Skip to main content

Lund University Publications

LUND UNIVERSITY LIBRARIES

Genomic history of early dogs in Europe

Bergström, Anders ; Rosengren, Erika LU orcid and Skoglund, Pontus (2026) In Nature 651(8107). p.986-994
Abstract
The earliest morphologically identifiable dogs are from Europe and date to at least 14,000 years ago1, 2, 3, 4–5, although early remains are also found in other regions. The origin of early dogs in Europe, and their relationships to other dogs, has remained elusive in the absence of genome-wide data. Similarly, although dogs were the only domestic animal to predate agriculture, little is known about how the arrival of Neolithic farmers from Southwest Asia affected the dogs living with European Mesolithic hunter-gatherers. Here we analysed 216 canid remains, including 181 from Palaeolithic and Mesolithic Europe. We developed a genome-wide capture approach that enriched endogenous DNA by 10–100-fold and could distinguish dog from wolf... (More)
The earliest morphologically identifiable dogs are from Europe and date to at least 14,000 years ago1, 2, 3, 4–5, although early remains are also found in other regions. The origin of early dogs in Europe, and their relationships to other dogs, has remained elusive in the absence of genome-wide data. Similarly, although dogs were the only domestic animal to predate agriculture, little is known about how the arrival of Neolithic farmers from Southwest Asia affected the dogs living with European Mesolithic hunter-gatherers. Here we analysed 216 canid remains, including 181 from Palaeolithic and Mesolithic Europe. We developed a genome-wide capture approach that enriched endogenous DNA by 10–100-fold and could distinguish dog from wolf ancestry for 141 of 216 remains. The oldest dog data that we recovered are from a 14,200-year-old dog from the Kesslerloch site in Switzerland, and we find that it shares ancestry with later worldwide dogs—inconsistent with the hypothesis that European Upper Palaeolithic dogs derived wholly from a separate domestication process. The Kesslerloch dog already displays more affinity to Mesolithic, Neolithic and present-day European dogs than to Asian dogs, demonstrating that dog genetic diversification had started well before 14,200 years ago. We find a Neolithic influx of Southwest Asian ancestry into Europe, but this seems to have been of smaller magnitude than in humans, suggesting that Mesolithic dogs contributed substantially to Neolithic, and, ultimately, probably also modern, European dogs. (Less)
Please use this url to cite or link to this publication:
author
; and
author collaboration
organization
publishing date
type
Contribution to journal
publication status
published
subject
keywords
Archaeology, Population genetics, Evolutionary biology, Evolutionary genetics, Genomics
in
Nature
volume
651
issue
8107
pages
9 pages
publisher
Nature Publishing Group
external identifiers
  • pmid:41882126
  • scopus:105034378760
ISSN
1476-4687
DOI
10.1038/s41586-026-10112-7
language
English
LU publication?
yes
id
28019230-25ad-464d-9f71-1d6502a04935
date added to LUP
2026-03-27 07:24:45
date last changed
2026-07-02 10:11:27
@article{28019230-25ad-464d-9f71-1d6502a04935,
  abstract     = {{The earliest morphologically identifiable dogs are from Europe and date to at least 14,000 years ago1, 2, 3, 4–5, although early remains are also found in other regions. The origin of early dogs in Europe, and their relationships to other dogs, has remained elusive in the absence of genome-wide data. Similarly, although dogs were the only domestic animal to predate agriculture, little is known about how the arrival of Neolithic farmers from Southwest Asia affected the dogs living with European Mesolithic hunter-gatherers. Here we analysed 216 canid remains, including 181 from Palaeolithic and Mesolithic Europe. We developed a genome-wide capture approach that enriched endogenous DNA by 10–100-fold and could distinguish dog from wolf ancestry for 141 of 216 remains. The oldest dog data that we recovered are from a 14,200-year-old dog from the Kesslerloch site in Switzerland, and we find that it shares ancestry with later worldwide dogs—inconsistent with the hypothesis that European Upper Palaeolithic dogs derived wholly from a separate domestication process. The Kesslerloch dog already displays more affinity to Mesolithic, Neolithic and present-day European dogs than to Asian dogs, demonstrating that dog genetic diversification had started well before 14,200 years ago. We find a Neolithic influx of Southwest Asian ancestry into Europe, but this seems to have been of smaller magnitude than in humans, suggesting that Mesolithic dogs contributed substantially to Neolithic, and, ultimately, probably also modern, European dogs.}},
  author       = {{Bergström, Anders and Rosengren, Erika and Skoglund, Pontus}},
  issn         = {{1476-4687}},
  keywords     = {{Archaeology; Population genetics; Evolutionary biology; Evolutionary genetics; Genomics}},
  language     = {{eng}},
  month        = {{03}},
  number       = {{8107}},
  pages        = {{986--994}},
  publisher    = {{Nature Publishing Group}},
  series       = {{Nature}},
  title        = {{Genomic history of early dogs in Europe}},
  url          = {{http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41586-026-10112-7}},
  doi          = {{10.1038/s41586-026-10112-7}},
  volume       = {{651}},
  year         = {{2026}},
}