Advanced

Physiological Engineering of Xylose Utilisation by Recombinant Saccharomyces cerevisiae

Quednau Meinander, Nina LU (1997)
Abstract
Xylitol production by recombinant, <i>XYL1</i>-expressing <i>Saccharomyces cerevisiae</i> was investigated in fed-batch fermentation using different cosubstrates for growth, and generation of reduced cofactors and maintenance energy. Xylose was converted into xylitol with 1:1 yield. Using ethanol as cosubstrate, the yield of xylitol on ethanol and the specific xylitol productivity decreased with increasing aeration, whereas with decreasing aeration acetic acid accumulated, causing cell death. An increase in pH from 4.5 to 6.5 removed the toxic effect of 10 g l-1 acetic acid, and a xylitol yield on ethanol, specific productivity and volumetric productivity of 2.4 g g-1, 0.07 g g-1 h-1 and 1.0 g l-1 h-1, respectively,... (More)
Xylitol production by recombinant, <i>XYL1</i>-expressing <i>Saccharomyces cerevisiae</i> was investigated in fed-batch fermentation using different cosubstrates for growth, and generation of reduced cofactors and maintenance energy. Xylose was converted into xylitol with 1:1 yield. Using ethanol as cosubstrate, the yield of xylitol on ethanol and the specific xylitol productivity decreased with increasing aeration, whereas with decreasing aeration acetic acid accumulated, causing cell death. An increase in pH from 4.5 to 6.5 removed the toxic effect of 10 g l-1 acetic acid, and a xylitol yield on ethanol, specific productivity and volumetric productivity of 2.4 g g-1, 0.07 g g-1 h-1 and 1.0 g l-1 h-1, respectively, were obtained under oxygen-limited conditions in a rich medium. Using glucose as cosubstrate enabled anaerobic xylitol production, but the glucose feed rate required careful control because glucose accumulation inhibited xylose conversion. In a mineral medium the xylitol yield on glucose, specific productivity and volumetric productivity were 1.2 g g-1, 0.19 g g-1 h-1 and 0.42 g l-1 h-1, respectively. Among fermentable sugars, galactose was the most efficient cosubstrate, yielding 6.1 g xylitol g-1 galactose in fed-batch fermentation. In continuous xylitol production with immobilised cells in a packed-bed reactor using glucose as cosubstrate, the xylitol yield on glucose, specific productivity and volumetric productivity were 0.44 g g-1, 0.10 g g-1 h-1 and 5.6 g l-1 h-1, respectively.



The uptake of xylose, XR activity or supply rate of reduced cofactors control the rate of xylose conversion to xylitol. The uptake of xylose was not rate-limiting under cosubstrate-limited conditions, but many cosubstrates inhibited xylose conversion when present in high concentration, due to competitive and non-competitive inhibition of transport, rendering the transport step rate-controlling. The XR activity had very low control over the xylose conversion rate, as a 20-fold increase in specific activity increased the specific xylitol productivity less than 2-fold. In glucose-limited chemostat cultivation, xylose conversion affected the redox balance, as indicated by an increase in acetate yield and pentose phosphate pathway activity, and a decrease in glycerol yield. A 2-fold increase in glucose flux was accompanied by a 1.3-fold increase in xylose conversion rate, indicating that the supply rate of reduced cofactors was a rate-controlling factor.



In a <i>XYL1</i>- and <i>XYL2</i>-expressing strain, ten-fold overexpression of transaldolase enhanced growth but not ethanol production in anaerobic batch fermentations of xylose/glucose mixtures. Simultaneous glucose metabolism enhanced the xylose conversion rate and decreased xylitol excretion compared with xylose metabolism alone, but did not enhance ethanol production.



