Skip to main content

Lund University Publications

LUND UNIVERSITY LIBRARIES

Estimating charging infrastructure demand for electric vehicles : a systematic review

Xylia, Maria ; Olsson, Erik ; Macura, Biljana and Nykvist, Björn LU orcid (2025) In Energy Strategy Reviews 59.
Abstract

Establishing robust charging infrastructure is crucial for electric vehicle (EV) adoption. This study addresses the lack of systematic literature reviews examining the global charging infrastructure research landscape with a comprehensive review of English literature published between 2017 and 2023. We screened 12237 records, and analyzed 137 peer-reviewed and 31 grey literature studies. Findings reveal a mean and median public charging demand of 135 and 23 EVs/charger respectively – that is, a much more efficient utilization of chargers than the current public charging global average (10 EVs/charger). The differences are explained by aggregation of charging strategies – fast and super-fast charging can support 5 to 10 times as many... (More)

Establishing robust charging infrastructure is crucial for electric vehicle (EV) adoption. This study addresses the lack of systematic literature reviews examining the global charging infrastructure research landscape with a comprehensive review of English literature published between 2017 and 2023. We screened 12237 records, and analyzed 137 peer-reviewed and 31 grey literature studies. Findings reveal a mean and median public charging demand of 135 and 23 EVs/charger respectively – that is, a much more efficient utilization of chargers than the current public charging global average (10 EVs/charger). The differences are explained by aggregation of charging strategies – fast and super-fast charging can support 5 to 10 times as many vehicles per charger – but also a wide range of assumption used across studies, apparently deviating from actual deployment. We also identify a need for more forward-looking research given evolving technologies and policy ambitions. Further research is necessary for underrepresented regions like Africa and Latin America, and different vehicle types, such as heavy and light-duty commercial vehicles. Recommendations to the research community, policymakers, and practitioners include exploring complementary metrics beyond the widely used EVs/charger and addressing ambiguous charging definitions.

(Less)
Please use this url to cite or link to this publication:
author
; ; and
organization
publishing date
type
Contribution to journal
publication status
published
subject
keywords
Buses, Charging demand, Electric trucks, Electric vehicles, Passenger vehicles, Systematic evidence synthesis, Transport planning
in
Energy Strategy Reviews
volume
59
article number
101753
publisher
Elsevier
external identifiers
  • scopus:105004381251
ISSN
2211-467X
DOI
10.1016/j.esr.2025.101753
language
English
LU publication?
yes
id
231fa146-1764-4771-8cd3-f2ae7d523177
date added to LUP
2025-08-04 12:00:07
date last changed
2025-08-04 12:00:41
@article{231fa146-1764-4771-8cd3-f2ae7d523177,
  abstract     = {{<p>Establishing robust charging infrastructure is crucial for electric vehicle (EV) adoption. This study addresses the lack of systematic literature reviews examining the global charging infrastructure research landscape with a comprehensive review of English literature published between 2017 and 2023. We screened 12237 records, and analyzed 137 peer-reviewed and 31 grey literature studies. Findings reveal a mean and median public charging demand of 135 and 23 EVs/charger respectively – that is, a much more efficient utilization of chargers than the current public charging global average (10 EVs/charger). The differences are explained by aggregation of charging strategies – fast and super-fast charging can support 5 to 10 times as many vehicles per charger – but also a wide range of assumption used across studies, apparently deviating from actual deployment. We also identify a need for more forward-looking research given evolving technologies and policy ambitions. Further research is necessary for underrepresented regions like Africa and Latin America, and different vehicle types, such as heavy and light-duty commercial vehicles. Recommendations to the research community, policymakers, and practitioners include exploring complementary metrics beyond the widely used EVs/charger and addressing ambiguous charging definitions.</p>}},
  author       = {{Xylia, Maria and Olsson, Erik and Macura, Biljana and Nykvist, Björn}},
  issn         = {{2211-467X}},
  keywords     = {{Buses; Charging demand; Electric trucks; Electric vehicles; Passenger vehicles; Systematic evidence synthesis; Transport planning}},
  language     = {{eng}},
  publisher    = {{Elsevier}},
  series       = {{Energy Strategy Reviews}},
  title        = {{Estimating charging infrastructure demand for electric vehicles : a systematic review}},
  url          = {{http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.esr.2025.101753}},
  doi          = {{10.1016/j.esr.2025.101753}},
  volume       = {{59}},
  year         = {{2025}},
}