Are current rapid detection tests for Group A Streptococci sensitive enough? Evaluation of 2 commercial kits
(2002) In Scandinavian Journal of Infectious Diseases 34(11). p.797-799- Abstract
- A new, 1-step, enzyme-linked immunoassay kit for detection of Group A Streptococci (GAS) in throat samples (QuickVue In-Line One-Step Strep A Test; Quidel Corporation, San Diego, CA) was evaluated for use in a study comprising 536 patients in 8 primary healthcare centres. Compared to conventional culture at the clinical microbiology laboratory, the sensitivity achieved was 73.9% and the specificity 86.8%; these figures were not affected to any major extent by broth enrichment of samples before culturing or following PCR testing of the cysteine proteinase gene for independent diagnosis of GAS. It was also found that most samples containing low numbers of GAS were missed by the rapid test. We therefore evaluated the kit in use in our area... (More)
- A new, 1-step, enzyme-linked immunoassay kit for detection of Group A Streptococci (GAS) in throat samples (QuickVue In-Line One-Step Strep A Test; Quidel Corporation, San Diego, CA) was evaluated for use in a study comprising 536 patients in 8 primary healthcare centres. Compared to conventional culture at the clinical microbiology laboratory, the sensitivity achieved was 73.9% and the specificity 86.8%; these figures were not affected to any major extent by broth enrichment of samples before culturing or following PCR testing of the cysteine proteinase gene for independent diagnosis of GAS. It was also found that most samples containing low numbers of GAS were missed by the rapid test. We therefore evaluated the kit in use in our area (TestPack Plus Strep A Test; Abbott Laboratories, Chicago, IL) in a separate study of 615 patients. Somewhat increased sensitivity (82.8%) and specificity (96.1%) were obtained. As current antigen tests depend on subjective judgement of test outcome, improvements in test design or provision of more detailed instructions may be desirable in order to achieve optimal results. (Less)
Please use this url to cite or link to this publication:
https://lup.lub.lu.se/record/320079
- author
- Nerbrand, Christina LU ; Jasir, Aftab LU and Schalén, Claës LU
- organization
- publishing date
- 2002
- type
- Contribution to journal
- publication status
- published
- subject
- in
- Scandinavian Journal of Infectious Diseases
- volume
- 34
- issue
- 11
- pages
- 797 - 799
- publisher
- Informa Healthcare
- external identifiers
-
- wos:000180198500001
- pmid:12578144
- scopus:0036968632
- ISSN
- 1651-1980
- DOI
- 10.1080/0036554021000026953
- language
- English
- LU publication?
- yes
- id
- 1e188f90-2a99-48ee-bcb4-a4b4094d87dc (old id 320079)
- date added to LUP
- 2016-04-01 16:54:03
- date last changed
- 2023-01-05 03:25:53
@article{1e188f90-2a99-48ee-bcb4-a4b4094d87dc, abstract = {{A new, 1-step, enzyme-linked immunoassay kit for detection of Group A Streptococci (GAS) in throat samples (QuickVue In-Line One-Step Strep A Test; Quidel Corporation, San Diego, CA) was evaluated for use in a study comprising 536 patients in 8 primary healthcare centres. Compared to conventional culture at the clinical microbiology laboratory, the sensitivity achieved was 73.9% and the specificity 86.8%; these figures were not affected to any major extent by broth enrichment of samples before culturing or following PCR testing of the cysteine proteinase gene for independent diagnosis of GAS. It was also found that most samples containing low numbers of GAS were missed by the rapid test. We therefore evaluated the kit in use in our area (TestPack Plus Strep A Test; Abbott Laboratories, Chicago, IL) in a separate study of 615 patients. Somewhat increased sensitivity (82.8%) and specificity (96.1%) were obtained. As current antigen tests depend on subjective judgement of test outcome, improvements in test design or provision of more detailed instructions may be desirable in order to achieve optimal results.}}, author = {{Nerbrand, Christina and Jasir, Aftab and Schalén, Claës}}, issn = {{1651-1980}}, language = {{eng}}, number = {{11}}, pages = {{797--799}}, publisher = {{Informa Healthcare}}, series = {{Scandinavian Journal of Infectious Diseases}}, title = {{Are current rapid detection tests for Group A Streptococci sensitive enough? Evaluation of 2 commercial kits}}, url = {{http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/0036554021000026953}}, doi = {{10.1080/0036554021000026953}}, volume = {{34}}, year = {{2002}}, }