In the recombinant strains, high expression levels of plasmid-encoded genes led to high protein burden and marked growth disadvantage compared with revertants, which caused a rapid decline in recombinant enzyme activity during chemostat cultivation in a selective medium. The excretion of amino acids into the medium, destroying its selectivity, structural rearrangements within the plasmid and the effect of cultivation conditions on the regulation of the expression promoters contributed to the instability. (Less)
Please use this url to cite or link to this publication:
author
opponent
  • Dr Pronk, Jack T., Delft University of Technology, The Netherlands
organization
publishing date
type
Thesis
publication status
published
subject
keywords
protein burden, physiology, fed-batch fermentation, chemostat, recombinant Saccharomyces cerevisiae, ethanol, xylose, xylitol, Microbiology, bacteriology, virology, mycology, Mikrobiologi, bakteriologi, virologi, mykologi
pages
114 pages
publisher
Applied Microbiology (LTH)
defense location
Centre of Chemistry, Sölvegatan 39, Lund, lecture hall C
defense date
1997-05-02 10:15
external identifiers
  • other:ISRN: LUTKDH/(TKMB-1024)/114(1997)
language
English
LU publication?
yes
id
7a21f9e1-6a54-42fa-86df-289909e443b3 (old id 29232)
date added to LUP
2007-06-14 15:42:07
date last changed
2016-09-19 08:45:14
@phdthesis{7a21f9e1-6a54-42fa-86df-289909e443b3,
  abstract     = {Xylitol production by recombinant, &lt;i&gt;XYL1&lt;/i&gt;-expressing &lt;i&gt;Saccharomyces cerevisiae&lt;/i&gt; was investigated in fed-batch fermentation using different cosubstrates for growth, and generation of reduced cofactors and maintenance energy. Xylose was converted into xylitol with 1:1 yield. Using ethanol as cosubstrate, the yield of xylitol on ethanol and the specific xylitol productivity decreased with increasing aeration, whereas with decreasing aeration acetic acid accumulated, causing cell death. An increase in pH from 4.5 to 6.5 removed the toxic effect of 10 g l-1 acetic acid, and a xylitol yield on ethanol, specific productivity and volumetric productivity of 2.4 g g-1, 0.07 g g-1 h-1 and 1.0 g l-1 h-1, respectively, were obtained under oxygen-limited conditions in a rich medium. Using glucose as cosubstrate enabled anaerobic xylitol production, but the glucose feed rate required careful control because glucose accumulation inhibited xylose conversion. In a mineral medium the xylitol yield on glucose, specific productivity and volumetric productivity were 1.2 g g-1, 0.19 g g-1 h-1 and 0.42 g l-1 h-1, respectively. Among fermentable sugars, galactose was the most efficient cosubstrate, yielding 6.1 g xylitol g-1 galactose in fed-batch fermentation. In continuous xylitol production with immobilised cells in a packed-bed reactor using glucose as cosubstrate, the xylitol yield on glucose, specific productivity and volumetric productivity were 0.44 g g-1, 0.10 g g-1 h-1 and 5.6 g l-1 h-1, respectively.<br/><br>
<br/><br>
The uptake of xylose, XR activity or supply rate of reduced cofactors control the rate of xylose conversion to xylitol. The uptake of xylose was not rate-limiting under cosubstrate-limited conditions, but many cosubstrates inhibited xylose conversion when present in high concentration, due to competitive and non-competitive inhibition of transport, rendering the transport step rate-controlling. The XR activity had very low control over the xylose conversion rate, as a 20-fold increase in specific activity increased the specific xylitol productivity less than 2-fold. In glucose-limited chemostat cultivation, xylose conversion affected the redox balance, as indicated by an increase in acetate yield and pentose phosphate pathway activity, and a decrease in glycerol yield. A 2-fold increase in glucose flux was accompanied by a 1.3-fold increase in xylose conversion rate, indicating that the supply rate of reduced cofactors was a rate-controlling factor.<br/><br>
<br/><br>
In a &lt;i&gt;XYL1&lt;/i&gt;- and &lt;i&gt;XYL2&lt;/i&gt;-expressing strain, ten-fold overexpression of transaldolase enhanced growth but not ethanol production in anaerobic batch fermentations of xylose/glucose mixtures. Simultaneous glucose metabolism enhanced the xylose conversion rate and decreased xylitol excretion compared with xylose metabolism alone, but did not enhance ethanol production.<br/><br>
<br/><br>
In the recombinant strains, high expression levels of plasmid-encoded genes led to high protein burden and marked growth disadvantage compared with revertants, which caused a rapid decline in recombinant enzyme activity during chemostat cultivation in a selective medium. The excretion of amino acids into the medium, destroying its selectivity, structural rearrangements within the plasmid and the effect of cultivation conditions on the regulation of the expression promoters contributed to the instability.},
  author       = {Quednau Meinander, Nina},
  keyword      = {protein burden,physiology,fed-batch fermentation,chemostat,recombinant Saccharomyces cerevisiae,ethanol,xylose,xylitol,Microbiology,bacteriology,virology,mycology,Mikrobiologi,bakteriologi,virologi,mykologi},
  language     = {eng},
  pages        = {114},
  publisher    = {Applied Microbiology (LTH)},
  school       = {Lund University},
  title        = {Physiological Engineering of Xylose Utilisation by Recombinant <i>Saccharomyces cerevisiae</i>},
  year         = {1997},
}