Skip to main content

Lund University Publications

LUND UNIVERSITY LIBRARIES

Polarotactic tabanids find striped patterns with brightness and/or polarization modulation least attractive: an advantage of zebra stripes

Egri, Adam ; Blaho, Miklos ; Kriska, Gyoergy ; Farkas, Robert ; Gyurkovszky, Monika ; Åkesson, Susanne LU and Horvath, Gabor (2012) In Journal of Experimental Biology 215(5). p.736-745
Abstract
The characteristic striped appearance of zebras has provoked much speculation about its function and why the pattern has evolved, but experimental evidence is scarce. Here, we demonstrate that a zebra-striped horse model attracts far fewer horseflies (tabanids) than either homogeneous black, brown, grey or white equivalents. Such biting flies are prevalent across Africa and have considerable fitness impact on potential mammalian hosts. Besides brightness, one of the likely mechanisms underlying this protection is the polarization of reflected light from the host animal. We show that the attractiveness of striped patterns to tabanids is also reduced if only polarization modulations (parallel stripes with alternating orthogonal directions of... (More)
The characteristic striped appearance of zebras has provoked much speculation about its function and why the pattern has evolved, but experimental evidence is scarce. Here, we demonstrate that a zebra-striped horse model attracts far fewer horseflies (tabanids) than either homogeneous black, brown, grey or white equivalents. Such biting flies are prevalent across Africa and have considerable fitness impact on potential mammalian hosts. Besides brightness, one of the likely mechanisms underlying this protection is the polarization of reflected light from the host animal. We show that the attractiveness of striped patterns to tabanids is also reduced if only polarization modulations (parallel stripes with alternating orthogonal directions of polarization) occur in horizontal or vertical homogeneous grey surfaces. Tabanids have been shown to respond strongly to linearly polarized light, and we demonstrate here that the light and dark stripes of a zebra's coat reflect very different polarizations of light in a way that disrupts the attractiveness to tabanids. We show that the attractiveness to tabanids decreases with decreasing stripe width, and that stripes below a certain size are effective in not attracting tabanids. Further, we demonstrate that the stripe widths of zebra coats fall in a range where the striped pattern is most disruptive to tabanids. The striped coat patterns of several other large mammals may also function in reducing exposure to tabanids by similar mechanisms of differential brightness and polarization of reflected light. This work provides an experimentally supported explanation for the underlying mechanism leading to the selective advantage of a black-and-white striped coat pattern. (Less)
Please use this url to cite or link to this publication:
author
; ; ; ; ; and
organization
publishing date
type
Contribution to journal
publication status
published
subject
keywords
zebra, tabanid fly, horsefly, striped pattern, protection from, parasites, visual ecology, reflection polarization, polarization vision
in
Journal of Experimental Biology
volume
215
issue
5
pages
736 - 745
publisher
The Company of Biologists Ltd
external identifiers
  • wos:000300415400013
  • scopus:84857609819
  • pmid:22323196
ISSN
1477-9145
DOI
10.1242/jeb.065540
language
English
LU publication?
yes
id
b5138caf-befa-41ed-9e92-9d49444d8fe3 (old id 2403416)
date added to LUP
2016-04-01 10:40:34
date last changed
2022-04-28 00:16:45
@article{b5138caf-befa-41ed-9e92-9d49444d8fe3,
  abstract     = {{The characteristic striped appearance of zebras has provoked much speculation about its function and why the pattern has evolved, but experimental evidence is scarce. Here, we demonstrate that a zebra-striped horse model attracts far fewer horseflies (tabanids) than either homogeneous black, brown, grey or white equivalents. Such biting flies are prevalent across Africa and have considerable fitness impact on potential mammalian hosts. Besides brightness, one of the likely mechanisms underlying this protection is the polarization of reflected light from the host animal. We show that the attractiveness of striped patterns to tabanids is also reduced if only polarization modulations (parallel stripes with alternating orthogonal directions of polarization) occur in horizontal or vertical homogeneous grey surfaces. Tabanids have been shown to respond strongly to linearly polarized light, and we demonstrate here that the light and dark stripes of a zebra's coat reflect very different polarizations of light in a way that disrupts the attractiveness to tabanids. We show that the attractiveness to tabanids decreases with decreasing stripe width, and that stripes below a certain size are effective in not attracting tabanids. Further, we demonstrate that the stripe widths of zebra coats fall in a range where the striped pattern is most disruptive to tabanids. The striped coat patterns of several other large mammals may also function in reducing exposure to tabanids by similar mechanisms of differential brightness and polarization of reflected light. This work provides an experimentally supported explanation for the underlying mechanism leading to the selective advantage of a black-and-white striped coat pattern.}},
  author       = {{Egri, Adam and Blaho, Miklos and Kriska, Gyoergy and Farkas, Robert and Gyurkovszky, Monika and Åkesson, Susanne and Horvath, Gabor}},
  issn         = {{1477-9145}},
  keywords     = {{zebra; tabanid fly; horsefly; striped pattern; protection from; parasites; visual ecology; reflection polarization; polarization vision}},
  language     = {{eng}},
  number       = {{5}},
  pages        = {{736--745}},
  publisher    = {{The Company of Biologists Ltd}},
  series       = {{Journal of Experimental Biology}},
  title        = {{Polarotactic tabanids find striped patterns with brightness and/or polarization modulation least attractive: an advantage of zebra stripes}},
  url          = {{http://dx.doi.org/10.1242/jeb.065540}},
  doi          = {{10.1242/jeb.065540}},
  volume       = {{215}},
  year         = {{2012}},
}