Legalising environmental leadership: A comment on the CJEU's ruling in C-366/10 on the inclusion of aviation in the EU Emissions Trading Scheme
(2012) In Journal of Environmental Law 24(2). p.345-356- Abstract
- Abstract in Undetermined
This article examines the recent judgment in case C-366/10 in which the CJEU upheld the widened scope of the EU Emissions Trading Scheme, to include aviation, against a challenge by US airlines. At the core of this case stands the question of the extent to which, if at all, the EU is allowed to unilaterally control greenhouse gas emissions from aviation given that to date these are unregulated at an international level. As such, this is a case concerning the legitimacy of regional regulatory responses to global institutional failings. What the court does is to legitimise EU’s leading role in combating climate change, which has important implications not only with regard to EU’s climate change policy but also in... (More) - Abstract in Undetermined
This article examines the recent judgment in case C-366/10 in which the CJEU upheld the widened scope of the EU Emissions Trading Scheme, to include aviation, against a challenge by US airlines. At the core of this case stands the question of the extent to which, if at all, the EU is allowed to unilaterally control greenhouse gas emissions from aviation given that to date these are unregulated at an international level. As such, this is a case concerning the legitimacy of regional regulatory responses to global institutional failings. What the court does is to legitimise EU’s leading role in combating climate change, which has important implications not only with regard to EU’s climate change policy but also in shaping the global climate change regime. (Less)
Please use this url to cite or link to this publication:
https://lup.lub.lu.se/record/2543272
- author
- Bogojevic, Sanja LU
- organization
- publishing date
- 2012
- type
- Contribution to journal
- publication status
- published
- subject
- keywords
- miljörätt, EU-rätt, EU Law, environmental Law
- in
- Journal of Environmental Law
- volume
- 24
- issue
- 2
- pages
- 345 - 356
- publisher
- Oxford University Press
- external identifiers
-
- wos:000305825200006
- scopus:84864504046
- ISSN
- 1464-374X
- DOI
- 10.1093/jel/eqs013
- language
- English
- LU publication?
- yes
- id
- a5dfb6fe-6e19-4ec9-9c74-599eed5f89eb (old id 2543272)
- date added to LUP
- 2016-04-01 10:11:12
- date last changed
- 2023-03-08 09:51:46
@article{a5dfb6fe-6e19-4ec9-9c74-599eed5f89eb, abstract = {{Abstract in Undetermined<br/>This article examines the recent judgment in case C-366/10 in which the CJEU upheld the widened scope of the EU Emissions Trading Scheme, to include aviation, against a challenge by US airlines. At the core of this case stands the question of the extent to which, if at all, the EU is allowed to unilaterally control greenhouse gas emissions from aviation given that to date these are unregulated at an international level. As such, this is a case concerning the legitimacy of regional regulatory responses to global institutional failings. What the court does is to legitimise EU’s leading role in combating climate change, which has important implications not only with regard to EU’s climate change policy but also in shaping the global climate change regime.}}, author = {{Bogojevic, Sanja}}, issn = {{1464-374X}}, keywords = {{miljörätt; EU-rätt; EU Law; environmental Law}}, language = {{eng}}, number = {{2}}, pages = {{345--356}}, publisher = {{Oxford University Press}}, series = {{Journal of Environmental Law}}, title = {{Legalising environmental leadership: A comment on the CJEU's ruling in C-366/10 on the inclusion of aviation in the EU Emissions Trading Scheme}}, url = {{http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/jel/eqs013}}, doi = {{10.1093/jel/eqs013}}, volume = {{24}}, year = {{2012}}, }