RIFM fragrance ingredient safety assessment, 2-decanone, CAS Registry Number 693-54-9
(2020) In Food and Chemical Toxicology 146.- Abstract
The existing information supports the use of this material as described in this safety assessment. 2-Decanone was evaluated for genotoxicity, repeated dose toxicity, reproductive toxicity, local respiratory toxicity, phototoxicity/photoallergenicity, skin sensitization, and environmental safety. Data from read-across analog 2-heptanone (CAS # 110-43-0) show that 2-decanone is not expected to be genotoxic. Data on read-across analog 2-heptanone (CAS # 110-43-0) provide a calculated margin of exposure (MOE) > 100 for the repeated dose toxicity and reproductive toxicity endpoints. The skin sensitization endpoint was completed using the dermal sensitization threshold (DST) for non-reactive materials (900 μg/cm2); exposure is... (More)
The existing information supports the use of this material as described in this safety assessment. 2-Decanone was evaluated for genotoxicity, repeated dose toxicity, reproductive toxicity, local respiratory toxicity, phototoxicity/photoallergenicity, skin sensitization, and environmental safety. Data from read-across analog 2-heptanone (CAS # 110-43-0) show that 2-decanone is not expected to be genotoxic. Data on read-across analog 2-heptanone (CAS # 110-43-0) provide a calculated margin of exposure (MOE) > 100 for the repeated dose toxicity and reproductive toxicity endpoints. The skin sensitization endpoint was completed using the dermal sensitization threshold (DST) for non-reactive materials (900 μg/cm2); exposure is below the DST. The phototoxicity/photoallergenicity endpoints were evaluated based on ultraviolet (UV) spectra; 2-decanone is not expected to be phototoxic/photoallergenic. For the local respiratory endpoint, a calculated MOE >100 was provided by the read-across analog 4-methyl-2-pentanone (CAS # 108-10-1). The environmental endpoints were evaluated; for the hazard assessment based on the screening data, 2-decanone is not persistent, bioaccumulative, and toxic (PBT) as per the International Fragrance Association (IFRA) Environmental Standards. For the risk assessment, 2-decanone was not able to be risk screened as there were no reported volumes of use for either North America or Europe in the 2015 IFRA Survey.
(Less)
- author
- publishing date
- 2020-09-12
- type
- Contribution to journal
- publication status
- published
- subject
- in
- Food and Chemical Toxicology
- volume
- 146
- article number
- 111735
- publisher
- Elsevier
- external identifiers
-
- pmid:32926935
- scopus:85091209683
- ISSN
- 0278-6915
- DOI
- 10.1016/j.fct.2020.111735
- language
- English
- LU publication?
- no
- id
- 2f3d0db0-d87c-4289-b298-beb26f6acb41
- date added to LUP
- 2020-11-02 11:17:06
- date last changed
- 2024-04-17 19:07:53
@article{2f3d0db0-d87c-4289-b298-beb26f6acb41, abstract = {{<p>The existing information supports the use of this material as described in this safety assessment. 2-Decanone was evaluated for genotoxicity, repeated dose toxicity, reproductive toxicity, local respiratory toxicity, phototoxicity/photoallergenicity, skin sensitization, and environmental safety. Data from read-across analog 2-heptanone (CAS # 110-43-0) show that 2-decanone is not expected to be genotoxic. Data on read-across analog 2-heptanone (CAS # 110-43-0) provide a calculated margin of exposure (MOE) > 100 for the repeated dose toxicity and reproductive toxicity endpoints. The skin sensitization endpoint was completed using the dermal sensitization threshold (DST) for non-reactive materials (900 μg/cm<sup>2</sup>); exposure is below the DST. The phototoxicity/photoallergenicity endpoints were evaluated based on ultraviolet (UV) spectra; 2-decanone is not expected to be phototoxic/photoallergenic. For the local respiratory endpoint, a calculated MOE >100 was provided by the read-across analog 4-methyl-2-pentanone (CAS # 108-10-1). The environmental endpoints were evaluated; for the hazard assessment based on the screening data, 2-decanone is not persistent, bioaccumulative, and toxic (PBT) as per the International Fragrance Association (IFRA) Environmental Standards. For the risk assessment, 2-decanone was not able to be risk screened as there were no reported volumes of use for either North America or Europe in the 2015 IFRA Survey.</p>}}, author = {{Api, A. M. and Belsito, D. and Biserta, S. and Botelho, D. and Bruze, M. and Burton, G. A. and Buschmann, J. and Cancellieri, M. A. and Dagli, M. L. and Date, M. and Dekant, W. and Deodhar, C. and Fryer, A. D. and Gadhia, S. and Jones, L. and Joshi, K. and Lapczynski, A. and Lavelle, M. and Liebler, D. C. and Na, M. and O'Brien, D. and Patel, A. and Penning, T. M. and Ritacco, G. and Rodriguez-Ropero, F. and Romine, J. and Sadekar, N. and Salvito, D. and Schultz, T. W. and Siddiqi, F. and Sipes, I. G. and Sullivan, G. and Thakkar, Y. and Tokura, Y. and Tsang, S.}}, issn = {{0278-6915}}, language = {{eng}}, month = {{09}}, publisher = {{Elsevier}}, series = {{Food and Chemical Toxicology}}, title = {{RIFM fragrance ingredient safety assessment, 2-decanone, CAS Registry Number 693-54-9}}, url = {{http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.fct.2020.111735}}, doi = {{10.1016/j.fct.2020.111735}}, volume = {{146}}, year = {{2020}}, }