Skip to main content

Lund University Publications

LUND UNIVERSITY LIBRARIES

Behavioural modes in butterflies : their implications for movement and searching behaviour

Evans, Luke Christopher ; Oliver, Tom Henry ; Sims, Ian ; Greenwell, Matthew Peter ; Melero, Yolanda ; Watson, Arron ; Townsend, Felix and Walters, Richard John LU (2020) In Animal Behaviour 169. p.23-33
Abstract

Animals move in ‘modes’ where movement patterns relate to specific behaviours. Despite much work on the movement of butterflies, their behavioural modes are relatively unexplored. Here we analysed the behaviour of the model butterfly species the meadow brown, Maniola jurtina. We identified modes in both sexes and across habitats varying in resource density. We found that, in nectar-rich habitats, males had more diverse behaviour than females, engaging in a unique ‘high-flight’ mode associated with mate search, whereas females were primarily nectaring or inactive. In nectar-poor habitats, both sexes were similar, switching between flight and inactivity. We also identified the movement parameters of the modes, finding that, for both... (More)

Animals move in ‘modes’ where movement patterns relate to specific behaviours. Despite much work on the movement of butterflies, their behavioural modes are relatively unexplored. Here we analysed the behaviour of the model butterfly species the meadow brown, Maniola jurtina. We identified modes in both sexes and across habitats varying in resource density. We found that, in nectar-rich habitats, males had more diverse behaviour than females, engaging in a unique ‘high-flight’ mode associated with mate search, whereas females were primarily nectaring or inactive. In nectar-poor habitats, both sexes were similar, switching between flight and inactivity. We also identified the movement parameters of the modes, finding that, for both sexes, movements associated with nectaring were slower and more tortuous and, for males, the mode associated with mate searching was straighter and faster. Using an individual-based random-walk model, we investigated the effects of behaviour on movement predictions by comparing a mode-switching model with a version including intraspecific variation and another assuming homogeneity between individuals. For both sexes, including modes affected the mean and shape of the displacement rate compared to models assuming homogeneity, although for females modes increased displacement 1.5 times while for males they decreased it by a third. Both models also differed substantially from models assuming intraspecific variation. Finally, using a new model of search behaviour we investigated the general conditions under which individuals should engage in an exclusive search for host plants or receptive females. Parameterized for M. jurtina, the model predicted males should engage exclusively in mate search, but females only when searching is very efficient. The model provides a framework for analysing the searching behaviour of other butterfly species.

(Less)
Please use this url to cite or link to this publication:
author
; ; ; ; ; ; and
organization
publishing date
type
Contribution to journal
publication status
published
subject
keywords
Maniola jurtina, meadow brown, motivation, movement
in
Animal Behaviour
volume
169
pages
11 pages
publisher
Elsevier
external identifiers
  • scopus:85091667869
ISSN
0003-3472
DOI
10.1016/j.anbehav.2020.09.001
language
English
LU publication?
yes
id
2416e25b-277d-4cdb-9019-05b6cfeb5bbc
date added to LUP
2020-10-23 12:30:42
date last changed
2022-04-19 01:21:31
@article{2416e25b-277d-4cdb-9019-05b6cfeb5bbc,
  abstract     = {{<p>Animals move in ‘modes’ where movement patterns relate to specific behaviours. Despite much work on the movement of butterflies, their behavioural modes are relatively unexplored. Here we analysed the behaviour of the model butterfly species the meadow brown, Maniola jurtina. We identified modes in both sexes and across habitats varying in resource density. We found that, in nectar-rich habitats, males had more diverse behaviour than females, engaging in a unique ‘high-flight’ mode associated with mate search, whereas females were primarily nectaring or inactive. In nectar-poor habitats, both sexes were similar, switching between flight and inactivity. We also identified the movement parameters of the modes, finding that, for both sexes, movements associated with nectaring were slower and more tortuous and, for males, the mode associated with mate searching was straighter and faster. Using an individual-based random-walk model, we investigated the effects of behaviour on movement predictions by comparing a mode-switching model with a version including intraspecific variation and another assuming homogeneity between individuals. For both sexes, including modes affected the mean and shape of the displacement rate compared to models assuming homogeneity, although for females modes increased displacement 1.5 times while for males they decreased it by a third. Both models also differed substantially from models assuming intraspecific variation. Finally, using a new model of search behaviour we investigated the general conditions under which individuals should engage in an exclusive search for host plants or receptive females. Parameterized for M. jurtina, the model predicted males should engage exclusively in mate search, but females only when searching is very efficient. The model provides a framework for analysing the searching behaviour of other butterfly species.</p>}},
  author       = {{Evans, Luke Christopher and Oliver, Tom Henry and Sims, Ian and Greenwell, Matthew Peter and Melero, Yolanda and Watson, Arron and Townsend, Felix and Walters, Richard John}},
  issn         = {{0003-3472}},
  keywords     = {{Maniola jurtina; meadow brown; motivation; movement}},
  language     = {{eng}},
  pages        = {{23--33}},
  publisher    = {{Elsevier}},
  series       = {{Animal Behaviour}},
  title        = {{Behavioural modes in butterflies : their implications for movement and searching behaviour}},
  url          = {{http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.anbehav.2020.09.001}},
  doi          = {{10.1016/j.anbehav.2020.09.001}},
  volume       = {{169}},
  year         = {{2020}},
}