Development of a Framework Identifying Domains and Elements of Importance for Arthritis Rehabilitation
(2012) In Journal of Rehabilitation Medicine 44(5). p.406-413- Abstract
- Background: Rehabilitation is effective and beneficial for patients with arthritis. The lack of a common structure for describing the content of rehabilitation makes it difficult to compare, transfer and implement research evidence into clinical practice. Objective: To develop a framework comprising domains and elements of importance when describing arthritis rehabilitation. Methods: On the basis of a systematic literature search and review, the framework was developed through a 9-step development process, including 5 Delphi consensus rounds within the Scandinavian Team Arthritis Register - European Team Initiative for Care Research (STAR-ETIC) collaboration, a group of clinicians, researchers and patients from northern Europe. Results:... (More)
- Background: Rehabilitation is effective and beneficial for patients with arthritis. The lack of a common structure for describing the content of rehabilitation makes it difficult to compare, transfer and implement research evidence into clinical practice. Objective: To develop a framework comprising domains and elements of importance when describing arthritis rehabilitation. Methods: On the basis of a systematic literature search and review, the framework was developed through a 9-step development process, including 5 Delphi consensus rounds within the Scandinavian Team Arthritis Register - European Team Initiative for Care Research (STAR-ETIC) collaboration, a group of clinicians, researchers and patients from northern Europe. Results: Based on Donabedian's healthcare model, the International Classification of Function, Disability and Health, and a rehabilitation model by D. T. Wade, 4 domains (context, structure, process and outcome) were defined. Within each domain, the most important and relevant key elements for describing rehabilitation were selected. This framework contains 1 key element under context, 9 under structure, 3 under process, and 9 under outcome. Conclusion: The STAR-ETIC framework can be used to describe arthritis rehabilitation, by emphasizing key elements in 4 main domains. A common framework may facilitate comparisons of rehabilitation programmes across countries and different levels of care, and may improve the implementation of rehabilitation research in clinical practice. (Less)
Please use this url to cite or link to this publication:
https://lup.lub.lu.se/record/2895652
- author
- Klokkerud, Mari ; Hagen, Kare Birger ; Kjeken, Ingvild ; Bremander, Ann LU ; Horslev-Petersen, Kim ; Vlieland, Thea Vliet and Grotle, Margreth
- organization
- publishing date
- 2012
- type
- Contribution to journal
- publication status
- published
- subject
- keywords
- arthritis, rehabilitation, framework, context, structure, process, outcome
- in
- Journal of Rehabilitation Medicine
- volume
- 44
- issue
- 5
- pages
- 406 - 413
- publisher
- Taylor & Francis
- external identifiers
-
- wos:000305112300003
- scopus:84861091984
- pmid:22549648
- ISSN
- 1651-2081
- DOI
- 10.2340/16501977-0961
- language
- English
- LU publication?
- yes
- id
- 54e5eb33-2eff-4c0b-b284-added46b5ca6 (old id 2895652)
- date added to LUP
- 2016-04-01 13:51:41
- date last changed
- 2022-01-27 21:32:41
@article{54e5eb33-2eff-4c0b-b284-added46b5ca6, abstract = {{Background: Rehabilitation is effective and beneficial for patients with arthritis. The lack of a common structure for describing the content of rehabilitation makes it difficult to compare, transfer and implement research evidence into clinical practice. Objective: To develop a framework comprising domains and elements of importance when describing arthritis rehabilitation. Methods: On the basis of a systematic literature search and review, the framework was developed through a 9-step development process, including 5 Delphi consensus rounds within the Scandinavian Team Arthritis Register - European Team Initiative for Care Research (STAR-ETIC) collaboration, a group of clinicians, researchers and patients from northern Europe. Results: Based on Donabedian's healthcare model, the International Classification of Function, Disability and Health, and a rehabilitation model by D. T. Wade, 4 domains (context, structure, process and outcome) were defined. Within each domain, the most important and relevant key elements for describing rehabilitation were selected. This framework contains 1 key element under context, 9 under structure, 3 under process, and 9 under outcome. Conclusion: The STAR-ETIC framework can be used to describe arthritis rehabilitation, by emphasizing key elements in 4 main domains. A common framework may facilitate comparisons of rehabilitation programmes across countries and different levels of care, and may improve the implementation of rehabilitation research in clinical practice.}}, author = {{Klokkerud, Mari and Hagen, Kare Birger and Kjeken, Ingvild and Bremander, Ann and Horslev-Petersen, Kim and Vlieland, Thea Vliet and Grotle, Margreth}}, issn = {{1651-2081}}, keywords = {{arthritis; rehabilitation; framework; context; structure; process; outcome}}, language = {{eng}}, number = {{5}}, pages = {{406--413}}, publisher = {{Taylor & Francis}}, series = {{Journal of Rehabilitation Medicine}}, title = {{Development of a Framework Identifying Domains and Elements of Importance for Arthritis Rehabilitation}}, url = {{https://lup.lub.lu.se/search/files/3628804/3558890.pdf}}, doi = {{10.2340/16501977-0961}}, volume = {{44}}, year = {{2012}}, }