Advanced

Mobilising Global Bioenergy Supply Chains: Keys to unlocking the potential of bioenergy

Peck, Philip LU ; Berndes, Göran and Hektor, Bo (2011) In IIIEE Reports 2011:02.
Abstract
This work is underlain by broad-based expectations that policy interventions such as EU 2020 goals for renewable energy will continue to drive increased international trade in biomass for energy. This work focuses on where and how large volumes of biomass for bioenergy may be brought to the market in the short to medium term and sought insights in the following areas:

• the manner in which demand for biofuels can be driven by political goals;

• the realism of expectations that biofuels can achieve political goals;

• the nature of production/consumption structures and potential in different regions;

• competence and resource needs for international bioenergy trade;

• the nature of synergies and... (More)
This work is underlain by broad-based expectations that policy interventions such as EU 2020 goals for renewable energy will continue to drive increased international trade in biomass for energy. This work focuses on where and how large volumes of biomass for bioenergy may be brought to the market in the short to medium term and sought insights in the following areas:

• the manner in which demand for biofuels can be driven by political goals;

• the realism of expectations that biofuels can achieve political goals;

• the nature of production/consumption structures and potential in different regions;

• competence and resource needs for international bioenergy trade;

• the nature of synergies and competition with incumbent industries.

The work first examines immaturity and diversity in the bioenergy industry, and then presents and dissects policy cases to examine policy-making strengths and weaknesses. Management literature for emerging industrial sectors and policy literature are then used to support analysis of challenges posed by diversity in geographical, socio-economic conditions, and by energy carrier and supply chains differences. Arguments are then developed that a significant contribution to progress can be made by enhancing collective action; ‘standardisation’ of ‘bioenergy offerings’; building the profession and professionalism; by improved interplay with other industries and stakeholders, and by improved input to policy-making processes.

The report then presents quantifications for biomass resources potentially available in the near to medium term. These include residue flows from agriculture and forestry, and new dedicated agriculture-derived feedstock supply systems. Importantly, modelling supporting this analysis indicates that there is substantial scope for land-minimizing growth of world food supply. This is feasible through efficiency improvements in the food chains from existing land-in-use. Scenarios presented here indicate that it is feasible to reduce global agricultural requirements some 230 Mha from current levels while still meeting dietary requirements (mainstream FAO estimates indicate expansion by 280Mha). This provides significant scope for expansion of dedicated energy crops. If higher productivity is combined with dietary changes toward less land-demanding food, then agricultural area available for biomass-for-energy could increase to some 1000 Mha.

The discussions in this report – institutional, supply chain, and biomass-bioenergy potential – all find common themes that point towards needs for enhanced sectoral action. These include: increased bioenergy-industry professionalism, aligned and consistent forms of collective action, strategic efforts to markedly increase public and political acceptance, more synergistic alliances with incumbent industries, careful application of third-party assessment schemes, the building of resilient technology strategies, and the consistent sourcing of biomass via pathways that remain accepted (legitimate) in the eyes of critical stakeholders.

This analysis concludes that many of the constraints or ‘barriers’ being experienced by the sector can be anticipated by examination of ongoing events through management and policy assessment lenses. This in turn indicates that guidance is available for action, both in theory, and by building upon the documented experiences of other emerging sectors. However, it is also concluded that more evidence from the field is vital to enrich this work and the value it may offer the sector. The report closes with brief delineation of research work required to better document where, how and when the industry might act to more effectively – and legitimately – unlock the potential of bioenergy on a global scale. It also calls for dissemination of this report in global bioenergy networks as a seed for future work for the international bioenergy community. (Less)
Please use this url to cite or link to this publication:
author
organization
publishing date
type
Book/Report
publication status
published
subject
in
IIIEE Reports
volume
2011:02
pages
132 pages
publisher
International Institute for Industrial Environmental Economics, Lund University
ISSN
1650-1675
ISBN
978-91-88902-78-8
language
English
LU publication?
yes
id
721bdc24-d698-4a0f-8b88-0dfafb894b30 (old id 2369139)
date added to LUP
2012-03-05 16:09:45
date last changed
2016-04-15 21:07:01
@techreport{721bdc24-d698-4a0f-8b88-0dfafb894b30,
  abstract     = {This work is underlain by broad-based expectations that policy interventions such as EU 2020 goals for renewable energy will continue to drive increased international trade in biomass for energy. This work focuses on where and how large volumes of biomass for bioenergy may be brought to the market in the short to medium term and sought insights in the following areas:<br/><br>
• the manner in which demand for biofuels can be driven by political goals;<br/><br>
• the realism of expectations that biofuels can achieve political goals;<br/><br>
• the nature of production/consumption structures and potential in different regions;<br/><br>
• competence and resource needs for international bioenergy trade;<br/><br>
• the nature of synergies and competition with incumbent industries.<br/><br>
The work first examines immaturity and diversity in the bioenergy industry, and then presents and dissects policy cases to examine policy-making strengths and weaknesses. Management literature for emerging industrial sectors and policy literature are then used to support analysis of challenges posed by diversity in geographical, socio-economic conditions, and by energy carrier and supply chains differences. Arguments are then developed that a significant contribution to progress can be made by enhancing collective action; ‘standardisation’ of ‘bioenergy offerings’; building the profession and professionalism; by improved interplay with other industries and stakeholders, and by improved input to policy-making processes.<br/><br>
The report then presents quantifications for biomass resources potentially available in the near to medium term. These include residue flows from agriculture and forestry, and new dedicated agriculture-derived feedstock supply systems. Importantly, modelling supporting this analysis indicates that there is substantial scope for land-minimizing growth of world food supply. This is feasible through efficiency improvements in the food chains from existing land-in-use. Scenarios presented here indicate that it is feasible to reduce global agricultural requirements some 230 Mha from current levels while still meeting dietary requirements (mainstream FAO estimates indicate expansion by 280Mha). This provides significant scope for expansion of dedicated energy crops. If higher productivity is combined with dietary changes toward less land-demanding food, then agricultural area available for biomass-for-energy could increase to some 1000 Mha.<br/><br>
The discussions in this report – institutional, supply chain, and biomass-bioenergy potential – all find common themes that point towards needs for enhanced sectoral action. These include: increased bioenergy-industry professionalism, aligned and consistent forms of collective action, strategic efforts to markedly increase public and political acceptance, more synergistic alliances with incumbent industries, careful application of third-party assessment schemes, the building of resilient technology strategies, and the consistent sourcing of biomass via pathways that remain accepted (legitimate) in the eyes of critical stakeholders.<br/><br>
This analysis concludes that many of the constraints or ‘barriers’ being experienced by the sector can be anticipated by examination of ongoing events through management and policy assessment lenses. This in turn indicates that guidance is available for action, both in theory, and by building upon the documented experiences of other emerging sectors. However, it is also concluded that more evidence from the field is vital to enrich this work and the value it may offer the sector. The report closes with brief delineation of research work required to better document where, how and when the industry might act to more effectively – and legitimately – unlock the potential of bioenergy on a global scale. It also calls for dissemination of this report in global bioenergy networks as a seed for future work for the international bioenergy community.},
  author       = {Peck, Philip and Berndes, Göran and Hektor, Bo},
  institution  = {International Institute for Industrial Environmental Economics, Lund University},
  isbn         = {978-91-88902-78-8},
  issn         = {1650-1675},
  language     = {eng},
  pages        = {132},
  series       = {IIIEE Reports},
  title        = {Mobilising Global Bioenergy Supply Chains: Keys to unlocking the potential of bioenergy},
  volume       = {2011:02},
  year         = {2011},
}