Skip to main content

Lund University Publications

LUND UNIVERSITY LIBRARIES

Analytical dual flip angle R1 calculation outside the small-angle regime

Edwards, Luke J ; Pine, Kerrin J. ; Lipp, Ilona ; EBC, Consortium ; Kirilina, Evgeniya ; Helms, Gunther LU orcid and Weiskopf, Nikolaus (2025) In Magnetic Resonance in Medicine
Abstract
Purpose:
To evaluate a new analytical estimator for R1 and apparent proton density (𝐴) from short-TR dual flip angle data which does not rely on the small flip angle approximation and can thus be applied to a broader range of data, especially where relatively large flip angles are needed to achieve sufficient T1-weighting for R1 estimation.
Theory and Methods:
A rational approximation of the Ernst equation was derived for small R1 ⋅ TR and rearranged to give analytical estimators of R1 and 𝐴 from dual flip angle data. Unlike previously used analytical estimators, this method relies neither on the flip angles being small nor the two TRs being equal or integer multiples of each other. R1 and 𝐴 estimated using the novel method... (More)
Purpose:
To evaluate a new analytical estimator for R1 and apparent proton density (𝐴) from short-TR dual flip angle data which does not rely on the small flip angle approximation and can thus be applied to a broader range of data, especially where relatively large flip angles are needed to achieve sufficient T1-weighting for R1 estimation.
Theory and Methods:
A rational approximation of the Ernst equation was derived for small R1 ⋅ TR and rearranged to give analytical estimators of R1 and 𝐴 from dual flip angle data. Unlike previously used analytical estimators, this method relies neither on the flip angles being small nor the two TRs being equal or integer multiples of each other. R1 and 𝐴 estimated using the novel method were compared to estimates using the conventional small-angle approximation approach in simulations and data measured at 7T from six in vivo human participants and a postmortem chimpanzee brain. Test–retest scans of the six participants were used to evaluate within-participant coefficients of variance (WCV) of R1 and 𝐴 using the two methods.
Results:
The small-angle approximation gave rise to a flip angle-dependent bias in all cases. This bias was not observed using the novel method, demonstrating its higher accuracy. There were only negligible differences in WCV between the methods, demonstrating that precision is preserved.
Conclusion:
The increase in accuracy and preservation of precision suggest that the novel method should be used instead of the current small flip angle method. (Less)
Please use this url to cite or link to this publication:
author
; ; ; ; ; and
organization
publishing date
type
Contribution to journal
publication status
published
subject
keywords
ex vivo imaging, in vivo histology, longitudinal relaxation, T1 relaxometry
in
Magnetic Resonance in Medicine
publisher
John Wiley & Sons Inc.
external identifiers
  • scopus:105023979091
ISSN
1522-2594
DOI
10.1002/mrm.70174
language
English
LU publication?
yes
id
20b5e386-ea7c-4968-9e0e-8b321eeffdc6
date added to LUP
2026-01-10 21:07:25
date last changed
2026-01-12 08:47:48
@article{20b5e386-ea7c-4968-9e0e-8b321eeffdc6,
  abstract     = {{Purpose: <br/>To evaluate a new analytical estimator for R1 and apparent proton density (𝐴) from short-TR dual flip angle data which does not rely on the small flip angle approximation and can thus be applied to a broader range of data, especially where relatively large flip angles are needed to achieve sufficient T1-weighting for R1 estimation.<br/>Theory and Methods: <br/>A rational approximation of the Ernst equation was derived for small R1 ⋅ TR and rearranged to give analytical estimators of R1 and 𝐴 from dual flip angle data. Unlike previously used analytical estimators, this method relies neither on the flip angles being small nor the two TRs being equal or integer multiples of each other. R1 and 𝐴 estimated using the novel method were compared to estimates using the conventional small-angle approximation approach in simulations and data measured at 7T from six in vivo human participants and a postmortem chimpanzee brain. Test–retest scans of the six participants were used to evaluate within-participant coefficients of variance (WCV) of R1 and 𝐴 using the two methods.<br/>Results: <br/>The small-angle approximation gave rise to a flip angle-dependent bias in all cases. This bias was not observed using the novel method, demonstrating its higher accuracy. There were only negligible differences in WCV between the methods, demonstrating that precision is preserved.<br/>Conclusion: <br/>The increase in accuracy and preservation of precision suggest that the novel method should be used instead of the current small flip angle method.}},
  author       = {{Edwards, Luke J and Pine, Kerrin J. and Lipp, Ilona and EBC, Consortium and Kirilina, Evgeniya and Helms, Gunther and Weiskopf, Nikolaus}},
  issn         = {{1522-2594}},
  keywords     = {{ex vivo imaging; in vivo histology; longitudinal relaxation; T1 relaxometry}},
  language     = {{eng}},
  publisher    = {{John Wiley & Sons Inc.}},
  series       = {{Magnetic Resonance in Medicine}},
  title        = {{Analytical dual flip angle R1 calculation outside the small-angle regime}},
  url          = {{http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/mrm.70174}},
  doi          = {{10.1002/mrm.70174}},
  year         = {{2025}},
}