktslottet (The Hunting Castle; 1833), Hinden (The Hind; 1833) and Baron Julius K* (1835), all of which are included in Almqvist's great collective work, Törnrosens bok (The Briar-rose Book). Almqvist's way of writing is described with the help of his essay Om två slags Skrifsätt (On two kinds of writing; 1833), which later was introduced into his fictional piece Dialog om Sättet att sluta Stycken (Dialogue on how to end a piece; 1835). Here Almqvist delineates his aesthetic ideal, the indirect way of writing and... (More)
The subject of this thematic and narrative-technical study is the Swedish author Carl Jonas Love Almqvist's (1793-1866) slottskrönika (castle chronicle) and the indirect way of writing. The castle chronicle comprises the novels Jaktslottet (The Hunting Castle; 1833), Hinden (The Hind; 1833) and Baron Julius K* (1835), all of which are included in Almqvist's great collective work, Törnrosens bok (The Briar-rose Book). Almqvist's way of writing is described with the help of his essay Om två slags Skrifsätt (On two kinds of writing; 1833), which later was introduced into his fictional piece Dialog om Sättet att sluta Stycken (Dialogue on how to end a piece; 1835). Here Almqvist delineates his aesthetic ideal, the indirect way of writing and the aesthetics of the unfinished. The author does not express everything explicitly, nor perhaps even what is most important, but expects the co-creative reader to complete the text in accordance with its implications. The enigmas and problems in the castle chronicle associated with this kind of writing are highlighted in this thesis. The first chapter is an examination of one of the typical motifs in Almqvist's oeuvre, the question of the mysterious parentage in Hinden and Baron Julius K*, contributing to the thematic unity of these novels. The problem of Julianus's lineage is analyzed in terms of Roland Barthes's hermeneutic code, the voice of truth in the text, but two completely different stories emerge on account of the narrative ambiguity of the text concerning the identity of Julianus's father. The second chapter is a study of the ghost motif in Hinden and Baron Julius K*, and especially of the confusion of the living and the dead. The enigmatic final scene in Hinden is interpreted in the light of this motif characteristic of Almqvist's fiction. The ambiguous scenes in the novels are given a natural explanation, but a supernatural explanation is also possible. In the third and fourth chapter the different forms of self-reflection in the castle chronicle are examined. A possible solution to the problem of the apparently omitted novel promised by aunt Eleonora in her story outline in Hinden is that the remainder of Hinden and Baron Julius K* constitute a free performance of the outline. What Friedrich Schlegel calls a symmetry of opposites, a principle of composition typical of Almqvist's oeuvre, can be observed in the trilogy. Its explicit and implicit aesthetic views and ideals are analyzed. In the fifth chapter the intertextual background of the castle chronicle is explored: the writings of the Swedish novelist Fredrik Cederborgh, Johann Caspar Lavater, Laurence Sterne, Emanuel Swedenborg, William Shakespeare, Walter Scott and Lord Byron. (Less)
Please use this url to cite or link to this publication:
author
opponent
  • F D Nordin, Ulla, Södertörns högskola
organization
alternative title
C. J. L. Almqvist's Castle Chronicle and the Indirect Way of Writing
publishing date
type
Thesis
publication status
published
subject
keywords
literary theory, literature criticism, General and comparative literature, narratology, intertextuality, the sublime, metafiction, ambiguity, hermeneutic code, Shlomith Rimmon-Kenan, ghosts, Roland Barthes, enigma, unknown parentage, Allmän och jämförande litteratur, litteraturkritik, litteraturteori, Scandinavian languages and literature, Nordiska språk (språk och litteratur)
in
Critica Litterarum Lundensis
volume
4
pages
364 pages
publisher
Comparative Literature
defense location
Edens hörsal, Paradisg 5, Lund
defense date
2003-10-11 10:15
ISSN
1651-2367
ISBN
91-970946-3-3
language
Swedish
LU publication?
yes
id
4f9c333f-a860-4bf9-a8b1-0881faabaef8 (old id 20947)
date added to LUP
2007-05-28 11:42:01
date last changed
2018-05-29 10:27:18
@phdthesis{4f9c333f-a860-4bf9-a8b1-0881faabaef8,
  abstract     = {The subject of this thematic and narrative-technical study is the Swedish author Carl Jonas Love Almqvist's (1793-1866) slottskrönika (castle chronicle) and the indirect way of writing. The castle chronicle comprises the novels Jaktslottet (The Hunting Castle; 1833), Hinden (The Hind; 1833) and Baron Julius K* (1835), all of which are included in Almqvist's great collective work, Törnrosens bok (The Briar-rose Book). Almqvist's way of writing is described with the help of his essay Om två slags Skrifsätt (On two kinds of writing; 1833), which later was introduced into his fictional piece Dialog om Sättet att sluta Stycken (Dialogue on how to end a piece; 1835). Here Almqvist delineates his aesthetic ideal, the indirect way of writing and the aesthetics of the unfinished. The author does not express everything explicitly, nor perhaps even what is most important, but expects the co-creative reader to complete the text in accordance with its implications. The enigmas and problems in the castle chronicle associated with this kind of writing are highlighted in this thesis. The first chapter is an examination of one of the typical motifs in Almqvist's oeuvre, the question of the mysterious parentage in Hinden and Baron Julius K*, contributing to the thematic unity of these novels. The problem of Julianus's lineage is analyzed in terms of Roland Barthes's hermeneutic code, the voice of truth in the text, but two completely different stories emerge on account of the narrative ambiguity of the text concerning the identity of Julianus's father. The second chapter is a study of the ghost motif in Hinden and Baron Julius K*, and especially of the confusion of the living and the dead. The enigmatic final scene in Hinden is interpreted in the light of this motif characteristic of Almqvist's fiction. The ambiguous scenes in the novels are given a natural explanation, but a supernatural explanation is also possible. In the third and fourth chapter the different forms of self-reflection in the castle chronicle are examined. A possible solution to the problem of the apparently omitted novel promised by aunt Eleonora in her story outline in Hinden is that the remainder of Hinden and Baron Julius K* constitute a free performance of the outline. What Friedrich Schlegel calls a symmetry of opposites, a principle of composition typical of Almqvist's oeuvre, can be observed in the trilogy. Its explicit and implicit aesthetic views and ideals are analyzed. In the fifth chapter the intertextual background of the castle chronicle is explored: the writings of the Swedish novelist Fredrik Cederborgh, Johann Caspar Lavater, Laurence Sterne, Emanuel Swedenborg, William Shakespeare, Walter Scott and Lord Byron.},
  author       = {Persson, Eivor},
  isbn         = {91-970946-3-3},
  issn         = {1651-2367},
  keyword      = {literary theory,literature criticism,General and comparative literature,narratology,intertextuality,the sublime,metafiction,ambiguity,hermeneutic code,Shlomith Rimmon-Kenan,ghosts,Roland Barthes,enigma,unknown parentage,Allmän och jämförande litteratur,litteraturkritik,litteraturteori,Scandinavian languages and literature,Nordiska språk (språk och litteratur)},
  language     = {swe},
  pages        = {364},
  publisher    = {Comparative Literature},
  school       = {Lund University},
  series       = {Critica Litterarum Lundensis},
  title        = {C. J. L. Almqvists slottskrönika och det indirekta skrivsättet},
  volume       = {4},
  year         = {2003},
}