Dosimetric effects of adaptive prostate cancer radiotherapy in an MR-linac workflow
Mannerberg, Annika LU ; Persson, Emilia LU ; Jonsson, Joakim ; Gustafsson, Christian Jamtheim LU ; Gunnlaugsson, Adalsteinn LU ; Olsson, Lars E. LU
and Ceberg, Sofie
LU
(2020)
In Radiation oncology (London, England)
15(1).
- Abstract
BACKGROUND: The purpose was to evaluate the dosimetric effects in prostate cancer treatment caused by anatomical changes occurring during the time frame of adaptive replanning in a magnetic resonance linear accelerator (MR-linac) workflow. METHODS: Two MR images (MR1 and MR2) were acquired with 30 min apart for each of the 35 patients enrolled in this study. The clinical target volume (CTV) and organs at risk (OARs) were delineated based on MR1. Using a synthetic CT (sCT), ultra-hypofractionated VMAT treatment plans were created for MR1, with three different planning target volume (PTV) margins of 7 mm, 5 mm and 3 mm. The three treatment plans of MR1, were recalculated onto MR2 using its corresponding sCT. The dose distribution of MR2... (More)
BACKGROUND: The purpose was to evaluate the dosimetric effects in prostate cancer treatment caused by anatomical changes occurring during the time frame of adaptive replanning in a magnetic resonance linear accelerator (MR-linac) workflow. METHODS: Two MR images (MR1 and MR2) were acquired with 30 min apart for each of the 35 patients enrolled in this study. The clinical target volume (CTV) and organs at risk (OARs) were delineated based on MR1. Using a synthetic CT (sCT), ultra-hypofractionated VMAT treatment plans were created for MR1, with three different planning target volume (PTV) margins of 7 mm, 5 mm and 3 mm. The three treatment plans of MR1, were recalculated onto MR2 using its corresponding sCT. The dose distribution of MR2 represented delivered dose to the patient after 30 min of adaptive replanning, omitting motion correction before beam on. MR2 was registered to MR1, using deformable registration. Using the inverse deformation, the structures of MR1 was deformed to fit MR2 and anatomical changes were quantified. For dose distribution comparison the dose distribution of MR2 was warped to the geometry MR1. RESULTS: The mean center of mass vector offset for the CTV was 1.92 mm [0.13 - 9.79 mm]. Bladder volume increase ranged from 12.4 to 133.0% and rectum volume difference varied between -10.9 and 38.8%. Using the conventional 7 mm planning target volume (PTV) margin the dose reduction to the CTV was 1.1%. Corresponding values for 5 mm and 3 mm PTV margin were 2.0% and 4.2% respectively. The dose to the PTV and OARs also decreased from D1 to D2, for all PTV margins evaluated. Statistically significant difference was found for CTV Dmin between D1 and D2 for the 3 mm PTV margin (p < 0.01). CONCLUSIONS: A target underdosage caused by anatomical changes occurring during the reported time frame for adaptive replanning MR-linac workflows was found. Volume changes in both bladder and rectum caused large prostate displacements. This indicates the importance of thorough position verification before treatment delivery and that the workflow needs to speed up before introducing margin reduction.
(Less)
- author
- Mannerberg, Annika
LU
; Persson, Emilia
LU
; Jonsson, Joakim
; Gustafsson, Christian Jamtheim
LU
; Gunnlaugsson, Adalsteinn
LU
; Olsson, Lars E.
LU
and Ceberg, Sofie
LU
- organization
- publishing date
- 2020-07-10
- type
- Contribution to journal
- publication status
- published
- subject
- keywords
- Intrafractional motion, Motion induced dose effects, MR-linac, Prostate radiotherapy
- in
- Radiation oncology (London, England)
- volume
- 15
- issue
- 1
- article number
- 168
- publisher
- BioMed Central (BMC)
- external identifiers
-
- pmid:32650811
- scopus:85088205066
- ISSN
- 1748-717X
- DOI
- 10.1186/s13014-020-01604-5
- language
- English
- LU publication?
- yes
- id
- 20b7d673-53ce-48c5-99ae-6e663196f375
- date added to LUP
- 2020-07-29 10:25:29
- date last changed
- 2024-04-03 09:05:24
@article{20b7d673-53ce-48c5-99ae-6e663196f375,
abstract = {{<p>BACKGROUND: The purpose was to evaluate the dosimetric effects in prostate cancer treatment caused by anatomical changes occurring during the time frame of adaptive replanning in a magnetic resonance linear accelerator (MR-linac) workflow. METHODS: Two MR images (MR1 and MR2) were acquired with 30 min apart for each of the 35 patients enrolled in this study. The clinical target volume (CTV) and organs at risk (OARs) were delineated based on MR1. Using a synthetic CT (sCT), ultra-hypofractionated VMAT treatment plans were created for MR1, with three different planning target volume (PTV) margins of 7 mm, 5 mm and 3 mm. The three treatment plans of MR1, were recalculated onto MR2 using its corresponding sCT. The dose distribution of MR2 represented delivered dose to the patient after 30 min of adaptive replanning, omitting motion correction before beam on. MR2 was registered to MR1, using deformable registration. Using the inverse deformation, the structures of MR1 was deformed to fit MR2 and anatomical changes were quantified. For dose distribution comparison the dose distribution of MR2 was warped to the geometry MR1. RESULTS: The mean center of mass vector offset for the CTV was 1.92 mm [0.13 - 9.79 mm]. Bladder volume increase ranged from 12.4 to 133.0% and rectum volume difference varied between -10.9 and 38.8%. Using the conventional 7 mm planning target volume (PTV) margin the dose reduction to the CTV was 1.1%. Corresponding values for 5 mm and 3 mm PTV margin were 2.0% and 4.2% respectively. The dose to the PTV and OARs also decreased from D1 to D2, for all PTV margins evaluated. Statistically significant difference was found for CTV Dmin between D1 and D2 for the 3 mm PTV margin (p < 0.01). CONCLUSIONS: A target underdosage caused by anatomical changes occurring during the reported time frame for adaptive replanning MR-linac workflows was found. Volume changes in both bladder and rectum caused large prostate displacements. This indicates the importance of thorough position verification before treatment delivery and that the workflow needs to speed up before introducing margin reduction.</p>}},
author = {{Mannerberg, Annika and Persson, Emilia and Jonsson, Joakim and Gustafsson, Christian Jamtheim and Gunnlaugsson, Adalsteinn and Olsson, Lars E. and Ceberg, Sofie}},
issn = {{1748-717X}},
keywords = {{Intrafractional motion; Motion induced dose effects; MR-linac; Prostate radiotherapy}},
language = {{eng}},
month = {{07}},
number = {{1}},
publisher = {{BioMed Central (BMC)}},
series = {{Radiation oncology (London, England)}},
title = {{Dosimetric effects of adaptive prostate cancer radiotherapy in an MR-linac workflow}},
url = {{http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13014-020-01604-5}},
doi = {{10.1186/s13014-020-01604-5}},
volume = {{15}},
year = {{2020}},
}