Le syllogisme sophistique selon Simon de Faversham et Raoul le Breton : entre formalisme et pragmatique
Emamzadah, Parwana and Mora Marquez, Ana Maria LU
(2023)
In Archives d'Histoire Doctrinale et Littéraire du Moyen Age
90(1).
p.113-134
- Abstract
The aim of this article is to show that at the end of the 13th century there’s a change of approach to the sophistical syllogism, going from a definition based on its formal features to a definition based on its pragmatic features. The first position is put forward by Simon of Faversham, during the 1280s, probably during his stay in Paris. The second position is put forward by Radulphus Brito, the last of the great Parisian Masters of Arts of the 13th century. In their positions we will find, then, a crucial disagreement regarding the nature of the sophistical syllogism.
Please use this url to cite or link to this publication:
https://lup.lub.lu.se/record/217eea22-3fea-4805-b053-bf78ee88a00d
- author
- Emamzadah, Parwana
and Mora Marquez, Ana Maria
LU
- alternative title
- The sophistical syllogism according to Simon de Faversham and Raoul le Breton : Between formalism and pragmatics
- publishing date
- 2023
- type
- Contribution to journal
- publication status
- published
- subject
- keywords
- Medieval Philosophy
- in
- Archives d'Histoire Doctrinale et Littéraire du Moyen Age
- volume
- 90
- issue
- 1
- pages
- 22 pages
- publisher
- Librairie Philosophique J. Vrin
- external identifiers
-
- scopus:85192023477
- DOI
- 10.3917/ahdlm.090.0113
- language
- French
- LU publication?
- no
- id
- 217eea22-3fea-4805-b053-bf78ee88a00d
- date added to LUP
- 2025-01-25 16:39:21
- date last changed
- 2025-04-04 14:28:15
@article{217eea22-3fea-4805-b053-bf78ee88a00d,
abstract = {{<p>The aim of this article is to show that at the end of the 13th century there’s a change of approach to the sophistical syllogism, going from a definition based on its formal features to a definition based on its pragmatic features. The first position is put forward by Simon of Faversham, during the 1280s, probably during his stay in Paris. The second position is put forward by Radulphus Brito, the last of the great Parisian Masters of Arts of the 13th century. In their positions we will find, then, a crucial disagreement regarding the nature of the sophistical syllogism.</p>}},
author = {{Emamzadah, Parwana and Mora Marquez, Ana Maria}},
keywords = {{Medieval Philosophy}},
language = {{fre}},
number = {{1}},
pages = {{113--134}},
publisher = {{Librairie Philosophique J. Vrin}},
series = {{Archives d'Histoire Doctrinale et Littéraire du Moyen Age}},
title = {{Le syllogisme sophistique selon Simon de Faversham et Raoul le Breton : entre formalisme et pragmatique}},
url = {{http://dx.doi.org/10.3917/ahdlm.090.0113}},
doi = {{10.3917/ahdlm.090.0113}},
volume = {{90}},
year = {{2023}},
}