Skip to main content

Lund University Publications

LUND UNIVERSITY LIBRARIES

Historical perspectives on forestry science and monocultures : Ideas of rationality in Sweden during the early twentieth century

Jönsson, Jimmy LU orcid (2024) In Ambio: a Journal of Environment and Society 53(6). p.933-940
Abstract
This study aims to broaden our historical knowledge about ideas of rationalism and monocultures in forestry science and rational forest management. Empirically, it focuses on the writings of Swedish forestry scientist Henrik Hesselman, active in the early twentieth century. The texts were analyzed using the method of historical contextualization. The study indicates that monocultures historically have been subjected to debates richer than what previous research gives credit for. Besides a rationalist technology, monocultures have been conceptualized as an example of non-rational forestry failing to deliver sustainable yields. Moreover, instead of only simplifications, one-size-fits-all solutions, and top-down reforms, historical forestry... (More)
This study aims to broaden our historical knowledge about ideas of rationalism and monocultures in forestry science and rational forest management. Empirically, it focuses on the writings of Swedish forestry scientist Henrik Hesselman, active in the early twentieth century. The texts were analyzed using the method of historical contextualization. The study indicates that monocultures historically have been subjected to debates richer than what previous research gives credit for. Besides a rationalist technology, monocultures have been conceptualized as an example of non-rational forestry failing to deliver sustainable yields. Moreover, instead of only simplifications, one-size-fits-all solutions, and top-down reforms, historical forestry science representatives have also at times understood rational forest management as a quest for complexity, site-specific solutions, and bottom-up approaches. It is argued that our understanding of forest use and society–environment relations, more generally, benefit from more historical contextualization. (Less)
Please use this url to cite or link to this publication:
author
organization
publishing date
type
Contribution to journal
publication status
published
subject
keywords
Environmental history, Forestry, History of ideas, Mixed forests, Monocultures, Sustainable yields
in
Ambio: a Journal of Environment and Society
volume
53
issue
6
pages
933 - 940
publisher
Springer Science and Business Media B.V.
external identifiers
  • pmid:38416298
  • scopus:85186237372
ISSN
0044-7447
DOI
10.1007/s13280-024-01987-9
project
Monokulturens kulturhistoria: Det svenska skogsbruket som fallstudie
language
English
LU publication?
yes
id
302e8ae3-424f-43c1-a815-1dba3835c51c
date added to LUP
2024-03-11 16:18:22
date last changed
2025-04-04 15:28:12
@article{302e8ae3-424f-43c1-a815-1dba3835c51c,
  abstract     = {{This study aims to broaden our historical knowledge about ideas of rationalism and monocultures in forestry science and rational forest management. Empirically, it focuses on the writings of Swedish forestry scientist Henrik Hesselman, active in the early twentieth century. The texts were analyzed using the method of historical contextualization. The study indicates that monocultures historically have been subjected to debates richer than what previous research gives credit for. Besides a rationalist technology, monocultures have been conceptualized as an example of non-rational forestry failing to deliver sustainable yields. Moreover, instead of only simplifications, one-size-fits-all solutions, and top-down reforms, historical forestry science representatives have also at times understood rational forest management as a quest for complexity, site-specific solutions, and bottom-up approaches. It is argued that our understanding of forest use and society–environment relations, more generally, benefit from more historical contextualization.}},
  author       = {{Jönsson, Jimmy}},
  issn         = {{0044-7447}},
  keywords     = {{Environmental history; Forestry; History of ideas; Mixed forests; Monocultures; Sustainable yields}},
  language     = {{eng}},
  number       = {{6}},
  pages        = {{933--940}},
  publisher    = {{Springer Science and Business Media B.V.}},
  series       = {{Ambio: a Journal of Environment and Society}},
  title        = {{Historical perspectives on forestry science and monocultures : Ideas of rationality in Sweden during the early twentieth century}},
  url          = {{http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s13280-024-01987-9}},
  doi          = {{10.1007/s13280-024-01987-9}},
  volume       = {{53}},
  year         = {{2024}},
}