Skip to main content

Lund University Publications

LUND UNIVERSITY LIBRARIES

International Centre for Settlement of Investment Disputes Tribunal, Spyridon Roussalis v Romania, Decision of 7 December 2011

Linderfalk, Ulf LU (2013) In International and Comparative Law Quarterly 62(1). p.241-250
Abstract
Abstract in Undetermined
International lawyers interested in international investment law and treaty interpretation issues should consider the international award recently delivered by an ICSID Tribunal in the case of Spyridon Roussalis v Romania.1 The case arose out of the privatization of a Romanian warehouse company (SC Malimp SA). On 23 October 1998, another Romanian company (Continent SRL) entered into a share purchase agreement with the Romanian authority for state assets recovery (AVAS) to purchase 372,523 shares in SC Malimp SA, or the equivalent of a 70 per cent interest in the company. Following the acquisition of SC Malimp SA, the name of that company was changed to SC Continent Marine Enterprise SA (or ‘Continent SA’ for... (More)
Abstract in Undetermined
International lawyers interested in international investment law and treaty interpretation issues should consider the international award recently delivered by an ICSID Tribunal in the case of Spyridon Roussalis v Romania.1 The case arose out of the privatization of a Romanian warehouse company (SC Malimp SA). On 23 October 1998, another Romanian company (Continent SRL) entered into a share purchase agreement with the Romanian authority for state assets recovery (AVAS) to purchase 372,523 shares in SC Malimp SA, or the equivalent of a 70 per cent interest in the company. Following the acquisition of SC Malimp SA, the name of that company was changed to SC Continent Marine Enterprise SA (or ‘Continent SA’ for short). (Less)
Please use this url to cite or link to this publication:
author
organization
publishing date
type
Contribution to journal
publication status
published
subject
in
International and Comparative Law Quarterly
volume
62
issue
1
pages
241 - 250
publisher
Cambridge University Press
external identifiers
  • wos:000314302100010
  • scopus:84873303841
ISSN
0020-5893
DOI
10.1017/S0020589312000516
language
English
LU publication?
yes
id
3381ed8c-15e6-4afc-8353-4110dd7f566e (old id 2374581)
date added to LUP
2016-04-01 11:06:50
date last changed
2022-10-12 13:08:36
@article{3381ed8c-15e6-4afc-8353-4110dd7f566e,
  abstract     = {{Abstract in Undetermined<br/>International lawyers interested in international investment law and treaty interpretation issues should consider the international award recently delivered by an ICSID Tribunal in the case of Spyridon Roussalis v Romania.1 The case arose out of the privatization of a Romanian warehouse company (SC Malimp SA). On 23 October 1998, another Romanian company (Continent SRL) entered into a share purchase agreement with the Romanian authority for state assets recovery (AVAS) to purchase 372,523 shares in SC Malimp SA, or the equivalent of a 70 per cent interest in the company. Following the acquisition of SC Malimp SA, the name of that company was changed to SC Continent Marine Enterprise SA (or ‘Continent SA’ for short).}},
  author       = {{Linderfalk, Ulf}},
  issn         = {{0020-5893}},
  language     = {{eng}},
  number       = {{1}},
  pages        = {{241--250}},
  publisher    = {{Cambridge University Press}},
  series       = {{International and Comparative Law Quarterly}},
  title        = {{International Centre for Settlement of Investment Disputes Tribunal, Spyridon Roussalis v Romania, Decision of 7 December 2011}},
  url          = {{http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/S0020589312000516}},
  doi          = {{10.1017/S0020589312000516}},
  volume       = {{62}},
  year         = {{2013}},
}