Advanced

Round Robin av ett byggprocessärende : En studie av remissvar från räddningstjänsten

Johansson, Nils LU (2019) In TVBB
Abstract (Swedish)
It is considered unavoidable that there is some variation in how different fire services assess matters in the building process. However, it is unclear how great this variation is. A large variation can be problematic because it can result in that different municipalities make different demands on similar projects. The purpose of this work is to investigate how large this variation can be with a Round Robin study. In the Round Robin study, reviewers from different fire services reviewed the same case. Based on the Round Robin study, it was seen that different fire services have different focus in their review. Some participants had only comments on formalities while others had extensive comments that probably would require large changes in... (More)
It is considered unavoidable that there is some variation in how different fire services assess matters in the building process. However, it is unclear how great this variation is. A large variation can be problematic because it can result in that different municipalities make different demands on similar projects. The purpose of this work is to investigate how large this variation can be with a Round Robin study. In the Round Robin study, reviewers from different fire services reviewed the same case. Based on the Round Robin study, it was seen that different fire services have different focus in their review. Some participants had only comments on formalities while others had extensive comments that probably would require large changes in the design. This type of variation can result in different fire safety levels and costs for fire protection in different municipalities. (Less)
Please use this url to cite or link to this publication:
author
organization
publishing date
type
Book/Report
publication status
published
subject
in
TVBB
issue
3227
pages
41 pages
publisher
Lund University
ISSN
1402-3504
language
Swedish
LU publication?
yes
id
2c1aa365-2803-4973-836c-c706ce82cf01
date added to LUP
2019-05-21 10:51:31
date last changed
2019-06-07 09:17:02
@techreport{2c1aa365-2803-4973-836c-c706ce82cf01,
  abstract     = {It is considered unavoidable that there is some variation in how different fire services assess matters in the building process. However, it is unclear how great this variation is. A large variation can be problematic because it can result in that different municipalities make different demands on similar projects. The purpose of this work is to investigate how large this variation can be with a Round Robin study. In the Round Robin study, reviewers from different fire services reviewed the same case. Based on the Round Robin study, it was seen that different fire services have different focus in their review. Some participants had only comments on formalities while others had extensive comments that probably would require large changes in the design. This type of variation can result in different fire safety levels and costs for fire protection in different municipalities.},
  author       = {Johansson, Nils},
  institution  = {Lund University},
  issn         = {1402-3504},
  language     = {swe},
  month        = {05},
  number       = {3227},
  pages        = {41},
  series       = {TVBB},
  title        = {Round Robin av ett byggprocessärende : En studie av remissvar från räddningstjänsten},
  year         = {2019},
}