Advanced

"Dysfunctional Disciplinary Boundaries, and the Need for a New Foundation Discipline?"

Arvidson, Mats LU (2012) Word and Music Association Forum In [Host publication title missing]
Abstract
As the heading suggests, my conference presentation aims to discuss how existing aesthetic disciplines, such as musicology and comparative literature studies, is unsuited to the understanding of a large number of cultural phenonoma. The complex flow of intermediality and the multimodality of every form of expression make the mutual borders between such disciplines dysfunctional. But since intermedial studies has sprung from comparative literature studies it rests to a large extent on ideas and concepts taken from that discipline. This poses not only a problem for the study of music as an intermedial phenomenon, but also a challenge for the future of the discipline. One reason for music still being a subordinate medium in relation to... (More)
As the heading suggests, my conference presentation aims to discuss how existing aesthetic disciplines, such as musicology and comparative literature studies, is unsuited to the understanding of a large number of cultural phenonoma. The complex flow of intermediality and the multimodality of every form of expression make the mutual borders between such disciplines dysfunctional. But since intermedial studies has sprung from comparative literature studies it rests to a large extent on ideas and concepts taken from that discipline. This poses not only a problem for the study of music as an intermedial phenomenon, but also a challenge for the future of the discipline. One reason for music still being a subordinate medium in relation to literature (words) has to do with the ongoing conflict about music being a non-representative medium. The idea of representation appears crucial to the intermedial discourses; the question of whether a medium can represent anything outside itself, or another medium, has partially informed the struggle between different theoretical positions – and this is the case with music and musicology. Some have argued that the difference between music and language can be identified as the source of the division within mu-sicology between formalist practice and forms of criticism dealing with represenation of music. This means that music still seems to suffer from the myth of being a non-representative medium. Paradoxically, when music entered the interdisciplinary field of intermedial studies, it still seems to be studied not for its own sake, but as something subordinate to literature.The specific question asked in the call for papers – how existing or changing academic structures have reconfigured the field’s ideological foundation in a subject area as obviously interdisciplinary as word and music studies – seems, at least to me as both a musicologist and in-termedialist, to be grounded on the problem for intermedial studies to not yet having developed a ”solid” intermedial theory instead of its current intermedial literature theory. Can one thus say that intermedial studies is suffering from a coherent intermedial theory? This question leads to another one: what is needed to create a new humanities discipline such as intermedial studies? I would argue that in order for intermedial studies to continue establishing itself as a ”new” scholarly field, the word ”inter” must be taken seriously, since this is what makes the difference between aesthetic disciplines such as musicology and comparative literature studies on the one hand, and intermedial studies on the other hand. (Less)
Please use this url to cite or link to this publication:
author
organization
publishing date
type
Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceeding
publication status
published
subject
keywords
Word and music studies, musicology, new musicology, comparative literature, intermediality, ideology, discipline, interdiscipline, multidiscipline, Steven Paul Scher, Werner Wolf, Lawrence Kramer, Walter Bernhart.
in
[Host publication title missing]
editor
Hinz, Hannah and
publisher
Word and Music Association Forum
conference name
Word and Music Association Forum
language
English
LU publication?
yes
id
76d22219-ed6f-4a63-9930-7d3d28760a35 (old id 3164913)
date added to LUP
2012-11-07 09:36:36
date last changed
2016-04-16 10:08:57
@inproceedings{76d22219-ed6f-4a63-9930-7d3d28760a35,
  abstract     = {As the heading suggests, my conference presentation aims to discuss how existing aesthetic disciplines, such as musicology and comparative literature studies, is unsuited to the understanding of a large number of cultural phenonoma. The complex flow of intermediality and the multimodality of every form of expression make the mutual borders between such disciplines dysfunctional. But since intermedial studies has sprung from comparative literature studies it rests to a large extent on ideas and concepts taken from that discipline. This poses not only a problem for the study of music as an intermedial phenomenon, but also a challenge for the future of the discipline. One reason for music still being a subordinate medium in relation to literature (words) has to do with the ongoing conflict about music being a non-representative medium. The idea of representation appears crucial to the intermedial discourses; the question of whether a medium can represent anything outside itself, or another medium, has partially informed the struggle between different theoretical positions – and this is the case with music and musicology. Some have argued that the difference between music and language can be identified as the source of the division within mu-sicology between formalist practice and forms of criticism dealing with represenation of music. This means that music still seems to suffer from the myth of being a non-representative medium. Paradoxically, when music entered the interdisciplinary field of intermedial studies, it still seems to be studied not for its own sake, but as something subordinate to literature.The specific question asked in the call for papers – how existing or changing academic structures have reconfigured the field’s ideological foundation in a subject area as obviously interdisciplinary as word and music studies – seems, at least to me as both a musicologist and in-termedialist, to be grounded on the problem for intermedial studies to not yet having developed a ”solid” intermedial theory instead of its current intermedial literature theory. Can one thus say that intermedial studies is suffering from a coherent intermedial theory? This question leads to another one: what is needed to create a new humanities discipline such as intermedial studies? I would argue that in order for intermedial studies to continue establishing itself as a ”new” scholarly field, the word ”inter” must be taken seriously, since this is what makes the difference between aesthetic disciplines such as musicology and comparative literature studies on the one hand, and intermedial studies on the other hand.},
  author       = {Arvidson, Mats},
  booktitle    = {[Host publication title missing]},
  editor       = {Hinz, Hannah},
  keyword      = {Word and music studies,musicology,new musicology,comparative literature,intermediality,ideology,discipline,interdiscipline,multidiscipline,Steven Paul Scher,Werner Wolf,Lawrence Kramer,Walter Bernhart.},
  language     = {eng},
  publisher    = {Word and Music Association Forum},
  title        = {"Dysfunctional Disciplinary Boundaries, and the Need for a New Foundation Discipline?"},
  year         = {2012},
}