On the relationship between the Cartesian and the ontological way to the transcendental reduction in the phenomenological philosophy of Edmund Husserl
(2014) In Journal of Media, Cognition and Communication = Tidsskrift for Medier, Erkendelse og Formidling 2(1). p.37-52- Abstract
- This paper assesses a discussion on how to understand the relationship between Husserl’s Cartesian way and the later ontological way to the transcendental reduction: Is the Cartesian way flawed to the extent that the ontological way constitutes a principal correction to it, or is the ontological way a logical completion of an insufficient but nonetheless necessary Cartesian way? A reading with the purpose of rendering probable that this discussion allows for a third alternative is proposed in this paper. Such a reading claims that both ways are individually sufficient. The ontological way is thus taken to be a clarification of certain underemphasised though not principally missing elements of the Cartesian way.
Please use this url to cite or link to this publication:
https://lup.lub.lu.se/record/2758478e-6a7b-4054-aee1-f1b0c01b3256
- author
- Storgaard, Asbjørn LU
- publishing date
- 2014-11-06
- type
- Contribution to journal
- publication status
- published
- keywords
- Phenomenology, subjectivity, transcendental reduction
- in
- Journal of Media, Cognition and Communication = Tidsskrift for Medier, Erkendelse og Formidling
- volume
- 2
- issue
- 1
- article number
- 1
- pages
- 16 pages
- ISSN
- 2245-9855
- language
- English
- LU publication?
- no
- id
- 2758478e-6a7b-4054-aee1-f1b0c01b3256
- alternative location
- https://tidsskrift.dk/mef-journal/article/view/28652
- date added to LUP
- 2018-11-22 14:18:13
- date last changed
- 2018-11-22 15:56:37
@article{2758478e-6a7b-4054-aee1-f1b0c01b3256, abstract = {{This paper assesses a discussion on how to understand the relationship between Husserl’s Cartesian way and the later ontological way to the transcendental reduction: Is the Cartesian way flawed to the extent that the ontological way constitutes a principal correction to it, or is the ontological way a logical completion of an insufficient but nonetheless necessary Cartesian way? A reading with the purpose of rendering probable that this discussion allows for a third alternative is proposed in this paper. Such a reading claims that both ways are individually sufficient. The ontological way is thus taken to be a clarification of certain underemphasised though not principally missing elements of the Cartesian way.}}, author = {{Storgaard, Asbjørn}}, issn = {{2245-9855}}, keywords = {{Phenomenology; subjectivity; transcendental reduction}}, language = {{eng}}, month = {{11}}, number = {{1}}, pages = {{37--52}}, series = {{Journal of Media, Cognition and Communication = Tidsskrift for Medier, Erkendelse og Formidling}}, title = {{On the relationship between the Cartesian and the ontological way to the transcendental reduction in the phenomenological philosophy of Edmund Husserl}}, url = {{https://tidsskrift.dk/mef-journal/article/view/28652}}, volume = {{2}}, year = {{2014}}, }