International Centre for Settlement of Investment Disputes Tribunal, Spyridon Roussalis v Romania, Decision of 7 December 2011
(2013) In International and Comparative Law Quarterly 62(1). p.241-250- Abstract
- Abstract in Undetermined
International lawyers interested in international investment law and treaty interpretation issues should consider the international award recently delivered by an ICSID Tribunal in the case of Spyridon Roussalis v Romania.1 The case arose out of the privatization of a Romanian warehouse company (SC Malimp SA). On 23 October 1998, another Romanian company (Continent SRL) entered into a share purchase agreement with the Romanian authority for state assets recovery (AVAS) to purchase 372,523 shares in SC Malimp SA, or the equivalent of a 70 per cent interest in the company. Following the acquisition of SC Malimp SA, the name of that company was changed to SC Continent Marine Enterprise SA (or ‘Continent SA’ for... (More) - Abstract in Undetermined
International lawyers interested in international investment law and treaty interpretation issues should consider the international award recently delivered by an ICSID Tribunal in the case of Spyridon Roussalis v Romania.1 The case arose out of the privatization of a Romanian warehouse company (SC Malimp SA). On 23 October 1998, another Romanian company (Continent SRL) entered into a share purchase agreement with the Romanian authority for state assets recovery (AVAS) to purchase 372,523 shares in SC Malimp SA, or the equivalent of a 70 per cent interest in the company. Following the acquisition of SC Malimp SA, the name of that company was changed to SC Continent Marine Enterprise SA (or ‘Continent SA’ for short). (Less)
Please use this url to cite or link to this publication:
https://lup.lub.lu.se/record/2374581
- author
- Linderfalk, Ulf LU
- organization
- publishing date
- 2013
- type
- Contribution to journal
- publication status
- published
- subject
- in
- International and Comparative Law Quarterly
- volume
- 62
- issue
- 1
- pages
- 241 - 250
- publisher
- Cambridge University Press
- external identifiers
-
- wos:000314302100010
- scopus:84873303841
- ISSN
- 0020-5893
- DOI
- 10.1017/S0020589312000516
- language
- English
- LU publication?
- yes
- id
- 3381ed8c-15e6-4afc-8353-4110dd7f566e (old id 2374581)
- date added to LUP
- 2016-04-01 11:06:50
- date last changed
- 2022-10-12 13:08:36
@article{3381ed8c-15e6-4afc-8353-4110dd7f566e, abstract = {{Abstract in Undetermined<br/>International lawyers interested in international investment law and treaty interpretation issues should consider the international award recently delivered by an ICSID Tribunal in the case of Spyridon Roussalis v Romania.1 The case arose out of the privatization of a Romanian warehouse company (SC Malimp SA). On 23 October 1998, another Romanian company (Continent SRL) entered into a share purchase agreement with the Romanian authority for state assets recovery (AVAS) to purchase 372,523 shares in SC Malimp SA, or the equivalent of a 70 per cent interest in the company. Following the acquisition of SC Malimp SA, the name of that company was changed to SC Continent Marine Enterprise SA (or ‘Continent SA’ for short).}}, author = {{Linderfalk, Ulf}}, issn = {{0020-5893}}, language = {{eng}}, number = {{1}}, pages = {{241--250}}, publisher = {{Cambridge University Press}}, series = {{International and Comparative Law Quarterly}}, title = {{International Centre for Settlement of Investment Disputes Tribunal, Spyridon Roussalis v Romania, Decision of 7 December 2011}}, url = {{http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/S0020589312000516}}, doi = {{10.1017/S0020589312000516}}, volume = {{62}}, year = {{2013}}, }