Adoption, adaptation or chance? Inter-organisational diffusion of the protection of civilians norm from the UN to the African Union
(2022) In Third World Quarterly 43(10). p.2357-2374- Abstract
Norms can be adopted without modifications or adapted to regional contexts for strategic or principled reasons. Norm adoption and adaptation can also happen by chance. When adoption takes place without consideration of the norm’s effectiveness or appropriateness, we speak about imitation. When adaptation takes place in such a manner, we lack conceptual tools to analyse it. We propose a novel concept of incidental adaptation–divergence between promoted and adopted norms due to fortuitous events. This completes the typology of scenarios leading to norm adoption and adaptation. We apply the typology to the transmission of the protection of civilians norm in peace operations from the United Nations (UN) to the African Union (AU). The AU... (More)
Norms can be adopted without modifications or adapted to regional contexts for strategic or principled reasons. Norm adoption and adaptation can also happen by chance. When adoption takes place without consideration of the norm’s effectiveness or appropriateness, we speak about imitation. When adaptation takes place in such a manner, we lack conceptual tools to analyse it. We propose a novel concept of incidental adaptation–divergence between promoted and adopted norms due to fortuitous events. This completes the typology of scenarios leading to norm adoption and adaptation. We apply the typology to the transmission of the protection of civilians norm in peace operations from the United Nations (UN) to the African Union (AU). The AU adopted the UN’s approaches in pursuit of interoperability and resources, and out of recognition of the UN’s normative authority. It also happened incidentally when the AU temporarily followed the UN’s approaches. The AU engaged in adaptation to reflect the nature of its operations and normative orientations of AU member states. Incidental adaptation accounted for the presence of the rights-based tier in the AU’s protection of civilians concept. These findings nuance our understanding of norm diffusion, inter-organisational relations and the role of chance in international affairs.
(Less)
- author
- Oksamytna, Kseniya and Wilén, Nina LU
- organization
- publishing date
- 2022
- type
- Contribution to journal
- publication status
- published
- subject
- keywords
- African Union, inter-organisational, norm diffusion, peace operations, protection of civilians, United Nations
- in
- Third World Quarterly
- volume
- 43
- issue
- 10
- pages
- 18 pages
- publisher
- Taylor & Francis
- external identifiers
-
- scopus:85135267788
- ISSN
- 0143-6597
- DOI
- 10.1080/01436597.2022.2102474
- language
- English
- LU publication?
- yes
- id
- 258dad8f-60ce-4e8b-bf51-f6bb39aa1b8b
- date added to LUP
- 2022-09-09 12:28:24
- date last changed
- 2022-09-09 12:28:24
@article{258dad8f-60ce-4e8b-bf51-f6bb39aa1b8b,
abstract = {{<p>Norms can be adopted without modifications or adapted to regional contexts for strategic or principled reasons. Norm adoption and adaptation can also happen by chance. When adoption takes place without consideration of the norm’s effectiveness or appropriateness, we speak about imitation. When adaptation takes place in such a manner, we lack conceptual tools to analyse it. We propose a novel concept of incidental adaptation–divergence between promoted and adopted norms due to fortuitous events. This completes the typology of scenarios leading to norm adoption and adaptation. We apply the typology to the transmission of the protection of civilians norm in peace operations from the United Nations (UN) to the African Union (AU). The AU adopted the UN’s approaches in pursuit of interoperability and resources, and out of recognition of the UN’s normative authority. It also happened incidentally when the AU temporarily followed the UN’s approaches. The AU engaged in adaptation to reflect the nature of its operations and normative orientations of AU member states. Incidental adaptation accounted for the presence of the rights-based tier in the AU’s protection of civilians concept. These findings nuance our understanding of norm diffusion, inter-organisational relations and the role of chance in international affairs.</p>}},
author = {{Oksamytna, Kseniya and Wilén, Nina}},
issn = {{0143-6597}},
keywords = {{African Union; inter-organisational; norm diffusion; peace operations; protection of civilians; United Nations}},
language = {{eng}},
number = {{10}},
pages = {{2357--2374}},
publisher = {{Taylor & Francis}},
series = {{Third World Quarterly}},
title = {{Adoption, adaptation or chance? Inter-organisational diffusion of the protection of civilians norm from the UN to the African Union}},
url = {{http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/01436597.2022.2102474}},
doi = {{10.1080/01436597.2022.2102474}},
volume = {{43}},
year = {{2022}},
}