Skip to main content

Lund University Publications

LUND UNIVERSITY LIBRARIES

A systematic review and meta-analysis of real-world data predictors for conversion to progressive multiple sclerosis

Solís-Tarazona, Luis Rafael ; Molina-Castaño, Maria ; Barea-Moya, Lucas ; Galan, Joana ; Raket, Lars Lau LU orcid and Gil-Perotin, Sara (2025) In Multiple Sclerosis and Related Disorders 103.
Abstract

Background: Available fluid biomarkers, neuroimaging techniques, and clinical assessments may enhance prediction of conversion to secondary progressive multiple sclerosis (SPMS). Objectives: : To identify robust real-world predictors of MS progression in the literature. Methods: : A systematic review was conducted in EMBASE. A total of 20,338 MS patients from 64 eligible studies were included. A p-value meta-analysis and a tipping point analysis were performed to assess associations with MS progression and EDSS. Results: Among CSF biomarkers, GFAP (p = 6.2 × 10⁻¹⁰) and CHI3L1 (p = 1.7 × 10⁻¹¹) demonstrated consistent aggregated associations with disease progression. In serum, NfL (p = 2.5 × 10⁻13) and GFAP (p = 1.4 ×... (More)

Background: Available fluid biomarkers, neuroimaging techniques, and clinical assessments may enhance prediction of conversion to secondary progressive multiple sclerosis (SPMS). Objectives: : To identify robust real-world predictors of MS progression in the literature. Methods: : A systematic review was conducted in EMBASE. A total of 20,338 MS patients from 64 eligible studies were included. A p-value meta-analysis and a tipping point analysis were performed to assess associations with MS progression and EDSS. Results: Among CSF biomarkers, GFAP (p = 6.2 × 10⁻¹⁰) and CHI3L1 (p = 1.7 × 10⁻¹¹) demonstrated consistent aggregated associations with disease progression. In serum, NfL (p = 2.5 × 10⁻13) and GFAP (p = 1.4 × 10-8) showed strong association with concurrent EDSS and disease progression. Spinal cord lesions (p = 9.4 × 10⁻¹¹) and iron rim lesions (p = 4 × 10⁻⁶) were the strongest radiological predictors. Among clinical assessment tools, significant associations were found with concurrent EDSS, but prediction of progression was limited. Conclusion: Fluid biomarkers, particularly CSF GFAP, CHI3L1, and serum NfL, along with spinal cord lesions and iron rim lesions on MRI, provide consistent evidence for predicting MS progression. There is a need for harmonized and accessible outcome measures in real-world datasets.

(Less)
Please use this url to cite or link to this publication:
author
; ; ; ; and
organization
publishing date
type
Contribution to journal
publication status
published
subject
keywords
Accessibility, Biomarkers, Cerebrospinal fluid, Expanded Disability Status Scale, Multiple Sclerosis, Neuroimaging, Progression
in
Multiple Sclerosis and Related Disorders
volume
103
article number
106674
publisher
Elsevier
external identifiers
  • pmid:40840332
  • scopus:105013649878
ISSN
2211-0348
DOI
10.1016/j.msard.2025.106674
language
English
LU publication?
yes
id
2a89e894-afcd-4539-8129-f92ba14fbe2c
date added to LUP
2025-10-09 12:21:58
date last changed
2025-10-10 03:00:07
@article{2a89e894-afcd-4539-8129-f92ba14fbe2c,
  abstract     = {{<p>Background: Available fluid biomarkers, neuroimaging techniques, and clinical assessments may enhance prediction of conversion to secondary progressive multiple sclerosis (SPMS). Objectives: : To identify robust real-world predictors of MS progression in the literature. Methods: : A systematic review was conducted in EMBASE. A total of 20,338 MS patients from 64 eligible studies were included. A p-value meta-analysis and a tipping point analysis were performed to assess associations with MS progression and EDSS. Results: Among CSF biomarkers, GFAP (p = 6.2 × 10⁻¹⁰) and CHI3L1 (p = 1.7 × 10⁻¹¹) demonstrated consistent aggregated associations with disease progression. In serum, NfL (p = 2.5 × 10⁻<sup>13</sup>) and GFAP (p = 1.4 × 10<sup>-8</sup>) showed strong association with concurrent EDSS and disease progression. Spinal cord lesions (p = 9.4 × 10⁻¹¹) and iron rim lesions (p = 4 × 10⁻⁶) were the strongest radiological predictors. Among clinical assessment tools, significant associations were found with concurrent EDSS, but prediction of progression was limited. Conclusion: Fluid biomarkers, particularly CSF GFAP, CHI3L1, and serum NfL, along with spinal cord lesions and iron rim lesions on MRI, provide consistent evidence for predicting MS progression. There is a need for harmonized and accessible outcome measures in real-world datasets.</p>}},
  author       = {{Solís-Tarazona, Luis Rafael and Molina-Castaño, Maria and Barea-Moya, Lucas and Galan, Joana and Raket, Lars Lau and Gil-Perotin, Sara}},
  issn         = {{2211-0348}},
  keywords     = {{Accessibility; Biomarkers; Cerebrospinal fluid; Expanded Disability Status Scale; Multiple Sclerosis; Neuroimaging; Progression}},
  language     = {{eng}},
  publisher    = {{Elsevier}},
  series       = {{Multiple Sclerosis and Related Disorders}},
  title        = {{A systematic review and meta-analysis of real-world data predictors for conversion to progressive multiple sclerosis}},
  url          = {{http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.msard.2025.106674}},
  doi          = {{10.1016/j.msard.2025.106674}},
  volume       = {{103}},
  year         = {{2025}},
}